Planned nerve preservation modifications to reduce positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
15599 Background: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) is increasingly being utilized for the treatment of localized prostate cancer at many centers. The main objective of RLRP is cancer control and preservation of erectile function with reduced positive surgical margin (PSM) rates. We evaluated the effect of a side-specific nerve preservation (NP)protocol which was implemented in June 2006 to help further reduce PSM rates. Methods: Between June-November 2006, 150 consecutive RLRPs were performed using select ipsilateral, NP techniques (interfascial, extrafascial and wide resection) based on pre-operative risk factors (clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score (GS), percentage of core number positive and maximal core cancer percentage). Prior to June 2006, only interfascial and wide resection were performed. The NP protocol, included ipsilateral extrafascial dissection in all patients with GS=7 with non-palpable disease. All patients with GS≤6, non-palpable disease and whose biopsy pathology demonstrated <33% of ipsilateral cores positive for cancer were offered interfascial dissection. Wide resection was performed for patients with palpable disease, GS≥8 and ≥66% of all ipsilateral biopsy cores positive for cancer. Pathological outcomes were compared with the 245 consecutive RLRP cases performed prior to June 2006, where more liberal interfascial NP was performed. Results: Relative to the modified NP group, mean patient age (60 vs 59, p= 0.21), PSA (6.7 vs 6.8, p=0.77), clinical stage (p=0.93), biopsy Gleason score (p=0.51), pathologic Gleason score (p=0.32) and stage (p=0.65) were similar to the control group. Mean total number of positive cores involved with cancer were also comparable between groups (3.5 vs 3.3, p=0.31). Overall PSM rate was significantly lower in the modified NP group (12.6% vs 20.4%,p=0.04). Specific pT2-PSM rates were significantly lower (8.3% vs 15%, p=0.04) while only a trend was observed for pT3-PSM rates (34.5% vs 40.4%, p=0.60) in the modified NP group. Conclusions: Modifying ipsilateral nerve preservation for patients undergoing RLRP, based on specific pre-operative variables has significantly helped further reduce overall and pT2-specific PSM rates. No significant financial relationships to disclose.