scholarly journals Endoscopic transpapillary drainage in disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome after acute pancreatitis and trauma: long-term outcomes in 31 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Chen ◽  
Yueping Jiang ◽  
Wei Qian ◽  
Qihong Yu ◽  
Yuanhang Dong ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB12
Author(s):  
Navroop Nagra ◽  
Richard A. Kozarek ◽  
Danielle La Selva ◽  
Shivanand Bomman ◽  
Rajesh Krishnamoorthi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Chong ◽  
Chathura Bathiya Ratnayake ◽  
Samantha Saikia ◽  
Manu Nayar ◽  
Kofi Oppong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is a complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the neck and body of the pancreas often manifesting as persistent pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) or external pancreatic fistula (EPF). This systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis aimed to review the definitions, clinical presentation, intervention, and outcomes for DPDS. Methods The PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases were systematically searched until February 2020 using the PRISMA framework. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the success rates of endoscopic and surgical interventions for the treatment of DPDS. Success of DPDS treatment was defined as long-term resolution of symptoms without recurrence of PFC, EPF, or pancreatic ascites. Results Thirty studies were included in the quantitative analysis comprising 1355 patients. Acute pancreatitis was the most common etiology (95.3%, 936/982), followed by chronic pancreatitis (3.1%, 30/982). DPDS commonly presented with PFC (83.2%, 948/1140) and EPF (13.4%, 153/1140). There was significant heterogeneity in the definition of DPDS in the literature. Weighted success rate of endoscopic transmural drainage (90.6%, 95%-CI 81.0–95.6%) was significantly higher than transpapillary drainage (58.5%, 95%-CI 36.7–77.4). Pairwise meta-analysis showed comparable success rates between endoscopic and surgical intervention, which were 82% (weighted 95%-CI 68.6–90.5) and 87.4% (95%-CI 81.2–91.8), respectively (P = 0.389). Conclusions Endoscopic transmural drainage was superior to transpapillary drainage for the management of DPDS. Endoscopic and surgical interventions had comparable success rates. The significant variability in the definitions and treatment strategies for DPDS warrant standardisation for further research.


2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB581-AB582
Author(s):  
Tomotaka Saito ◽  
Suguru Mizuno ◽  
Yousuke Nakai ◽  
Tatsunori Suzuki ◽  
Tatsuya Sato ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-211
Author(s):  
Petr Vaněk ◽  
Přemysl Falt ◽  
Ondřej Urban

Pancreatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. S32
Author(s):  
Andrea Jimenez ◽  
Rocio Sedano ◽  
Pablo Muñoz ◽  
Zoltan Berger

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Pandanaboyana ◽  
Eric Chong Jing Fu ◽  
Chathura Bathiya Ratnayake ◽  
Samantha Saikia ◽  
Manu Nayar ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundDisconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is a complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the neck and body of the pancreas often manifesting as persistent pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) or external pancreatic fistula (EPF). This systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis aim to review the definitions, clinical presentation, intervention, and outcomes for DPDS. MethodsThe PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases were systematically searched until February 2020 using the PRISMA framework. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the success rates of endoscopic and surgical interventions for the treatment of DPDS. Success of DPDS treatment was defined as long-term resolution of symptoms without recurrence of PFC, EPF, or pancreatic ascites.ResultsThirty studies were included in the quantitative analysis comprising 1355 patients. Acute pancreatitis was the most common etiology (95.2%, 918/964), followed by chronic pancreatitis (3.1%, 30/964). DPDS commonly presented with PFC (77.3%,728/942) and EPF (18.6%, 175/942). There was significant heterogeneity in the definition of DPDS in the literature. Weighted success rate of endoscopic transmural drainage (90.6%, 95%-CI: 81.0-95.6%) was significantly higher than transpapillary drainage (58.5%, 95%-CI 36.7-77.4). Pairwise meta-analysis showed comparable success rates between endoscopic and surgical intervention, which were 82% (weighted 95%-CI 68.6-90.5) and 87.4% (95%-CI 81.2-91.8), respectively (P=0.389). Conclusions Endoscopic transmural drainage was superior to transpapillary drainage for the management of DPDS. Endoscopic and surgical interventions had comparable success rates. The significant variability in the definitions and treatment strategies for DPDS warrant standardisation for further research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document