scholarly journals Effect of lesion proximity on the regenerative response of long descending propriospinal neurons after spinal transection injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Swieck ◽  
Amanda Conta-Steencken ◽  
Frank A. Middleton ◽  
Justin R. Siebert ◽  
Donna J. Osterhout ◽  
...  
eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remi Ronzano ◽  
Camille Lancelin ◽  
Gardave Singh Bhumbra ◽  
Robert M Brownstone ◽  
Marco Beato

Motoneurons control muscle contractions, and their recruitment by premotor circuits is tuned to produce accurate motor behaviours. To understand how these circuits coordinate movement across and between joints, it is necessary to understand whether spinal neurons pre-synaptic to motor pools have divergent projections to more than one motoneuron population. Here, we used modified rabies virus tracing in mice to investigate premotor INs projecting to synergist flexor or extensor motoneurons, as well as those projecting to antagonist pairs of muscles controlling the ankle joint. We show that similar proportions of premotor neurons diverge to synergist and antagonist motor pools. Divergent premotor neurons were seen throughout the spinal cord, with decreasing numbers but increasing proportion with distance from the hindlimb enlargement. In the cervical cord, divergent long descending propriospinal neurons were found in contralateral lamina VIII, had large somata, were neither glycinergic, nor cholinergic, and projected to both lumbar and cervical motoneurons. We conclude that distributed spinal premotor neurons coordinate activity across multiple motor pools and that there are spinal neurons mediating co-contraction of antagonist muscles.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie R. Flynn ◽  
Victoria L. Conn ◽  
Kieran A. Boyle ◽  
David I. Hughes ◽  
Masahiko Watanabe ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 1290-1302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret J. Chandler ◽  
Jianhua Zhang ◽  
Chao Qin ◽  
Robert D. Foreman

Noxious stimulation of spinal afferents inhibits primate spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons in segments distant from the region of afferent entry. Inhibitory effects of cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent (CPSA) stimulation remain after C1 transection but disappear with spinal transection between C3 and C7. We hypothesized that spinal inhibitory effects produced by CPSA stimulation are processed by neurons in C1–C3 segments. One purpose of this study in anesthetized monkeys was to determine whether chemical activation of high cervical neurons reduced sacral STT cell responses to colorectal distension (CRD) and urinary bladder distension (UBD). First, effects and interactions of pelvic and cardiopulmonary visceral afferent inputs were determined in 10 monkeys on extracellular activity of sacral STT neurons recorded in deep dorsal horn. CRD and UBD increased activity in 95 and 91% of sacral STT neurons, respectively. CPSA and cardiopulmonary vagal stimulation decreased activity in 84 and 56% of STT neurons, respectively. CPSA stimulation decreased CRD-evoked activity in six of eight sacral STT neurons and decreased UBD-evoked activity in five of eight STT neurons tested. Excitatory amino acid application at C2 segment decreased CRD-evoked responses in 7 of 10 sacral STT neurons and decreased UBD-evoked responses in 9 of 12 STT neurons. The second purpose of this study was to examine responses of C1–C3 descending propriospinal neurons to stimulation of cardiopulmonary afferent fibers. If C1–C3 neurons process CPSA input to suppress STT transmission, then CPSA stimulation should excite C1–C3neurons with descending projections. Effects of thoracic vagus nerve stimulation also were examined. Vagal stimulation inhibits STT neurons in segments below C3 but excites C1–C3 STT neurons; we theorized that vagal inhibition of sensory transmission might relay in high cervical segments and, therefore, excite C1–C3 descending propriospinal neurons. Extracellular discharge rate was recorded for C1–C3 neurons antidromically activated from thoracic or lumbar spinal cord in 24 monkeys. CPSA stimulation increased activity of 16 of 45 neurons and inhibited one cell. Thoracic vagus stimulation increased activity of 20 of 43 neurons and inhibited one cell; stimulation of abdominal vagus fibers did not affect activity of six of six cells that were excited by thoracic vagal input. Mechanical stimulation of somatic fields excited 30 of 41 neurons tested. All neurons activated by visceral input received convergent somatic input from noxious pinch of somatic receptive fields that generally included the neck and upper body; 11 C1–C3 propriospinal neurons did not respond to any afferent input examined. Results of these studies were consistent with the idea that modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission might involve neuronal connections in high cervical segments.


1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 852-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. F. Hobbs ◽  
U. T. Oh ◽  
M. J. Chandler ◽  
Q. G. Fu ◽  
D. C. Bolser ◽  
...  

1. Lumbosacral spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons can be inhibited by noxious pinch of the contralateral hindlimb or either forelimb and by electrical stimulation of cardiopulmonary sympathetic, splanchnic, and hypogastric afferents. A previous study found that spinal transections between C2 and C4 sometimes abolished the inhibitory effect of spinal afferent input and sometimes left it intact. This suggested that propriospinal neurons in the C1 and C2 segments might mediate this effect. To test whether neurons in the C1 and C2 segments were involved in producing this inhibitory effect, the magnitude of the reduction in neural activity was measured in the same STT neuron before and after spinal transection at C1 or between C3 and C7. 2. All neurons were antidromically activated from the contralateral thalamus and thoracic spinal cord. For us to accept a neuron for analysis, the characteristics of the somatic input and the latency and shape of the antidromatic spike produced by spinal cord stimulation had to be the same before and after the spinal transection. Also, spinal transection often causes a marked increase in spontaneous cell activity, which may affect the magnitude of an inhibitory response. To avoid this confounding problem, a cell was accepted for analysis only if it showed marked inhibition of high cell activity evoked by somatic pinch before spinal transection. For analysis 13 STT neurons met these criteria: 6 neurons were in monkeys with C1 transections, and 7 neurons were in animals with transections between C3 and C7.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document