scholarly journals Increased blood pressure variability after acute ischemic stroke increases the risk of death: A secondary analysis of the Virtual International Stroke Trial Archive

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 204800401985649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam de Havenon ◽  
Greg Stoddard ◽  
Monica Saini ◽  
Ka-Ho Wong ◽  
David Tirschwell ◽  
...  

Background Despite promising epidemiological data, it remains unclear if increased blood pressure variability is associated with death after acute ischemic stroke. Our objective was to examine this association in a large cohort of acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of anonymized, pooled, participant data from the Virtual International Stroke Trial Archive. We included patients with a 90-day modified Rankin Scale and blood pressure readings in the 24 h after study enrollment. The exposure was blood pressure variability during the day after study enrollment, calculated for the systolic and diastolic blood pressure using six statistical methodologies. The primary outcome was death within 90 days of stroke onset. Results Our cohort comprised 1891 patients of whom 277 (14.7%) died within 90 days. All indices of blood pressure variability were higher in patients who died, but the difference was more pronounced for systolic than diastolic blood pressure variability (systolic standard deviation for alive versus dead patients = 13.4 versus 15.9 mmHg, p < 0.001). Similar results were found in logistic regression models fit to the outcome of death, but only systolic blood pressure variability remained significant in adjusted models (Odds Ratio for death when comparing highest to lowest tercile of systolic blood pressure variability = 1.41–1.89, p < 0.03 for all). Conclusions and relevance: These results reinforce prior studies that found increased blood pressure variability is associated with worse neurologic outcome after stroke. These data should help guide research on blood pressure variability after stroke and advocate for the inclusion of death as a clinical outcome in future studies that therapeutically reduce blood pressure variability.

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Hosoki ◽  
Kaori Miwa ◽  
Takeshi Yoshimoto ◽  
Kanta Tanaka ◽  
Hajime Ikenouchi ◽  
...  

Introduction: There has been increasing evidence that higher systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV) is related to unfavorable outcomes in patients with stroke. We explored the relation between SBPV and clinical outcomes after reperfusion therapy; intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT). Methods: We retrieved data of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with reperfusion therapy from our prospective stroke registry between October 2005 and December 2018. We calculated the following five SBPV during 24 hours after IVT or EVT; mean, standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), successive variation (SV), and average real variability (ARV). Clinical outcomes included unfavorable outcomes as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 3-6 at 3 months and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) as any hemorrhage with neurological deterioration of 4 points of more on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Successful reperfusion was indicated with early neurological improvements of 4 points of more on the NIHSS after IVT alone or Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scores of 2b or 3 after EVT alone or EVT combined with IVT. Results: Among 933 patients with premorbid mRS scores of 0-1 (72±12 years; 316 women), 426 patients with unfavorable outcomes and 35 patients with sICH were observed. In adjusted analyses, all measures of SBPV but CV were related to unfavorable outcomes, while all measures of SBPV but mean SBP were related to sICH. In 566 patients with successful reperfusion, 228 patients with unfavorable outcomes and 10 patients with sICH were observed. In adjusted analyses, all measures of SBPV but mean SBP were positively related to unfavorable outcomes, while no measures of SBPV were independently related to sICH (table). Conclusion: High SBPV after successful reperfusion therapy contributed to unfavorable outcomes, suggesting high SBPV after reperfusion therapy might need more attention.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 473-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A Dickie ◽  
Benjamin Aribisala ◽  
Grant Mair ◽  
Eivind Berge ◽  
Richard I Lindley ◽  
...  

Higher blood pressure, blood pressure variability, and leukoaraiosis are risk factors for early adverse events and poor functional outcome after ischemic stroke, but prior studies differed on whether leukoaraiosis was associated with blood pressure variability, including in ischemic stroke. In the Third International Stroke Trial, blood pressure was measured in the acute phase of ischemic stroke immediately prior to randomization, and at 0.5, 1, and 24 h after randomization. Masked neuroradiologists rated index infarct, leukoaraiosis, and atrophy on CT using validated methods. We characterized blood pressure variation by coefficient of variance and three other standard methods. We measured associations between blood pressure, blood pressure variability, and leukoaraiosis using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for age, and a number of covariates related to treatment and stroke type/severity. Among 3017 patients, mean (±SD) systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased from 155(±24)/82(±15) mmHg pre-randomization to 146(±23)/78(±14) mmHg 24 h later ( P < 0.005). Mean within-subject coefficient of variance was 0.09 ± 0.05 for systolic and 0.11 ± 0.06 for diastolic blood pressure. Patients with most leukoaraiosis were older and had higher blood pressure than those with least ( P < 0.0001). Although statistically significant in simple pairwise comparisons, no measures of blood pressure variability were associated with leukoaraiosis when adjusting for confounding variables ( P > 0.05), e.g. age. Our results suggest that blood pressure variability is not a potential mechanism to explain the association between leukoaraiosis and poor outcome after acute stroke.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document