scholarly journals No impact of a massive transfusion protocol on coagulopathy and mortality at a level 1 trauma center: why?

Critical Care ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Bourassa-Fulop ◽  
J Chauny ◽  
J Paquet ◽  
R Daoust ◽  
E Notebaert
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Massive Transfusion ◽  
Massive Transfusion Protocol ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center ◽  
Transfusion Protocol

scholarly journals Effects of Massive Transfusion Protocol Implementation in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-80
Author(s):  
Hyun Woo Sun ◽  
Sang Bong Lee ◽  
Sung Jin Park ◽  
Chan Ik Park ◽  
Jae Hun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Massive Transfusion ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Protocol Implementation ◽  
Massive Transfusion Protocol ◽  
Level I ◽  
Transfusion Protocol

Improvement of Treatment Outcomes after Implementation of a Massive Transfusion Protocol: A Level I Trauma Center Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Nunn ◽  
Peter Fischer ◽  
Ronald Sing ◽  
Megan Templin ◽  
Michael Avery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Massive Transfusion ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Modest Improvement ◽  
Massive Transfusion Protocol ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Level I ◽  
Transfusion Protocol

We assessed the effectiveness of the implementation of an institutional massive transfusion protocol (MTP) for resuscitation with a 1:1:1 transfusion ratio of packed red blood cell (PRBC), fresh frozen plasma, and platelet units. In a Level I trauma center database, all trauma admissions (2004–2012) that received massive transfusions (≥10 units PRBCs in the first 24 hours) were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data, transfusion ratios, and outcomes were compared before (PRE) and after (POST) MTP implementation in May 2008. Age, sex, and mechanism of injury were similar between 239 PRE and 208 POST trauma patients requiring massive transfusion. Transfusion ratios of fresh frozen plasma:PRBC and platelet:PRBC increased after MTP implementation. Among survivors, MTP implementation shortened hospital length of stay from 31 to 26 days (P = 0.04) and intensive care unit length of stay from 31 to 26 days (P = 0.02). Linear regression identified treatment after (versus before) implementation of MTP as an independent predictor of decreased ventilator days after adjusting for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, and chest Abbreviated Injury Score (P < 0.0001). Modest improvement in ratios likely does not account for all significant improvements in outcomes. Implementing a standardized protocol likely impacts automation, efficiency, and/or timeliness of product delivery.

Implementation of Trauma Center and Massive Transfusion Protocol Improves Outcomes for Major Trauma Patients: A Study at a Single Institution in Korea

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 2067-2075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyungjin Hwang ◽  
Junsik Kwon ◽  
Jayun Cho ◽  
Yunjung Heo ◽  
John Cook-Jong Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Massive Transfusion ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Massive Transfusion Protocol ◽  
Transfusion Protocol

scholarly journals Ten‐year evolution of a massive transfusion protocol in a level 1 trauma centre: have outcomes improved?

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 1470-1474
Author(s):  
Jessica E. Meij ◽  
Leo M. G. Geeraedts Jr ◽  
Saskia J. M. Kamphuis ◽  
Nimmi Kumar ◽  
Tony Greenfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Massive Transfusion ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Massive Transfusion Protocol ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Transfusion Protocol

scholarly journals Evaluation of massive transfusion protocol practices by type of trauma at a level I trauma center

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roshan Givergis ◽  
Swapna Munnangi ◽  
Katayoun Fayaz M Fomani ◽  
Anthony Boutin ◽  
Luis Carlos Zapata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Massive Transfusion ◽  
Massive Transfusion Protocol ◽  
Level I ◽  
Transfusion Protocol
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document