Injury to the Posterior Tibial Tendon After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of the Medial Malleolus

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 360-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyler L. DeMill ◽  
Bradly W. Bussewitz ◽  
Terrence M. Philbin
Author(s):  
Michelle Zeidan ◽  
Andrew R. Stephens ◽  
Chong Zhang ◽  
Angela P. Presson ◽  
Andrew R. Tyser ◽  
...  

Foot & Ankle ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion C. Harper

A cadaver study was conducted to evaluate the role of the posterior tibial margin or posterior malleolus, as well as medial and lateral supporting structures, in providing posterior stability for the talus. Posterior malleolar fractures consisting of approximately 30%, 40%, and 50% of the articular margin on the lateral radiograph were created in specimens that were then subjected to posterior stressing. No posterior talar subluxation was noted in any specimen. Repeat stressing following removal of the medial malleolus again revealed no subluxation in any specimen. The lateral supporting structures, primarily the posterior fibulotalar and fibulocalcaneal ligaments, appeared to be the key structures providing posterior talar stability. If the fibula is stable in an anatomic position, feared posterior instability of the talus would not appear to be an indication for internal fixation of posterior malleolar fractures.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhao ◽  
Yuhui Zhang ◽  
Dongni Johansson ◽  
Xingyu Chen ◽  
Fang Zheng ◽  
...  

Objective. The study aims to compare minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture in elder patients. Method. PubMed, Medline, EMbase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wangfang, and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals were searched to identify all relevant studies from inception to October 2016. Data were analyzed with Cochrane Collaboration’s Review Manage 5.2. Results. A total of 630 patients from 8 publications were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that MIPO was superior to ORIF in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture in elder patients. It was reflected in reducing blood loss, operation time, postoperative pain, or fracture healing time of the surgery and in improving recovery of muscle strength. Concerning complications, no significant difference was seen between MIPO and ORIF. Conclusion. The MIPO was more suitable than ORIF for treating proximal humeral fracture in elder patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document