scholarly journals Economic evaluation of patient navigation programs in colorectal cancer care, a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chloé Gervès-Pinquié ◽  
Anne Girault ◽  
Serena Phillips ◽  
Sarah Raskin ◽  
Mandi Pratt-Chapman
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18088-e18088
Author(s):  
Pascal Jean-Pierre

e18088 Background: Patient navigation (PN) is a model of health care coordination designed to ameliorate health disparities by reducing barriers to achieving optimal health outcomes. Systematic reviews that evaluate whether PN is associated with higher patient satisfaction with cancer care are lacking. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to synthesize evidence of comparative studies evaluating the effectiveness of PN programs to improve satisfaction with cancer-related care. We included studies reported in English that: 1) evaluated a PN intervention designed to increase satisfaction with cancer care; and 2) involved a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or observational design. We abstracted data from studies using standardized forms, and evaluated these studies for methodological quality. Data were summarized qualitatively and synthesized under a random effects model. Results: The initial search yielded 831 citations, of which 3 RCTs and 6 observational studies met inclusion criteria. These nine studies involving 4,200 surveyed patients revealed either a neutral or positive effect in patient satisfaction in the majority of studies of PN and cancer-related care. However, only 5 studies (1 RCT and 4 observational) had adequate datato include in the meta-analysis. Methodological quality of eight of the included studies ranged from weak to moderate to strong, with half rated as weak. Findings of the RCT showed a statistically significant increase in satisfaction with cancer care involving PN [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 2.30; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.79, 2.80, p < .001]. Pooled results from non-RCTs showed no significant association between PN and satisfaction with cancer-related care (SMD = 0.39; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.80, p = .06). Conclusions: More systematic reviews are needed to characterize the relationship between PN and satisfaction with cancer-related care across the cancer care continuum and across different types of cancer.


2007 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 070909172346001-??? ◽  
Author(s):  
Meenal Patwardhan ◽  
Deborah A. Fisher ◽  
Christopher R. Mantyh ◽  
Douglas C. McCrory ◽  
Michael A. Morse ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16509-e16509
Author(s):  
James Edward Ward ◽  
Keith Naylor ◽  
Blase N. Polite

e16509 Background: Disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes among underrepresented racial and ethnic minority patients continue to widen. We performed, and present here, the results of a systematic review of the literature evaluating interventions to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in CRC care. Methods: The MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles that focused on interventions to reduce disparities in CRC screening, treatment, survivorship and end-of-life care from 1950 to 2010. Studies included were those that evaluated interventions in US populations that were composed of ≥50% racial/ethnic minorities (or that included a specific sub-analysis by race/ethnicity). Results: Following the electronic search, abstract and full text review, and reference reviews; a total of thirty-three studies were included in our final analysis. All of these were related to CRC screening; no studies evaluating the rest of the cancer care continuum were found. Nineteen studies (58%) were randomized controlled trials, nine (27%) were pre-test/post-test analyses, and five (15%) were cohort studies. Thirteen studies (39%) targeted African-American populations, eight (24%) targeted Hispanics, two (6%) targeted Asian populations, seven (21%) included a mixed population of ethnic minorities, and three (9%) were listed as “non-white” or included a subgroup analysis. The main results related to the magnitude of the effect of these patient-directed, patient navigator, and provider-directed interventions on CRC screening is outlined in the table below. Conclusions: Patient education involving personal contact, patient navigation services, and provider-directed education and reminder systems can modestly improve adherence to CRC screening among minority patients. Further studies targeting the rest of the colon cancer care continuum are needed. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 166-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Keikes ◽  
Miriam Koopman ◽  
Pieter J. Tanis ◽  
Valery E.P.P. Lemmens ◽  
Cornelis J.A. Punt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document