Reduced Severe aGVHD and Improved Survival Using Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide/Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis in AML Patients Receiving Myeloablative Fractionated Busulfan Conditioning Regimen

Background: Myeloablative conditioning can be given safely to older patients by simply administering busulfan over a longer period (fractionated busulfan regimen) than the standard four day regimen. (Popat et al Lancet Haematology 2018). Subsequently, we added post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) GVHD prophylaxis to our fractionated regimen with a hypothesis that it will reduce GVHD and improve outcomes. Herein, we report the results of our retrospective analysis comparing outcomes of patients with AML who received fractionated busulfan myeloablative conditioning and PTCy versus standard tacrolimus (Tac) and methotrexate (Mtx) GVHD prophylaxis. Methods: Patients with AML between 18-70 years of age with adequate organ function and 8/8-HLA matched related or unrelated donor, who were treated on 4 consecutive protocols using fractionated busulfan were included in the analysis. All patients received two fixed doses of busulfan 80mg/m2 as outpatient either on days -13 and -12, or on days -20 and-13 followed by busulfan on day -6 to -3 dosed to achieve target area under the curve (AUC) of 20,000 mol/min for the whole course based on pharmacokinetic studies. Fludarabine ± cladribine were given on day -6 to -3. GVHD prophylaxis was PTCy 50mg/kg on days 3 and 4 and Tac ± mycophenolate mofetil in PTCy cohort (n=53), or standard Tac+ Mtx (n=53). Patients in both the cohorts were matched 1:1 by propensity score. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the PTCy and Tac/Mtx cohorts. The median age was 60 (range, 18-70) and 58 (range, 24-70) years, respectively, (P=0.3). Forty-nine percent were in CR, and 30% had comorbidity index >3 in each arm. Similar proportion of patients had ELN adverse risk in both arms (43% vs 40%, respectively P=0.7). The median follow up was 19 months (range, 3-36) in the PTCy and 46 months (range, 14-73) in Tac/Mtx cohort. Overall survival at 2-year was 78% vs 58% (P=0.03), non-relapse mortality was 6% vs 13% (P=0.2), incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD at 1-year was 6% vs 19% (P=0.07) and chronic GVHD at 2-year was 10% vs 29% (P=0.03) [Table 1 and figure 1]. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was prolonged by 3 days (15 vs 12 days; P<0.001) and platelet engraftment by 9 days (22 vs 13 days; P<0.001) in the PTCy cohort. Full donor chimerism at day 30 was noted in 79% vs 28% in the PTCy and Tac/Mtx cohorts respectively, (P<0.001). Conclusion: As compared to Tac/Mtx, PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis not only reduced severe acute GVHD and chronic GVHD, but also improved overall survival in AML patients up to the age of 70 years who received myeloablative fractionated busulfan conditioning. Prospective randomized trial is warranted to validate these findings. Disclosures Popat: Bayer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Bashir:Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Ciurea:Kiadis Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: stock holder; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Research Funding. Kebriaei:Kite: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Nieto:Astra-Zeneca: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Affimed: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Oran:Astex pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AROG pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Genzyme: Other: Speaker; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Autolus: Consultancy; Bioclinical: Consultancy. Molldrem:M. D. Anderson & Astellas Pharma: Other: Royalties. Champlin:Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Low Incidence of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Using Matched Related or Unrelated Donors: Phase II Study Interim Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147569 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1811-1811

Author(s):

Najla H El Jurdi ◽

Daniel O'Leary ◽

Fiona He ◽

Todd E. DeFor ◽

Armin Rashidi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Preparative Regimen

Abstract Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative treatment for many high-risk hematologic malignancies. Myeloablative conditioning is currently the standard of care for young and fit patients; however, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continues to be a major limitation to the success of HCT, increasing post-transplant morbidity and mortality. An ideal HCT is one combining strategies that reduce incidence and severity of GVHD, without compromising graft-versus-tumor effect. We hypothesized that GVHD prophylaxis regimen consisting of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus (Tac) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) will reduce the incidence of chronic GVHD in patients receiving a standard hematopoietic myeloablative HCT without an increase in risk of malignant relapse. Methods This is an interim analysis of a phase II study using a myeloablative preparative regimen of either: 1. total body irradiation (TBI, total dose 1320 cGy administered twice a day from days -4 to -1) or 2. Busulfan 3.2mg/kg daily (cumulative AUC 19,000 - 21,000 µmol/min/L) plus fludarabine 160mg/m 2 days -5 to -2 for patients unable to receive further radiation, followed by a GVHD prophylaxis regimen of PTCy (50mg/kg days +3 and +4), Tac and MMF (beginning day +5). The primary endpoint is cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive treatment at 1 year post-transplant. Patient and disease characteristics are detailed in Table 1. Eligibility included: age ≤ 60 years, malignant or non-malignant diagnosis, matched related (MRD) or unrelated (MUD) donor with either a bone marrow (BM) or filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood (PB) graft. Results Through October 2020 we treated 63 patients with a median follow up of 502 days post-transplant. Of those, 48% were female and n=11 (17%) younger than 18 with median age at HCT of 36 years (range, 2-55; Interquartile range [IQR], 20-48). Donor source was 8/8 MRD in 44 patients (70%), 8/8 MUD in 18 (29%), and one with 7/8 MUD. Graft source was BM in n=28 (44%) and PB in n=35 (56%). Preparative regimen was TBI in 94% of patients. All patients achieved primary neutrophil engraftment by 42 days, median 16 days (range, 13-27). Overall, 94% achieved platelet engraftment by 6 months, median 25 days (range, 16-98). At day 100, 48 patients (86%) achieved full donor bone marrow chimerism (>95% donor DNA); 29 (52%) and 52 (95%) achieved full donor peripheral blood CD3 and CD33 chimerism (defined as >95% donor). 42 patients (66%) required total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for oral mucositis and regimen-related toxicities during their initial transplant admission. Cumulative incidence of Grade II-IV acute GVHD by 100 days post-transplant was 14% overall (95% confidence interval CI: 6-23%), 7% for MRD and 32% for the MUD group; Grade III-IV acute GVHD was 5% overall (CI: 0-10%), similar for both MRD and MUD group. At 1 year, only two patients receiving a PBSC graft developed chronic GVHD requiring immune suppression, for a cumulative incidence of 3% overall, one in the MRD group and one in the MUD group. Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse was estimated at 21% overall, 22% and 16% for the MRD and MUD groups, respectively. Two year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 13% overall, 15% and 5% for MRD and MUD, respectively. Estimated 2-year overall survival was 79% overall (CI: 65-88%), 75% for the MRD group and 95% for MUD. Estimated 2-year GVHD-free relapse free survival (GRFS) was 57% overall (CI: 42-69%), 56% and 63% in the MRD and MUD groups, respectively. Discussion Myeloablative transplantation with a TBI preparative regimen, followed by a GVHD prophylaxis regimen of PTCy, Tac, and MMF results in very low incidence of chronic GVHD. Importantly, this regimen is feasible and effective for pediatric and adult patients. Further improvement in outcomes can be achieved by incorporating post-transplant relapse mitigating strategies as well as supportive care measures to decrease regimen-related toxicities. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Arora: Kadmom: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding. Janakiram: Bristol Meyer Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, ADCT Therapeutics: Honoraria; FATE, Nektar Therapeutics: Research Funding. Smith: Astellas Gene Therapies: Current Employment. Bachanova: Incyte: Research Funding; KaryoPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; FATE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Brunstein: BlueRock: Research Funding; AlloVir: Consultancy; FATE: Research Funding; NANT: Research Funding; GamidaCell: Research Funding. MacMillan: Equilium: Other: DSMB member; Incyte: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Miller: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ONK Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vycellix: Consultancy; GT Biopharma: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Wugen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Betts: Patent Disclosures: Patents & Royalties: B.C.B. holds a patent (WO2015120436A2) related to CD4+ T cell pSTAT3 as a marker and therapeutic target of acute GVHD. B.C.B. additionally holds a provisional patent (WO2017058950A1) related to the use of JAK inhibitors for rejection and GVHD prevention. . Vercellotti: Mitobridge, an Astellas Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding. Weisdorf: Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Holtan: Generon: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Myeloablative Fractionated Busulfan Conditioning Regimen in Older Patients: Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122124 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 256-256 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Uday Popat ◽

Rohtesh S. Mehta ◽

Roland Bassett ◽

Amanda L. Olson ◽

Julianne Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Very High

Background: Traditionally, pre-transplant conditioning regimen is given over 4-6 days before hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Delivering higher dose chemotherapy preparative regimen over a longer time period has not been tested previously. We hypothesized that the delivery of myeloablative dose of busulfan over a 3-week period may reduce toxicity and non-relapse mortality (NRM), without affecting relapse, and tested this in a prospective phase II study. Methods: Patients between 18 and 70 years of age with hematological malignancies and adequate organ function, with 8/8-HLA matched related or unrelated donor were eligible. They received a fixed dose of busulfan 80mg/m2 as outpatient on days -20 and -13. Then, fludarabine 40mg/m2 was given on days -6 to -2 followed by busulfan dosed to achieve target area under the curve (AUC) of 20,000 mol/min for the whole course based on pharmacokinetic studies. GVHD prophylaxis was cyclophosphamide (PTCy) 50mg/kg on days 3 and 4 and tacrolimus. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was added to later unrelated donor recipients. All patients received standard supportive care. The primary endpoint was day 100 NRM. Results: We enrolled 52 patients with a median age of 62 (range, 39-69) years. Almost half (n=25, 48%) had AML or MDS and the other half (n=26, 50%) had had CML or MPD; 1 (2%) had multiple myeloma. Low, intermediate, high and very-high disease risk index (DRI) was present in 3 (6%), 34 (65%), 14 (27%) and 1 (2%). HCT-comorbidity index was >3 in 23 (44%) and 1-2 (n=23, 44%). A majority (n=32, 62%) had an unrelated donor. With a median follow up of 14 months (range, 3-23), NRM at day 100 was 1.9% (n=1) and 8% (95% CI, 0-15) at 1 year. Overall survival, progression-free survival and relapse at 1-year were 83% (95% CI, 73-95%), 78% (95% CI, 67-91%), and 14% (95% CI, 4-24%), respectively [Table]. There were no graft failures. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 17 days (range, 13-33) and that of platelets (> 20K/µL, n=45) was 24 days (range, 9-266). Day 100 grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD rates were 37% (95% CI, 23-50%) and 6% (95% CI, 0-12%), respectively; 1-year chronic GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD rates were 9% (95% CI, 0-17%) and 7% (95% CI, 0-14%), respectively. Overall survival at 1-year differed significantly among patients with low/intermediate DRI (94%; 87-100%) and those with high/very high DRI (53%; 31-91%), P=0.001. Conclusion: Myeloablative fractionated busulfan regimen with PTCy GVHD prophylaxis is feasible in older patients, has low incidence of severe acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and NRM and results in promising overall survival. Table Disclosures Popat: Bayer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Bashir:Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; StemLine: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Ciurea:Miltenyi: Research Funding; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: stock holder. Kebriaei:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy; Kite: Honoraria. Nieto:Astra-Zeneca: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Oran:AROG pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astex pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Autolous: Consultancy; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Speaker: Other: Speaker; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board. Molldrem:M. D. Anderson & Astellas Pharma: Other: Royalties. OffLabel Disclosure: Fludarabine & Busulfan as conditioning agent prior to transplant

Download Full-text

No Influence of Peripheral Blood CD34+ and CD3+ Graft Cell Counts on Outcomes after Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112453 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4577-4577

Author(s):

Alice Garnier ◽

Thierry Guillaume ◽

Pierre Peterlin ◽

Amandine Le Bourgeois ◽

Alix Duquesne ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cell Content ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Introduction Although associated with a higher incidence of acute GVHD, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are increasingly used for haploidentical allogeneic transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). Data reporting whether or not the composition of the PBSC graft impacts outcomes of patients receiving PTCY are still scarce. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included all adults allografted in our department who received a PBSC allotransplant after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) with PTCY. Grafts originated from a matched or haploidentical donor and recipients received a Baltimore-based or a Clo-Baltimore (where fludarabine is replaced by clofarabine)-based RIC regimen. All patients received cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetyl and PTCY as GVHD prophylaxis. CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell contents were considered to study their potential impact on the following outcomes: OS, DFS, GRFS, acute grade 2-4 and 3-4 GHVD and chronic GVHD, early immune reconstitution (IR, lymphocytes and monocytes counts at days+30 and +100 post-transplant, CD4+, CD8+, NK and B cells at day+100 post-transplant). Results Between November 2013 and May 2017, 77 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 48 males and 29 females with a median age of 58 years (range: 22-71) and a median follow-up for alive patients of 29.2 months (range: 8.4-53.2). Initial diagnoses were mainly acute myeloid (n=21) or lymphoid (n=6) leukemia, lymphoma (n=13), myelodysplastic syndrome (SMD, n=12), myelofibrosis (n=9). Thirty-eight patients were in complete remission at time of transplant (CR1 n=23; CR2 n=12, CR3 n=3) while 22 had active disease and 17 were in partial remission. Donors were sibling in 6 cases, matched unrelated (MUD) in 14, 9/10 mismatched unrelated in 1 and haploidentical in 56. Forty patients received a Baltimore RIC regimen and 37 a Clo-Baltimore RIC regimen. Analyses were performed in July 2018. Median infused CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell counts, based on recipients' weight, were 7.8 106/Kg (range: 1.45-14.24) and 22.23 107/kg (range: 1.95-66.75), respectively. All patients but three engrafted, the latter being 1 patient transplanted with a haplodonor, 1 with a MUD and 1 who died of infection during induction. Two-year OS, DFS and GRFS were 62.6% (52-74), 51.5% (40-63) and 36.6% (27-49), respectively. The incidences of grade 2-4 and 3-4 acute GVHD were 46.7% and 14.2%, respectively, while the incidence of moderate + severe chronic GVHD was 14%. Relapse occurred in 26 patients and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 15.5%. Baltimore vs Clo-Baltimore patients shared similar median infused CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell counts and outcomes. The same was observed for patients allografted with a haplodonor or not, except for the incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD which was significantly higher for the haplo group at 57.1% vs 19% (p=0.006). This difference was first attributed to the higher CD3+ cell content infused in this group (median: 24.05 vs 18.85 107/kg, p=0.04). However, using the median of CD3+ cell graft content as threshold, the incidence of acute grade 2-4 GVHD was not different between low vs high groups when considering haplo patients. This suggests that it was rather the type of donor that did influence acute GVHD occurrence and that PTCY is of particular interest for GVHD prophylaxis when using matched donors. Partitioning the patients according to the median level of CD34+ cells, there was no difference in terms of 2-year OS (57.1% vs 60.7%, p=0.53), DFS (44.5% vs 55.6%, p=0.47) , GRFS (31.7% vs 44.3%, p=0.32), acute grade 2-4 (59% vs 39%, p=0.13) and 3-4 GVHD (17% vs 6.4%, p=0.29), and moderate + severe chronic GVHD (19.5% vs 20%, p=0.57). Similarly, partitioning patients according to median graft CD3+ cell content, outcomes were similar for 2-year OS (64.8% vs 55.8%,p=0.45), DFS (46.3% vs 55.8%, p=0.62), GRFS (36.3% vs 40.4%, p=0.63), acute grade 2-4 (44.7% vs 56.4%, p=0.42) and 3-4 GVHD (10.5% vs 15.3%, p=0.76), and moderate + severe chronic GVHD (14% vs 17.6%, p=0.91). Finally, early IR was not influenced by CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell contents. Conclusion: PBSC CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell contents have no impact on survivals, GVHD incidence nor early IR after a RIC allotransplant using PTCY as GVHD prophylaxis. As a consequence, there is no need to manipulate the graft nor cap the stem cells dose to be infused. These data have to be confirmed prospectively on a larger cohort of patients. Disclosures Gastinne: Millennium/Takeda: Honoraria. Moreau:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Higher Grade Cytokine Release Syndrome Is a Predictive Factor for Gvhd in Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation with Peripheral Blood Cell

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-151187 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2881-2881

Author(s):

Benjamin Bouchacourt ◽

Valerio Maisano ◽

Ana Benzaquen ◽

Angela Granata ◽

Sabine Furst ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Cytokine Release ◽

Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii

Abstract Background: Early Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) is a common complication following haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) induced by the proliferation of alloreactive T-Cells. CRS is occurring more frequently in patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) comparatively to bone marrow transplant, however its impact on outcome, notably graft versus host disease (GVHD) remain unclear. The main objective was to evaluate the impact of severity of CRS on the risk of GVHD. Patients and Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients who had received a first haplo-HSCT for hematological malignancies, with PBSC as graft source. All patients received either a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) based on thiotepa (5mg/kg), busulfan (260 mg/m²) and fludarabine (120 mg/m²) [TBF], or a non-myeloablative conditioning (NMAC) based on fludarabine (150 mg/m²), cyclophosphamide (29 mg/kg) and 2 Gy TBI [CyFluTBI]. GVHD prophylaxis was based on PT-Cy 50 mg/kg (day+3 and +4) and cyclosporine A plus mycophenolate mofetil starting at day+5. All patients were given GSCF from day+5 to neutrophil recovery. Results: 241 consecutive patients were analyzed. One hundred patients (54%) had myeloid malignancies, and 111 (46%) had lymphoid malignancies. Most patients had intermediate or low risk DRI (n = 180, 75%) and HCT-CI was ≥ 3 for 159 patients (66%). Using ASTCT consensus criteria, 226 patients (94%) developed CRS, including 183 grade 1 and 43 grade ≥ 2. Transplantation and patient characteristics were not significantly different between patients with CRS grade 0-1 vs. ≥ 2, except for age. Indeed, patients with CRS grade ≥ 2 were significantly older than patients with CRS grade 0-1 (median 65 vs 60 yo respectively, p = 0.01). Patients with grade ≥ 2CRS had significantly higher cumulative incidence of day-100 grade II-IV acute GVHD (grade 0-1 vs. ≥ 2 : 28% and 44%, p = 0.028) and 4-year moderate to severe chronic GVHD (grade 0-1 vs. ≥ 2 : 16% and 30%, p = 0.024) compared to patients with grade 0-1 CRS (Figure 1). No difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse was observed between CRS groups (grade 0-1 vs. ≥ 2 : 22% and 21%, p = 0.802). By multivariate analysis, CRS grade ≥ 2 was the only factor associated with grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR = 1.99; 95%CI = [1.17-3.39], p = 0.011). CRS grade ≥ 2 was significantly associated with a higher risk of moderate to severe chronic GVHD (HR = 2.67; 95%CI = [1.36-5.21], p = 0.004) and poorer GVHD- and relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR = 1.78 ; 95%CI = [1.19-2.67], p = 0.005). Progression free survival, overall survival and non-relapse mortality were not influenced by the severity of CRS. Conclusion: In the context of PBSC haplo-HSCT, the occurrence of grade ≥ 2 CRS following graft infusion is significantly associated with an increased risk of both acute and chronic GVHD. This may improve the early identification of patients with high risk of GVHD for whom specific enhanced GVHD prophylaxis should be investigated. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chabannon: Sanofi SA: Other: Travel Support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Terumo BCT: Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi Biotech: Research Funding; Fresenius Kabi: Research Funding; EBMT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Alternative Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease in Europe

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111129 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4645-4645 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Barbara Cappelli ◽

Graziana Maria Scigliuolo ◽

Fernanda Volt ◽

Selim Corbacioglu ◽

Josu de la Fuente ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Graft Failure ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Alternative Donor

Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from an HLA identical sibling is a well-established curative therapy for sickle cell disease (SCD). HSCT from an unrelated donor is a treatment option, but the likelihood of finding a donor varies according to ethnicity and results are still limited. HLA haploidentical relatives can be alternatively used but, to date, only small series of patients have been described. We report outcomes of patients (pts) transplanted with related haploidentical (Haplo) or unrelated (UD) donors grafts and reported to EBMT/EUROCORD databases. Sixty four pts transplanted in 22 EBMT centers between 1991 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Pts were described according to the donor type: haploidentical (n=40) and unrelated (n=24) [adult UD n=19; cord blood (CB) n=5]. The objective of the study was to describe alternative donor transplants for SCD in Europe without performing comparison analyses due to the size and heterogeneity of the groups. Primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS). Median follow-up (FU) was 28 months (range: 1.6-156) [29.5 months (range: 2.1 - 133.5) for Haplo and 24.6 (range: 1.6 - 156) for UD]. Median age at HSCT was 14.2 years (range: 3-31.7) in Haplo and 11.8 (range: 2.1-42.8) in UD, with a predominance of children (<16 years) in both groups (23/40 and 19/24, respectively). Before HSCT, 68% of overall pts were treated with hydroxyurea and 62% received more than 20 red blood cell (RBC) units. RBC alloimmunization occurred in 14% of transfused pts. In both groups, vaso-occlusive crisis and cerebral vasculopathy were the most frequent SCD complications and the main indications for HSCT. Other complications were acute chest syndrome (44%), liver disease (31%) and infection (23%). In Haplo, median year of transplant was 2014 (range: 1991-2017) and in UD 2011 (range: 2004-2015). In Haplo, two major protocols were used: (1) post -transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) with G-CSF primed bone marrow (BM) and a fludarabine+ cyclophosphamide+thiotepa+2Gy TBI conditioning regimen [16 pts and 2 centers performing most (n=13) of the transplants]; (2) a protocol (performed in 2 centers) consisting in the use of G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with ex-vivo B and T cell depletion (BT depleted) (15 pts) and a fludarabine+thiotepa+ treosulfan conditioning regimen (14/15 pts). Haplo donors were most frequently the parents [mother (50%), father (29%), brother (14%) and cousin (7%)]. ATG was used in 95% of transplants and the most frequent combination for graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis was mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)+sirolimus in PTCY and MMF+ cyclosporine A (CSA) in BT depleted. In UD, graft source distribution was 14 BM, 5 PBSC and 5 CB. Conditioning regimens were mainly myeloablative (83%) with fludarabine+thiotepa+ treosulfan in 54% of HSCT. ATG was used in 87% and campath in 9% of transplants; GvHD prophylaxis was CSA and methotrexate in 50%. Neutrophil engraftment at 60 days was 95±4% in Haplo and 84±8% in adult UD, after a median engraftment time of 18 and 22 days, respectively. In Haplo, 7 pts experienced graft failure (3 primary and 4 late), of those 3 had a second allogeneic transplant and were alive at last FU, at 16, 16 and 63 months respectively; 1 patient died after rescue with autologous transplant and 3 were alive after autologous reconstitution. In adult UD, 3 pts had a primary and 1 a late graft failure, none of them had a second transplant and were all alive at last FU, at 2, 13, 28, 118 months respectively. Grade II-IV acute GvHD at 100 days was 25±7% in Haplo and 21±9% in adult UD; acute GvHD grade III-IV was observed in 3 pts in Haplo (none in BT depleted) and 2 pts in adult UD. Chronic GvHD was observed in 10 pts in Haplo (5 extensive, 3 of these in PTCY) and 3 pts in adult UD (2 extensive). OS at 3 years was 88±4%; being 89±5% in Haplo (88±8% for PTCY, 92±8% for BT depleted) and 94±5% in adult UD. 3-year event free survival was 58±7%; in detail, 60±9% in Haplo (56±12% for PTCY, 68±13% for BT depleted) and 60±12% in adult UD. Overall, 8 pts died (5 Haplo and 3 UD) due to infections or GVHD. Among the 5 pts receiving CB transplant 3 are alive (1 of which after graft failure and a second allogeneic transplant). Conclusion: This preliminary analysis shows that, despite an acceptable OS, rejection and chronic GvHD are still of concern; therefore alternative donor transplants for SCD should be performed in experienced centers with prospective clinical trials. Disclosures Pondarré: Blue Bird Bio: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zecca:Chimerix: Honoraria. Locatelli:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy. Bader:Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Riemser: Research Funding; Neovii: Research Funding; Cellgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bernaudin:AddMedica: Honoraria; Pierre fabre: Research Funding; BlueBirdBio: Consultancy; Cordons de Vie: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Secondary Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis with Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib Is Associated with Low Incidence of Recurrent, Late Acute and Chronic GVHD and Facilitated Calcineurin Inhibitor Taper within the First Year Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139666 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 41-42

Author(s):

Natasia Rodriguez ◽

Jasme Lee ◽

Lisa Flynn ◽

Fiona Murray ◽

Sean Devlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Calcineurin Inhibitor ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Overlap Syndrome ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Low Incidence

Background. GVHD is a frequent complication within the 1st year after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Recipients of reduced intensity (RI) and non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning combined with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based GVHD prophylaxis, frequently develop GVHD in the context of immunosuppression taper. Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) that has demonstrated immunomodulatory properties, inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines, anti-tumor activity, and has a wide safety profile. We hypothesized that secondary GVHD prophylaxis using ixazomib, will facilitate CNI taper without increase in GVHD frequency and severity, maintaining graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect, and a safety profile. Methods. We conducted an open label, prospective, single-center pilot study between 11/16 and 03/19. Eligible patients were > 18 yrs old, had a hematologic malignancy treated with RI or NMA conditioning allo-HCT, received CNI-based GVHD prophylaxis, and were within day 100 to 150 post-HCT. Patients with active acute and/or chronic GVHD were excluded. Patients were treated with ixazomib 4 mg orally once weekly, each cycle consisting of 3 weeks on and 1 week off therapy, until completion of taper from prophylactic CNI or 1-year post-HCT was reached, whichever occurred first. Patients who developed grade II-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, or died of transplant-related mortality (TRM) were deemed treatment failure. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of ixazomib for the prevention of recurrent or late grade II-IV acute GVHD or chronic GVHD at 1-year post-HCT. Additional endpoints included TRM, relapse rate, survival analysis, safety evaluation, and immune reconstitution. Results. A total of 18 patients (median age of 58 yrs) were accrued in the study. The majority were male, had a diagnosis of NHL, and received RI conditioning (Table 1). All patients had a PBSC graft, and 16 (89%) were 10/10 HLA-matched. The median time for initiation of ixazomib was 141.5 days post-HCT. Fourteen patients had no GVHD during the study period. The 4 patients who developed GVHD had severe overlap syndrome (n = 2), mild de novo chronic GVHD (n = 1), and recurrent grade II acute GVHD (n = 1). Notably, patients with severe overlap syndrome had limited chronic GVHD involvement affecting the mouth and/or eyes, and the severity score was driven by acute manifestations affecting the skin and GI tract. Six patients successfully discontinued CNI and 4 patients were tapering immunosuppression close to the end of study at 1-year post-HCT. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute and chronic GVHD at 1-year post-HCT was 25% (95%CI: 7.2-48.1) (Fig. 1A). No patients died during the study and therefore, the CI of TRM at 1-year was 0%, and only 1 patient had malignant relapse (NHL). The CI of PFS and the composite endpoint GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 1-year were 83% (95%CI: 58-100) and 73% (95%CI: 49-100, Fig 1B), respectively. All patients experienced at least 1 TEAE of any grade. Most AEs were grade 1 or 2, with the most common being cytopenia and elevation in ALT/AST. Drug-related SAEs were reported in 9 patients and included neutrophil and decreased WBC. Seven patients required ixazomib dose reduction due to side effects, and 5 patients were removed from the study due to toxicity (1 neutropenia, 3 GI, 1 skin rash). Of those, 1 had subsequent GVHD by day 365 post-HCT. Immune recovery at 3, 6 and 12 months post-HCT was evaluated. There was a rapid and sustained recovery in T-cell subpopulations and B cell reconstitution Fig 2. Conclusions. Secondary GVHD prophylaxis with ixazomib was associated with low incidence of recurrent and late acute and chronic GVHD within the 1st year post-HCT. This approach allowed CNI taper while preserving GVT effect without aggravating GVHD. No deaths occurred during the study period and the 1-year GRFS was high. Ixazomib was overall well tolerated and favored immune reconstitution post-HCT. Our findings support further development of this approach and provide a proof-of-concept for secondary GVHD prophylaxis. Disclosures Dahi: Kite: Consultancy. Giralt:TAKEDA: Research Funding; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; MILTENYI: Consultancy, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; OMEROS: Consultancy, Honoraria; ACTINUUM: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sauter:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite - a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharamaceuticals: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Perales:Omeros: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; NexImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Cidara Therapeutics: Other; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Bellicum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ponce:Ceramedix: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kadmon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

High Rate of Long Term Complete Remission for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Who Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Receive Salvage with Donor Lymphocyte Infusions (DLI)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.5860.5860 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 5860-5860

Author(s):

Alan P Skarbnik ◽

Mary E DiLorenzo ◽

Tracy Andrews ◽

Phyllis McKiernan ◽

Scott D. Rowley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Disease Status ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only curative option for CLL, in part due to allogeneic graft-vs-leukemia effect (GVL), which can lead to complete suppression of the CLL clone (Schetelig et al, JCO 2003). Management of post-SCT relapse remains challenging, and DLI has been successfully used as salvage, due to its potential to induce GVL (Delgado et al, Blood 2009). We evaluated outcomes of SCT for patients (pts) with a diagnosis of CLL transplanted at our center. Methods: 36 consecutive pts transplanted between 2004 and 2015 were reviewed. Kaplan Meier survival curves were produced to examine overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP) and post-DLI survival. Univariate Cox Proportionate hazard models were also estimated to assess the impact of pt characteristics on the risk of survival and progression. Bivariate frequencies with Fisher exact tests, correlation analysis, and independent samples t-tests were performed to test associations across outcomes. Results: Sample was 72% male. Median age at time of SCT was 57 yo (range 42-74). Pts had a median time of 70 months (mos) between diagnosis (Dx) of CLL and SCT. Median follow-up post-SCT was 32 mos (range 1-118). Of the 30 pts with known disease status at the time of SCT, 16.7% were in complete remission (CR), 20% had stable disease (SD), 50% were in partial remission (PR) and 13.3% had progressive disease (PD). Median number of lines of therapy pre-SCT was 3 (range 1-8). Thirteen pts (36%) were refractory to their first line of therapy. 10 pts (27.8%) had del(17p), 11 pts (30.6%) had del(11q) and 8 pts (22.2%) had complex cytogenetics. Most patients (72%) received pre-SCT conditioning with FCR (Khouri et al, Exp Hematol 2004). 16 pts (44.4%) received rATG as part of their conditioning regimen. Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of methotrexate and tacrolimus. 20 (55.6%) pts had acute GVHD and 19 (52.8%) had chronic GVHD. 5 (13.8%) pts had grade 3/4 acute GVHD and 1 (2.7%) had extensive chronic GVHD. When comparing pts who received SCT from unrelated donors (MUD, 24 pts) vs sibling donors (sib, 10 pts) there were no differences in rates of GVHD, disease progression or overall survival. Twenty-seven pts (75%) were in CR at first disease evaluation after SCT (CR conversion rate of 58.3%) and 2 pts (5.5%) had PD. On follow-up, another 15 pts (41.7%) presented PD. Median TTP was 14 months, with only 3 pts relapsing after 2 years from SCT. Eight pts who had PD and one patient who had a PR post-SCT received short-term anti-CLL therapy for disease debulking, followed by DLI. Six (66.6%) out of the 9 pts who received DLI achieved CR and are currently alive and in CR. Median follow-up post-DLI was 43 months and median duration of response to DLI was 47 mos (range 6-85 mos). Ultimately, 13 (36.1%) pts died, 8 (22.2%) were lost to follow-up, and 15 (41.7%) were alive at last contact. Disease progression was the most common cause of death (5 pts, 13.9%). Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 13.9% (3 deaths due to infection, 2 deaths due to chronic GVHD). Only 2 deaths (5.5%) occurred during the first 100 days post-SCT, both due to infection. No deaths occurred due to acute GVHD. Median OS was 84 months. PFS (not accounting for pts who relapsed post-SCT but achieved CR with DLI) was 58% in the first year and 25% at five years. The median PFS was 19 months. Univariate and multivariate analysis of pre-SCT pt characteristics (age, time from Dx to SCT, number of therapies, stage, presence of adenopathy, MUD vs sib donor, cytogenetic abnormalities, ABO mismatch, disease status at SCT) did not show any statistically significant correlation with OS, PFS or GVHD rates. Conclusion: SCT remains the only curative option for CLL. Our experience shows that pts may achieve long-term survival with this approach. TRM was low (13.8%) and rates of acute and chronic GVHD were compatible with previous reports (Sorror et al, JCO 2005; Dreger et al, Blood 2010). Type of donor (MUD vs sib) did not impact outcomes, suggesting that patients without a matched sibling should not be denied transplantation if a MUD is available. Although 47% of the patients eventually progressed after transplantation, 66% of patients who received DLI for salvage were able to achieve CR and remain progression-free for a prolonged period of time, underlining the importance of the GVL effect. Most relapses occurred within the first 2 years post SCT and late relapses were rare. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures Skarbnik: Gilead Sciences: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Vesole:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Goy:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Writing support, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Infinity: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feldman:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Leslie:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Leslie:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Anti- T Lymphocyte Globulin (ATLG) to Assess Impact on Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) Free Survival in Patients Undergoing HLA Matched Unrelated Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.505.505 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 505-505 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Robert J. Soiffer ◽

Haesook T. Kim ◽

Joseph McGuirk ◽

Mitchell E. Horwitz ◽

Laura Johnston ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Myeloablative Conditioning ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Double Blind ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Background: Chronic GVHD contributes to morbidity and mortality after allogeneic transplantation. Several phase 2 and 3 open label studies suggested that ATLG (formerly referred to as ATG-F) reduces cGVHD without impacting relapse or survival. This report describes the first prospective randomized double blind phase 3 trial to assess the effect of ATLG (Neovii) when added to tacrolimus / methotrexate prophylaxis on cGVHD free survival. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted at 27 sites in the United States and Australia. 260 patients were randomized (132 placebo, 128 ATLG). 6 patients who were randomized never received ATLG/placebo (4 placebo and 2 ATLG). Data presented include the 128 placebo and 126 ATLG patients who underwent treatment and transplant. Patients were ages 18-65 years with a diagnosis of acute myeloid (AML, 64%) or lymphoblastic (ALL, 21%) leukemia in first or subsequent complete remission or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, 15%) with less than 10% marrow blasts. Median age was 48 years (18-65) with 55% males. All patients received 8/8 HLA (A, B, C, DR) allele matched unrelated products (80% mobilized peripheral blood, 20% bone marrow). Myeloablative conditioning was with cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation (Cy/TBI, 27%), busulfan and cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy, 33%), or busulfan and fludarabine (Bu/Flu, 40%). All patients received tacrolimus starting on Day -1 and standard mtx on days 1, 3, 6, and 11 for GVHD prophylaxis. Patients received ATLG or placebo on Days -3, -2, -1 at an ATLG dose of 20 mg/kg per day (60 mg/kg total). The primary endpoint of the study was moderate/severe chronic GVHD free survival. cGVHD was scored by the investigator and then confirmed or overturned by an independent adjudication committee. Secondary endpoints included engraftment, acute GVHD , moderate/severe cGVHD, non-relapse mortality, GVHD and relapse free survival (GRFS), progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The impact of ATLG on immune reconstitution was assessed in 91 patients. Results: Treatment arms were balanced with respect to age, diagnosis, remission status, cytogenetics, graft source (PB or BM), CMV serostatus and conditioning regimen. Median follow up of survivors was 745 days (61, 1425). Regarding the primary endpoint, there was no difference in 2 year moderate/severe cGVHD free survival between ATLG and placebo (48 vs 44%, p = 0.57), nor was there a difference in GRFS (Table 1). Neutrophil engraftment at Day 30 was less in the ATLG arm (85% vs 95%, p=0.00001). Grade 2 or higher infusion reactions were higher in the ATLG arm (16% vs 2.3%, p=0.0001). Reactivation of CMV was similar (27% vs 31%, p=0.58). The Day 180 cumulative incidence of grades 2-4 acute GVHD was lower in the ATLG arm (23 vs 40%, p = 0.003) as was the 2-year cumulative incidence of moderate/severe cGVHD (12 vs 33%, p = 0.000006). However, both 2-year OS and PFS were lower in ATLG treated patients (58 v 76% and 47 vs 67%, respectively) due in part to a higher incidence of relapse (32 vs 19%, p=0.068). Multivariable models confirmed that ATLG was associated with inferior OS, HR 1.85 (1.1-2.9, p=.0075) and PFS, HR 1.63 (1.1-2.41, p=0.015). We then conducted an unplanned post-hoc analysis and discovered a striking influence of conditioning regimen on outcomes. There were no differences in OS or PFS between ATLG and placebo arms in patients receiving Bu/Cy or Bu/Flu but a dramatic difference in patients receiving Cy/TBI conditioning (OS, 88% vs 48% p =0.006 and PFS, 75 vs 29%, p=0.007 in placebo and ATLG arms, respectively). 91 patients (44 ATLG, 47 placebo) participated in the immune reconstitution study. ATLG treatment was associated with lower CD3, CD4, and CD8 counts at Days 30, 100, and 360, respectively. In turn lower CD3, CD4, and CD8 counts assessed as time dependent variables were all associated with inferior OS and PFS as well as higher NRM (data not shown). Conclusion: In this first ever prospective, randomized, double blind trial of ATLG added to tacrolimus /methotrexate in recipients of matched unrelated donor grafts after myeloablative conditioning, there was no significant difference in 2 year moderate/severe cGVHD free survival or GRFS. ATLG did significantly reduce grades 2-4 acute and moderate/severe chronic GVHD. However, overall survival was higher in the placebo arm, driven mainly by patients who received Cy/TBI conditioning. Further analyses are needed to understand the proper role for ATLG in HCT. Disclosures Soiffer: Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porter:Genentech: Employment; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Jagasia:Therakos: Consultancy. Szer:Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ra Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ritz:Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Glavin:Neovii Biotech: Employment. Chen:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Comparable Outcomes between Unrelated Donor (8/8 or 7/8 matched) and Haploidentical Donor for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130419 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4619-4619

Author(s):

Jee Yon Shin ◽

Sung-Soo Park ◽

Gi June Min ◽

Silvia Park ◽

Sung-Eun Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Sibling Donor ◽

Alternative Donor ◽

Matched Sibling ◽

Grade Ii

Background Either allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) from HLA-matched sibling donor or immunosuppressive therapy (IST) has been recommended as one of the standard treatments for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Regarding only 30% of chance finding HLA‐matched sibling donor, SCT from an alternative donor including unrelated (URD) or haplo-identical related donor (HAPLO) is considered to be a treatment option after failure to IST in patients who lack of a HLA-matched sibling donor. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of URD SCT and HAPLO SCT for SAA patients. Method Consecutive 152 adult patients with SAA who received first SCT between March 2002 and May 2018 were included: 73 of HLA-well-matched (8/8) URD (WM-URD), 34 of HLA-mismatched URD (MM-URD), and 45 of HAPLO. With the intention to have a follow-up period at least 1 year, data were analyzed at May 2019. A conditioning regimen with total body irradiation (TBI) and cyclophosphamide was used for URD-SCT, whereas that with TBI and fludarabine was administered for HAPLO-SCT (Lee et al, BBMT 2011;17:101, Park et al, BBMT 2017;23:1498, Lee et al, Am J Hematol 2018;93:1368). The combination of tacrolimus and methotrexate were used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Results The median follow-up was 53.4 (range, 0.2-174.1) months. The median age of URD and HAPLO cohort was 30 (range 18-59) and 34 (range 18-59) years, respectively. Except for one and three patients who failed respective a neutrophil and platelet engraftment, other patients achieved neutrophil and platelet engraftments with median 11 and 15 days for WM-URD, 13 and 16.5 days for MM-URD, and 12 and 14 days for HAPLO, respectively. The five-years overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and cumulative incidences (CIs) of graft-failure and transplant-related mortality were similar among three groups: 88.3%, 85.5%, 2.7%, and 11.7% for WM-URD; 81.7%, 81.7%, 0%, and 18.3% for MM-URD, and 86.3%, 84.1%, 6.7%, and 9.2% for HAPLO. The 180-days CI of grade II-IV acute GVHD in WM-URD, MM-URD and HAPLO were 35.6%, 52.9%, and 28.9%, respectively; and moderate to severe chronic GVHD were 28.7%, 38.7% and 11.8% in respective cohort. The CI of grade II-IV acute GVHD and moderate to severe chronic GVHD were significantly higher in MM-URD than those in HAPLO (both, p=0.026). ATG is the only factor affecting both grade II-IV acute GVHD (Hazard ratio 0.511, p=0.01) and moderate to severe chronic GVHD (Hazard ratio 0.378, p=0.003) in multivariate analysis. Other complications including CMV DNAemia, hemorrhagic cystitis, invasive fungal disease, secondary malignancy, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome were similar among three groups. Survival outcomes of a subgroup of ≥ 2 allele MM-URD (n=16) extracted form MM-URD were inferior that of other donor types (n=136): 75.0% vs. 86.9% (p=0.163) for 5-year OS and 75.0% vs. 84.7% (p=0.272) for 5-year FFS. Conclusion This study shows that there were no significant differences between alternative donor sources in the absence of suitable matched sibling donor. Host/donor features and urgency of transplant should drive physician towards the best choice among alternative donor sources for SAA patients treated with SCT. However, selection of ≥ 2 allele MM-URD should not be recommended due to high incidence of GVHD and inferior outcomes. Figure Disclosures Kim: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Hanmi: Consultancy, Honoraria; AGP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SL VaxiGen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Yuhan: Honoraria; Sanofi-Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Handok: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BL & H: Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria. Lee:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Achillion: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Higher Incidence of Hemorrhagic Cystitis after Haploidentical Compared to Matched Sibling Donor Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119612 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3380-3380

Author(s):

Srinivasa Reddy Sanikommu ◽

Olivia Copelan ◽

Jiaxian He ◽

Candace M. Butler ◽

Michael R. Grunwald ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Hemorrhagic Cystitis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Conditioning Regimens ◽

Matched Sibling ◽

Donor Source ◽

Severe Grade

Abstract Introduction: Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) causes significant morbidity following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Reactivation of BK polyoma virus frequently occurs following transplantation and appears to be the most commonly associated factor, although high dose cyclophosphamide, other viruses, and numerous other factors contribute. A higher incidence of BK HC was reported with the use of matched unrelated or cord blood donors compared to HLA-matched siblings (El-Zimaity M, et al. Blood. 2004), however, the intensity of GVHD prevention regimens varied according to cell source complicating interpretation of these data. The effect of HLA-mismatched donors on the incidence of BK HC has been disputed and a large study of mismatched donors detected no association of HC with mismatched compared to matched donors (Giraud G, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2008; Gilis L, et al. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2014.) We analyzed a cohort of patients biologically assigned to matched sibling (MSD) or haploidentical family donor (based on presence of a suitable MSD donor) who received identical myeloablative or nonablative conditioning regimens and identical PTCy-based GVHD prevention to directly analyze the association of donor source with HC. Methods : To evaluate the role of haploidentical vs MSD donor source, we analyzed all patients undergoing haploidentical or MSD HCT at the Levine Cancer Institute between March 2014 and June 2018. Patients received identical myeloablative (BuCy) or nonmyeloablative (Flu/Cy/TBI) conditioning regimens followed by peripheral blood stem cell grafts and identical PTCy-based regimens which included tacrolimus and mycophenolate for GVHD prevention. The cumulative incidence of HC was calculated in a competing risk setting with death from any cause as a competing event. Group comparisons of incidences were determined by a Gray's test. Cox regression was conducted to evaluate risk factors for the development of HC. It was also used to evaluate HC as a time-dependent risk factor for overall survival. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze categorical patient characteristics, and two-sample t-test was employed for continuous variables. Results : From March 2014 to June 2018, 39 patients (32%) underwent MSD transplantation and 84 patients (68%) received transplants from haploidentical donors. Baseline characteristics were similar except for younger donor age of haploidentical donors (median 40 yrs vs 54 yrs P< .001). The rates of acute GVHD, Chronic GVHD, NRM and overall survival were similar between the two groups. The cumulative incidence of HC was higher in patients who received cells from haploidentical donors when compared to matched related donors (p=0.05). In multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with HC (Table 1), haploidentical donor (HR: 1.80, 95% CI 0.95-3.44, P= .07) and, grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR: 4.93, 95% CI 1.01-23.93 P = .05), were associated with development of HC. 33/53 HC patients (62%) were tested positive for BK virus. The intensity of the conditioning regimen, disease status at transplant, donor and recipient age were not associated with development of HC. For patients who received cells from haploidentical donors, there was a trend towards severe (grade 3-4) HC, but this did not reach statistical significance (HR 2.71, 95% CI 0.59-12.24 P=.19). The incidence of HC was not associated with overall survival (HR 0.58 95% CI 0.3-1.15 P=0.12), even when severe (grade III-IV) HC events were evaluated (HR 1.79 95% CI 0.75-4.3 P=0.19). Conclusions: In adults undergoing allogenic transplantations using identical conditioning regimens and PTCy based GVHD prevention, the use of a haploidentical donor results in a higher incidence of HC than does a MSD. Disclosures Grunwald: Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medtronic: Equity Ownership; Genentech: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding. Jacobs:Genentech: Honoraria. Usmani:Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Genmab, Merck, MundiPharma, Janssen, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Pharmacyclics,Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda: Research Funding.

Download Full-text