Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas: Need for a Tailored Approach to a Rare Entity

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is a relatively new entity that has gained increased attention because of its unique features – presence of different subtypes with different malignant potential, biological behavior, and prognosis, higher rates of recurrences and concomitant or metachronous pancreatic duct cancer. It is rare with an incidence of 4 to 5 cases per 100 000. The relative lack of experience significantly hampers decision making for surgery (pancreatic head resection, distal pancreatectomy or enucleation) or follow-up. Herein we present two cases managed by diametrically different tactic according to the risk stratification – distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and observation, respectively. An up-to-date literature review on the key points in diagnostics, indications for surgery, the extent of surgery, follow-up, and prognosis is provided. The tailored approach based on risk stratification is the cornerstone of management. Absolute indications for surgery are the lesions with high-risk stigmata, whereas the worrisome features should be evaluated by endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration. Main duct and mixed type are usually referred to surgery, whereas the management of a branch type is more conservative due to the lower rate of invasive cancer. Strict postoperative follow-up is mandatory even in negative resection margins due to a high risk for recurrences and metachronous lesions. Despite the guidelines, the intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm remains a major challenge for clinicians and surgeons in the balance the risk/benefit of observation versus resection. Risk stratification plays a key role in decision-making. Future trials need to determine the optimal period of surveillance and the most reliable predictive factors for concomitant pancreatic duct cancer.

Pancreatic duct stones and laser treatment: A case report

A 62 years-old Caucasian male, who had a consumptive condition associated with recurrent episodes of abdominal pain, was evaluated in a Gastroenterology consultation. Physical examination was quite innocent and the following imaging exams were performed. A Computed Tomography (CT) showed a thin gallbladder and chronic pancreatitis signs with pancreatic intraductal stones, dominant at tail and body, associated with pancreatic tail atrophy. An abdominal-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showed an abnormal pancreatic parenchyma, a mild Wirsung dilatation and an unknown pancreatic head stenosis etiology. Therefore, to clarify the pancreatic stenosis, an echo-endoscopy (EUS) was performed. This exam showed a 10-mmstone associated with a focal narrowing in the head/tail transition. A pancreatoscopy-guided holmium laser using a mini-endoscope inserted into the pancreatic duct successfully broke the impacted stone and cleared the obstruction, without complications. After that, endotherapy with plastic stents was repeatedly done, during the following 6 months. After endoscopic treatment, the patient recovered quite well, without any symptoms, without pancreatic stenosis and higher quality of life.

Application Analysis of Omental Flap Isolation and Modified Pancreaticojejunostomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy (175 Cases)

Background: To explore the application value of free omentum wrapping and modified pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).Methods: The clinical data of 175 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into 86 cases in group A (omental wrapping and modified pancreaticojejunostomy) and 89 cases in group B (control group). The incidence of pancreatic fistula and other related complications, inflammatory factors and survival rate were compared between the two groups.Results: The incidences of B/C pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, delayed bleeding, and reoperation in group A were lower than those in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The free omentum wrapping isolation and the modified pancreaticojejunostomy group drainage tube extubation time, open diet time and postoperative hospital stay were earlier than the control group (P <0.05). There were also statistically significant differences in CRP, IL-6, PCT inflammatory factors 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery as well as in postoperative survival rate.Univariate analysis showed that BMI, pancreatic duct diameter, greater omental flap isolation and modified pancreaticojejunostomy were related to the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after PD. Multivariate analysis showed that BMI≥24, pancreatic duct diameter less than 3mm, no greater omental flap isolation method and modified pancreaticojejunostomy were independent risk factors for pancreatic fistula (P<0.05).Conclusions: Wrapping and isolating with free greater omentum plus modified pancreaticojejunostomy can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula and related complications, inhibit the development of inflammation, and is conducive to the prognosis.

Postoperative Outcomes Analysis After Pancreatic Duct Occlusion: A Safe Option to Treat the Pancreatic Stump After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Low-Volume Centers

Background: Surgical resection is the only possible choice of treatment in several pancreatic disorders that included periampullar neoplasms. The development of a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the main complication. Despite three different surgical strategies that have been proposed–pancreatojejunostomy (PJ), pancreatogastrostomy (PG), and pancreatic duct occlusion (DO)–none of them has been clearly validated to be superior. The aim of this study was to analyse the postoperative outcomes after DO.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 56 consecutive patients who underwent Whipple's procedure from January 2007 to December 2014 in a tertiary Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit. After pancreatic resection in open surgery, we performed DO of the Wirsung duct with Cyanoacrylate glue independently from the stump characteristics. The mean follow-up was 24.5 months.Results: In total, 29 (60.4%) were men and 19 were (39.6%) women with a mean age of 62.79 (SD ± 10.02) years. Surgical indications were in 95% of cases malignant diseases. The incidence of POPF after DO was 31 (64.5%): 10 (20.8%) patients had a Grade A fistula, 18 (37.5%) Grade B fistula, and 3 (6.2%) Grade C fistula. No statistical differences were demonstrated in the development of POPF according to pancreatic duct diameter groups (p = 0.2145). Nevertheless, the POPF rate was significantly higher in the soft pancreatic group (p = 0.0164). The mean operative time was 358.12 min (SD ± 77.03, range: 221–480 min). Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who developed POPF (p &lt; 0.001). According to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification, seven of 48 (14.58%) patients were classified as CD III–IV. At the last follow-up, 27 of the 31 (87%) patients were alive.Conclusions: Duct occlusion could be proposed as a safe alternative to pancreatic anastomosis especially in low-/medium-volume centers in selected cases at higher risk of clinically relevant POPF.