scholarly journals Adherence and persistence rates of major antidiabetic medications: a review

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Seung U. Lee ◽  
Howard Lee

AbstractThe objective of this paper was to review the adherence and persistence rates of major antidiabetic medication classes (i.e., metformin, sulfonylureas, sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and thiazolidinediones) by summarizing the major findings of the studies published since 2017. In addition, we reported the potential causes for low adherence and persistence of antidiabetic medications. Based on the literature, the highest rate of adherence and persistence was consistently observed in metformin users. Second to metformin were sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Injectable therapies such as insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists trailed low on the adherence and persistence rates. To the best of our knowledge, no studies published since the year 2017 analyzed the adherence and persistence of thiazolidinediones independently. The most frequently cited cause for low adherence and persistence was the severity of adverse events. Baseline characteristics (e.g., baseline HbA1c level), demographic information (e.g., age, gender, or ethnicity), and comorbidity profiles also had significant impacts on adherence and persistence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 32-36
Author(s):  
Tat'yana Morgunova ◽  
Valentin Fadeev

This article is dedicated to the problem of glycaemic durability of drugs used in treatment of type 2 diabetes. The results of studies comparing durability of glycemic control as monotherapy or in combination of metformin with different drugs: dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sulfonylurea, inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 are shown. The article discusses the results of original research and meta-analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reimbursement Team

Clinical evidence suggests that Rybelsus should be reimbursed to treat type 2 diabetes in adults if it is used in addition to metformin or other antihyperglycemic agents and does not cost more than glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Rybelsus is more costly than most similar diabetes treatments. Rybelsus is expected to increase budgets by more than $38 million over 3 years. To account for the high treatment cost, the price of Rybelsus should be reduced. If Rybelsus is not reimbursed as an add-on treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes, there are several other alternative treatments available for these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document