AML Induction Therapy with Outpatient Azacitidine.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1800-1800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard K. Shadduck ◽  
James M. Rossetti ◽  
Yacoub Faroun ◽  
Robert B. Kaplan ◽  
John Lister

Abstract 15 patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia were treated with outpatient 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (azacitidine, 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously for seven days every four weeks) as primary induction therapy. The average age was 68 years (range = 44–80). Bone marrow blast counts ranged between 20% and 38%. The overall response rate (complete remission, CR + parital remission, PR) was 53% (8/15). CR was achieved in 4 patients (27%) in an average of 3 cycles (range = 2–5). Duration of response averaged 8 cycles (range = 6–13) from the time CR was documented. Two of these patients went on to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (one in CR, one in PR). PR was achieved in 4 patients (27%) in an average of 3 cycles (range = 2–3). Duration of response averaged 7 cycles (range = 1–15) from the time PR was documented. Two patients continue therapy, maintaining PR, at 9 and 15 cycles. One patient met criteria for stable disease with a survival of 17 months. One patient with biphenotypic leukemia survived 12 months with a significant reduction in transfusion requirements. One patient demonstrated a major platelet response, but discontinued therapy after 3 cycles due to anorexia. Four patients had disease progression after 1, 1, 2, and 3 cycles. The average survival for patients who achieved at least stable disease and did not go on to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was 14+ months (range = 8–24). None of the responders had an ECOG performance status worse than 1 while being treated. The most common toxicity was febrile neutropenia (4 patients, 2 deaths). Azacitidine administered in the outpatient setting can induce remission in AML. This therapy appears to be well tolerated. Further study is warranted in poor risk patients to document activity and toxicity.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4973-4973
Author(s):  
Elias H. Atta ◽  
Cláudia J.P.B. Coelho ◽  
Silvia M.P. Sarcinelli ◽  
Cláudia A. Máximo ◽  
Alexandre M. Azevedo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Early absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery after autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been reported as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival and progression-free survival for patients with hematological and non-hematological cancers. Early immune reconstitution appears to have a protective effect against residual disease after ASCT. End points: Assessment of factors impacting on early ALC recovery after ASCT. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the ASCT procedures done between 2000 and 2007 in Hemorio. Early lymphocyte recovery (ELR) was defined as an ALC ≥500/μL at day 12 after ASCT. Results: A total of 53 of 66 consecutive ASCT (80,3%) were eligible for this study. Of the 53 ASCT, 9 were for lymphoma, 22 for multiple myeloma and 22 for acute myelogenous leukemia. Median age of the group was 34 years (range: 13–65). All patients except one were mobilized with chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). ELR was observed in 41% of the patients. Univariate analysis identified an association between the following factors and ELR: median pre-mobilization ALC (1920 vs 1060 lymphocytes/μL; p=0.003), pre-collection ALC (1637 vs 747 lymphocytes/μL; p<0.001), dose of leukocytes infused (1.21 x 109 vs 0.65 x 109 leukocytes/kg; p=0.002), dose of lymphocytes infused (0.26 x 109 vs 0.10 x 109 lymphocytes/kg; p<0.001), dose of CD4+ lymphocytes infused (0.075 x 109 vs 0.034 x 109 CD4+ lymphocytes/kg; p<0.001) and dose of CD8+ lymphocytes infused (0.11 x 109 vs 0.03 x 109 CD8+ lymphocytes/kg; p<0.001) were all higher in the ELR group. Patient diagnosis, number of previous cycles of chemotherapy and number of CD34+ cells collected were not correlated with ELR. Forward stepwise regression identified the pre-mobilization ALC and the number of lymphocytes in the autograft as factors related to ELR (p=0.013 and p<0.001; respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the lymphocyte dose in the graft can be predicted by the pre-collection ALC and the number of aphereses carried out (p<0.001 for both). Median pre-mobilization ALC was higher than pre-collection ALC (1335 vs 975 lymphocytes/μL respectively; p=0.013). This difference was most significant in the group of patients without ELR (1060 vs 747 lymphocytes/μL respectively; p=0.004). Among patients with ELR, the difference was not significant (1920 vs 1637 lymphocytes/μL respectively; p=0.53). Conclusions: These results indicate that ELR after ASCT depends on the pre-mobilization ALC and the lymphocyte dose in the autograft. The number of aphereses performed for stem cell collection and the pre-collection ALC predict the number of lymphocytes collected. Stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF significantly reduces the ALC at the time of collection, specially in patients with lower ALC at the time of the mobilization. Strategies to improve immunologic recovery may have an impact on the results of ASCT. Figure Figure


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1396-1396
Author(s):  
Loretta A Williams ◽  
Karen O Anderson ◽  
Xin Shelley Wang ◽  
Charles S Cleeland ◽  
Tito R Mendoza ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1396 Poster Board I-418 Introduction: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an intensive therapy that may cure or control a variety of hematological malignancies. Although the toxicities associated with HSCT are well-described, patient report of symptom burden is rarely addressed. Lack of understanding of symptoms may result in failure to address symptoms and return patients to optimum functioning. Differences in the pattern of symptom burden between autologous (auto) and allogeneic (allo) HSCT and the special needs for symptom management that each type of therapy may require has not been addressed. The purpose of this study was to compare the symptom burden of patients undergoing allo- and auto-HSCT. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of a combined data set of 155 patients from 3 longitudinal studies exploring the symptom burden of HSCT. Patients used modified versions of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) to rate the severity of their symptoms (13 items) and the degree to which their symptoms interfered with daily living (6 items) on a 0–10 scale. Patients completed the MDASI at baseline, during conditioning therapy, on day of transplant, twice weekly for 4 weeks, and 1 to 2 times weekly for another 10 weeks. Symptom burden was measured as the area under the curve (AUC) of the mean MDASI symptom severity from baseline to 14 weeks post-HSCT. Results: Average age of the allo-HSCT patients was 52.9 years, whereas the auto-HSCT patients averaged 53.2 years. The allo- and auto-HSCT patients were 57% and 69% male, respectively, and 73% and 82% Caucasian, respectively. All allo-HSCT patients were being treated for acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodyspalastic syndrome; 66% of the auto-HSCT patients had multiple myeloma and 26% had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. All allo-HSCT patients received short-course methotrexate as part of their graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Symptom severity peaked during the Week 1 post-HSCT for the auto-HSCT patients and Week 2 for the allo-HSCT patients. Three of the most severe symptoms experienced by both groups were lack of appetite, fatigue, and physical weakness. Other most severe symptoms experienced by the auto-HSCT patients were feeling physically sick and nausea. The other most severe symptoms reported by the allo-HSCT patients were pain and difficulty sleeping. Figure 1 shows the symptom burden of the 7 most severe symptoms combined for the two groups. Peak symptom severity was highest for the auto-HSCT group, but the overall AUC and symptom burden was greater for the allo-HSCT group because they remained more symptomatic throughout the 14 weeks of the study, whereas the auto-HSCT patients had returned to baseline levels by the end of 8 weeks. Although sore mouth was not one of the most severe symptoms, the auto-HSCT patients reported significantly more sore mouth during Week 1 post-HSCT (p ≤ 0.002), whereas the allo-HSCT patients reported significantly more sore mouth the second week (p ≤ 0.001). During Week 2, pain severity was significantly greater for the allo-HSCT patients than for the auto-HSCT patients (p ≤ 0.001), while diarrhea was significantly more severe for the auto-HSCT patients than for the allo-HSCT patients (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: Although patients undergoing auto-HSCT experience more severe acute symptoms from the conditioning regimen, they return to baseline symptom levels several weeks after HSCT. Allo-HSCT patients experience a slightly later peak in symptoms, mostly likely due to the effects of GVHD methotrexate prophylaxis, and continue to experience increased symptom burden up to 3 months post-HSCT, likely due to the development of GVHD and infection complications. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document