scholarly journals Impact of discounts on medicine prices

Author(s):  
Peter Schneider ◽  
Sabine Vogler
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uthpali Mannapperuma ◽  
RohiniB.M Fernandopulle ◽  
GangaS.M.D.K Senarathna
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Vogler ◽  
Peter Schneider ◽  
Lena Lepuschütz

Abstract Background: Several governments apply the policy of external price referencing (EPR), which considers the prices of a medicine in one or more other countries for the purpose of setting the price in the own country. Different methodological choices can be taken to design EPR. The study aimed to analyse whether, or not, and how changes in the methodology of EPR can impact medicine prices.Methods: The real-life EPR methodology as of Q1/2015 was surveyed in all European Union Member States (where applicable), Iceland, Norway and Switzerland through a questionnaire responded by national pricing authorities. Different scenarios were developed related to the parameters of the EPR methodology. Discrete-event simulations of fictitious prices in the 28 countries of the study that had EPR were run over 10 years. The continuation of the real-life EPR methodology in the countries as surveyed in 2015, without any change, served as base case.Results: In most scenarios, after ten years, medicine prices in all or most surveyed countries were – sometimes considerably – lower than in the base case scenario. But in a few scenarios medicine prices increased in some countries. Consideration of discounts (an assumed 20% discount in five large economies and the mandatory discount in Germany, Greece and Ireland) and determining the reference price based on the lowest price in the country basket would result in higher price reductions (on average -47.2% and -34.2% compared to the base case). An adjustment of medicine price data of the reference countries by purchasing power parities would lead to higher prices in some more affluent countries (e.g. Switzerland, Norway) and lower prices in lower-income economies (Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Poland). Regular price revisions and changes in the basket of reference countries would also impact medicine prices, however to a lesser extent.Conclusions: EPR has some potential for cost-containment. Medicine prices could be decreased if certain parameters of the EPR methodology were changed. If public payers aim to apply EPR to keep medicine prices at more affordable levels, they are encouraged to explore the cost-containment potential of this policy by taking appropriate methodological choices in the EPR design.


2017 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 822-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch M Razzakova ◽  
L E Ziganshina

Aim. Performing comparative analysis of drug prices in 2011 and 2015 in Kazan to assess the effectiveness of state initiatives to ensure the affordability of medicines. Methods. The collection and processing of data was performed according to methodology developed by Health Action International and World Health Organization (WHO/HAI). We studied the availability and prices of 30 medicines in public and private pharmacies in Kazan in 2011 and 2015 and analyzed the procurement prices of the same medicines in inpatient hospitals. Recording and analysis were performed using standardized MS Excel WHO/HAI Workbook. Medicine prices were compared with international reference prices and were expressed as median price ratio. Results. The analysis showed a decrease in medicine prices in 2015 compared to 2011. In public and private sectors median price ratio of the originator brands reduced by about 3 times, and of the lowest price generics reduced by 1.5 times. A decrease in procurement prices by more than 2 times for generics and more than 6 times for the original brands was also revealed in 2015 in comparison with 2011. Conclusion. State initiatives to regulate drug prices contributed to the price reduction by 1.5-3 times in 2015 compared to 2011; changes in the procedures for the medicines procurement at the legislative level resulted in reduction of procurement prices by more than 2 times for generic drugs in 2015 compared to 2011.


Author(s):  
Zaheer Ud-din Babar ◽  
Rabia Hussain ◽  
Syed Shahzad Hasan
Keyword(s):  

The Lancet ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 388 (10060) ◽  
pp. 2602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad Saleem ◽  
Mohamed Azmi Hassali ◽  
Qaiser Iqbal ◽  
Marvi Baloch ◽  
Pathiyil Ravi Shanker
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Swathi Iyengar ◽  
Rianne van den Ham ◽  
Fatima Suleman
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guk-Hee Suh
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document