scholarly journals Presumed consent for organ preservation in uncontrolled donation after cardiac death in the United States: a public policy with serious consequences

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph L Verheijde ◽  
Mohamed Y Rady ◽  
Joan McGregor
2010 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 408
Author(s):  
M. Stapfer ◽  
Y. W. Cho ◽  
L. Sher ◽  
I. V. Hutchinson ◽  
Y. Genyk

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric S. Orman ◽  
A. Sidney Barritt ◽  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
Paul H. Hayashi

2005 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 564-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Howard ◽  
Jesse D. Schold ◽  
Danielle L. Cornell

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 745-758
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Warnez ◽  

Organ donations after cardiac death account for about 20 percent of all vital-organ transplantations in the United States. This article evaluates DCDs in light of the Catholic moral tradition. Certain premortem interventions commonly associated with DCDs (intended to protect target organs from asystolic deterioration) are morally impermissible even though the injuries they inflict on the patient are ostensibly inconsequential. More importantly, the criteria used for expeditiously assaying circulatory death—criteria which enhance the effectiveness of DCDs—do not always guarantee that the donor is actually deceased. Unless DCD protocols attend to these ethical problems, Catholic hospitals are obliged to abandon the practice.


2008 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
pp. 1061-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Mason ◽  
Lucy Thuita ◽  
Joan M. Alster ◽  
Sudish C. Murthy ◽  
Marie M. Budev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document