scholarly journals Recurrent autoimmune hypophysitis treated with rituximab: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Kruse ◽  
Thomas Bastholm Olesen ◽  
Ljubo Markovic ◽  
Dorte Glintborg ◽  
Marianne Skovsager Andersen

Abstract Background Autoimmune hypophysitis is a rare condition that often results in enlargement of the pituitary gland and hypopituitarism due to inflammatory infiltration. Management of autoimmune hypophysitis can include long-term hormonal replacement and close control of the inflammatory pituitary mass. Mass-related symptoms in patients with autoimmune hypophysitis are treated with anti-inflammatory therapy, surgery, and/or radiotherapy. Case presentation We present a 25-year-old White man with visual field defects of the right eye, headache, and weight loss. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a sellar mass, and the patient underwent transcranial surgery. Histopathology revealed autoimmune hypophysitis with predominantly CD20 positive B-cell infiltration. Progression of visual field defects necessitated postoperatively anti-inflammatory treatment with prednisolone. Azathioprine was initiated under gradual tapering of prednisolone with stable conditions at first, but relapse followed after dose reduction. Therefore, rituximab treatment was initiated, which resulted in regression of the pituitary mass. Rituximab treatment was discontinued after 25 months. The patient has continuously been in remission for 4 years after rituximab treatment was stopped. Conclusion This case illustrates that rituximab might be an effective alternative treatment in B-cell predominant autoimmune hypophysitis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-339
Author(s):  
Vivek Bose ◽  
Patrizio Caturegli ◽  
Jens Conrad ◽  
Wael Omran ◽  
Stephan Boor ◽  
...  

The distinction between autoimmune hypophysitis and other non–hormone secreting pituitary masses is often difficult to determine with certainty without pituitary biopsy and pathological examination. To aid in this distinction, the authors recently published a clinicoradiological scoring system, which they used in the case of a 15-year-old girl presented here. The patient presented with headache, visual field defects, polydipsia, and polyuria, and she was found to have secondary hypogonadism and hypoadrenalism. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a pituitary mass of approximately 2 cm in diameter. Application of the clinicoradiological parameters gave a score of −6, which favored a diagnosis of hypophysitis over that of adenoma. The presence of pituitary autoantibodies substantiated the diagnosis of hypophysitis. The patient was treated conservatively with high-dose prednisolone, and her symptoms improved markedly. This case illustrates the utility of using a clinicoradiological score when autoimmune hypophysitis is suspected since it can identify patients who can be treated without the need for pituitary surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 223 ◽  
pp. 229-240
Author(s):  
Eren Ekici ◽  
Sasan Moghimi ◽  
Huiyuan Hou ◽  
James Proudfoot ◽  
Linda M. Zangwill ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Accornero ◽  
S Rinalduzzi ◽  
M Capozza ◽  
E Millefiorini ◽  
G C Filligoi ◽  
...  

Color visual field analysis has proven highly sensitive for early visual impairments diagnosis in MS, yet it has never attained widespread popularity usually because the procedure is difficult to standardize, the devices are costly, and the test is fatiguing. We propose a computerized procedure running on standard PC, cost effective, clonable, and easy handled. Two hundred and sixty-four colored patches subtending 18 angle of vision, with selected hues and low saturation levels are sequentially and randomly displayed on gray equiluminous background of the PC screen subtending 2486408 angle of vision. The subject is requested to press a switch at the perception of the stimulus. The output provides colored maps with quantitative information. Comparison between normals and a selected population of MS patients with no actual luminance visual field defects, showed high statistical difference.


Ophthalmology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1600-1611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Sawada ◽  
Makoto Araie ◽  
Makoto Ishikawa ◽  
Takeshi Yoshitomi

1992 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Zulauf ◽  
Joseph Caprioli

Neurology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 922-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kalviainen ◽  
I. Nousiainen ◽  
M. Mantyjarvi ◽  
E. Nikoskelainen ◽  
J. Partanen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document