Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English–Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (sup3) ◽  
pp. S91-S104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Looi ◽  
Elizabeth-Raye Teo ◽  
Jenny Loo
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. e359-e368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansze Mok ◽  
Colleen M. Holt ◽  
Kathy Y. S. Lee ◽  
Richard C. Dowell ◽  
Adam P. Vogel

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. e421-e428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Gu ◽  
Bo Liu ◽  
Ziye Liu ◽  
Beier Qi ◽  
Shuo Wang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duoduo Tao ◽  
Rui Deng ◽  
Ye Jiang ◽  
John J. Galvin ◽  
Qian-Jie Fu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Hongwei Ding ◽  
Yang Zhang

Pitch perception is known to be difficult for individuals with cochlear implant (CI), and adding a hearing aid (HA) in the non-implanted ear is potentially beneficial. The current study aimed to investigate the bimodal benefit for lexical tone recognition in Mandarin-speaking preschoolers using a CI and an HA in opposite ears. The child participants were required to complete tone identification in quiet and in noise with CI + HA in comparison with CI alone. While the bimodal listeners showed confusion between Tone 2 and Tone 3 in recognition, the additional acoustic information from the contralateral HA alleviated confusion between these two tones in quiet. Moreover, significant improvement was demonstrated in the CI + HA condition over the CI alone condition in noise. The bimodal benefit for individual subjects could be predicted by the low-frequency hearing threshold of the non-implanted ear and the duration of bimodal use. The findings support the clinical practice to fit a contralateral HA in the non-implanted ear for the potential benefit in Mandarin tone recognition in CI children. The limitations call for further studies on auditory plasticity on an individual basis to gain insights on the contributing factors to the bimodal benefit or its absence.


2012 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 1353-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Wang ◽  
Bo Liu ◽  
Ruijuan Dong ◽  
Yun Zhou ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 487-498
Author(s):  
Puisan Wong ◽  
Man Wai Cheng

Purpose Theoretical models and substantial research have proposed that general auditory sensitivity is a developmental foundation for speech perception and language acquisition. Nonetheless, controversies exist about the effectiveness of general auditory training in improving speech and language skills. This research investigated the relationships among general auditory sensitivity, phonemic speech perception, and word-level speech perception via the examination of pitch and lexical tone perception in children. Method Forty-eight typically developing 4- to 6-year-old Cantonese-speaking children were tested on the discrimination of the pitch patterns of lexical tones in synthetic stimuli, discrimination of naturally produced lexical tones, and identification of lexical tone in familiar words. Results The findings revealed that accurate lexical tone discrimination and identification did not necessarily entail the accurate discrimination of nonlinguistic stimuli that followed the pitch levels and pitch shapes of lexical tones. Although pitch discrimination and tone discrimination abilities were strongly correlated, accuracy in pitch discrimination was lower than that in tone discrimination, and nonspeech pitch discrimination ability did not precede linguistic tone discrimination in the developmental trajectory. Conclusions Contradicting the theoretical models, the findings of this study suggest that general auditory sensitivity and speech perception may not be causally or hierarchically related. The finding that accuracy in pitch discrimination is lower than that in tone discrimination suggests that comparable nonlinguistic auditory perceptual ability may not be necessary for accurate speech perception and language learning. The results cast doubt on the use of nonlinguistic auditory perceptual training to improve children's speech, language, and literacy abilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document