Limited Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate on Needle Core Biopsy

Context.— Grading small foci of prostate cancer on a needle biopsy is often difficult, yet the clinical significance of accurate grading remains uncertain. Objective.— To assess if grading of limited adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy specimen is critical. Design.— We studied 295 consecutive patients undergoing extended-sextant biopsy with only 1-core involvement of adenocarcinoma, followed by radical prostatectomy. Results.— The linear tumor lengths on these biopsy specimens were: less than 1 mm (n = 114); 1 mm or more or less than 2 mm (n = 82); 2 mm or more or less than 3 mm (n = 35); and 3 mm or more (n = 64). Longer length was strongly associated with higher Grade Group (GG) on biopsy or prostatectomy specimen, higher risk of extraprostatic extension/seminal vesicle invasion and positive surgical margin, and larger estimated tumor volume. When cases were compared based on biopsy specimen GG, higher grade was strongly associated with higher prostatectomy specimen GG, higher incidence of pT3/pT3b disease, and larger tumor volume. Outcome analysis further showed significantly higher risks for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with 1 mm or more, 2 mm or more, 3 mm or more, GG2-4, GG3-4, GG4, less than 1 mm/GG2-4, less than 1 mm/GG3-4, less than 2 mm/GG3-4, 3 mm or more/GG2-4, or 3 mm or more/GG3-4 tumor on biopsy specimens, compared with respective control subgroups. In particular, 3 mm or more, GG3, and GG4 on biopsy specimens showed significance as independent prognosticators by multivariate analysis. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the rate of upgrading or downgrading after radical prostatectomy among those subgrouped by biopsy specimen tumor length (eg, <1 mm [44.7%] versus ≥1/<2 mm [41.5%] versus ≥2/<3 mm [45.7%] versus ≥3 mm [46.9%]). Conclusions.— These results indicate that pathologists still need to make maximum efforts to grade relatively small prostate cancer on biopsy specimens.

The Clinical Significance of Perineural Invasion by Prostate Cancer on Needle Core Biopsy

Context.— Perineural invasion (PNI) by prostate cancer has been associated with adverse pathology, including extraprostatic extension. However, the significance of PNI quantification on prostate biopsy (PBx) remains unclear. Objective.— To compare radical prostatectomy (RP) findings and long-term outcomes in patients whose PBx had exhibited PNI. Design.— We assessed 497 consecutive patients undergoing sextant (6-site/≥12-core) PBx showing conventional adenocarcinoma followed by RP. Results.— PNI was found in 1 (n = 290)/2 (n = 132)/3 (n = 47)/4 (n = 19)/5 (n = 5)/6 (n = 4) of the sites/regions of PBx. Compared with a single PNI site, multiple PNIs were significantly associated with higher preoperative prostate-specific antigen, higher Grade Group (GG) on PBx or RP, higher pT or pN category, positive surgical margin, and larger estimated tumor volume. When compared in subgroups of patients based on PBx GG, significant differences in RP GG (GG1–3), pT (GG1–2/GG1–3/GG2/GG3), surgical margin status (GG1–3/GG3/GG5), or tumor volume (GG1–2/GG1–3/GG2/GG3) between 1 versus multiple PNIs were observed. Moreover, there were significant differences in prostate-specific antigen (PNI sites: 1–2 versus 3–6/1–3 versus 4–6/1–4 versus 5–6), RP GG (1–3 versus 4–6/1–4 versus 5–6), pT (1–2 versus 3–6/1–3 versus 4–6), pN (1–3 versus 4–6), or tumor volume (1–2 versus 3–6/1–4 versus 5–6). Outcome analysis revealed significantly higher risks of disease progression in the entire cohort or PBx GG1–2/GG1–3/GG2/GG3/GG5 cases showing 2 to 6 PNIs, compared with respective controls with 1-site PNI. In multivariate analysis, multisite PNI was an independent predictor for progression (hazard ratio = 1.556, P = .03). Conclusions.— Multiple sites of PNI on PBx were associated with worse histopathologic features in RP specimens and poorer prognosis. PNI may thus need to be specified, if present, in every sextant site on PBx, especially those showing GG1–3 cancer.

Optimal Surveillance of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas Focusing on Remnant Pancreas Recurrence After Surgical Resection

Background: The international consensus guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) presented clinical features as indications for surgery. Whereas surveillance for recurrence including de novo lesions is essential, optimal surveillance protocols have not been established.Aim and Methods: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical features of recurrence at the remnant pancreas (Rem-Panc) and extra-pancreas (Ex-Panc) after surgery for IPMN. Ninety-one cases of IPMN that underwent detailed preoperative assessment and pancreatectomy were retrospectively analyzed, focusing especially on the type of recurrence.Results: The IPMNs were finally diagnosed as low-grade dysplasia (LDA, n=42), high-grade dysplasia (HAD, n=19), and invasive carcinoma (IPMC, n=30). Recurrence was observed in 26 cases (28%), of which recurrence was seen at Rem-Panc in 19 cases and at Ex-Panc in 7 cases. The frequency of Rem-Panc recurrence was 10% in LDA, 21% in HDA, and 37% in IPMC. On the other hand, Ex-Panc recurrence was observed only in IPMC (23%). Ex-Panc recurrence showed shorter median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than Rem-Panc recurrence (median RFS 8 months vs 35 months, p<0.001; median OS 25 months vs 72 months, p<0.001). Regarding treatment for Rem-Panc recurrence, repeat pancreatectomy resulted in better OS than no-pancreatectomy (MST 36 months vs 15.5 months, p=0.03). On multivariate analysis, main duct stenosis or disruption as a preoperative feature (hazard ratio [HR] 10.6, p=0.002) and positive surgical margin (HR 4.4, p=0.018) were identified as risk factors for Rem-Panc recurrence.Conclusions: The risk factors for Rem-Panc and Ex-Panc recurrence differ. Optimal surveillance based on these features is desirable to ensure that repeat pancreatectomy for Rem-Panc recurrence can be an appropriate surgical intervention.

Single-Port versus Multiple-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy has been reported as a safe and feasible technique. However, recent studies comparing single-port versus multiple-port robotic radical prostatectomy have displayed conflicting results. Objectives: To investigate the benefit of single-port robotic radical prostatectomy and the impact on outcome compared to multiple-port robotic radical prostatectomy. Methods: Based on PRISMA and AMSTAR criteria, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out. Finally, we considered the controlled studies with two cohorts (one cohort for single-port RARP and the other cohort for multiple-port RARP). For statistical analysis, Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.4 was used. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results: Five non-randomized controlled studies with 666 patients were included. Single-port robotic radical prostatectomy was associated with shorter hospital stays. Only 60.6% of single-port patients (109/180) required analgesia compared to 90% (224/249) of multiple-port patients (Z = 3.50; p = 0.0005; 95% CI 0.07:0.47). Opioid administration was also significantly lower in single-port patients, 26.2% (34/130) vs. 56.6% (77/136) (Z = 4.90; p < 0.00001; 95% CI 0.15:–0.44) There was no significant difference in operative time, blood loss, complication rate, positive surgical margin rate, or continence at day 90. Conclusion: The available data on single-port robotic radical prostatectomy is very limited. However, it seems comparable to the multiple-port platform in terms of short-term outcomes when performed with expert surgeons. Single-port prostatectomies might provide a shorter hospital stay and a lower requirement for opioids; however, randomized trials with long-term follow-up are mandatory for valid comparisons.

P-P42 Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A UK Tertiary Surgical Oncology Centre Series

Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a historically poor long-term survival of 5-10%, despite surgical resection. Borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) is reported as potentially resectable disease with a degree of vascular involvement, increasing the risk of a positive surgical margin. This cohort of patients have the worst survival despite curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Emerging evidence suggests that neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (NCR) improves R0 resection rates in BR-PDAC patients. We evaluated the R0 resection rate, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in our patients, who had undergone NCR for BR-PDAC at our institution. Methods Data was collected retrospectively for all patients undergoing NCR for BR-PDAC between Jan 2010 to Mar 2020 for this study. Surgical management was ratified by clinical assessment and cross-sectional imaging in a pancreatic multidisciplinary team meeting (MDM). Patients underwent NCR by a number of standardised regimens. Patients with proven regressive or stable disease on imaging underwent a pancreatic resection. All BR-PDAC patients underwent resection in the form of classical Whipple’s or pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) depending on intra-operative findings. Patient morbidity, R0 resection rate, histological parameters, DFS and OS were evaluated. Results 29 patients were included in the study (16 men and 13 women), with a median age of 65 years (range, 46-74 years). 17 patients received FOLFIRINOX and 12 patients received gemcitabine (GEM) based NCR regimens. All patients received chemoradiation at the end of chemotherapy (range 45-56Gy). 75% had an R0 resection, with a greater proportion in the FOLFIRINOX group. Whole cohort median DFS was 35 months, survival was superior in the FOLFIRINOX group (42 months). Median OS was 30 months for the whole group, with a greater median OS in the FOLFIRINOX versus the GEM cohort (42 versus 29 months). Conclusions We present a single centre retrospective study utilising NCR for BR-PDAC, we reiterate the strong association of an R0 resection with superior patient overall survival following surgery in this cohort. We show that in patients with BR-PDAC, NCR results in superior R0 resection rates with an associated increase in patient survival. Our results show that survival advantage is greatest in BR-PDAC patients who received neo-adjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Our findings affirm the advantage of NCR prior to surgery, particularly FOLFIRINOX based treatment, in this cohort of patients.

Denonvilliers’ fascia acts as the fulcrum and hammock for continence after radical prostatectomy

Background Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. Immediate urinary incontinence post-RP was still common and depressing without specific reason. Methods A multicenter cohort of 154 consecutive patients from 2018 to 2020, who was diagnosed with localized prostate cancer underwent either modified mini-incision retropubic radical prostatectomy (Mmi-RRP) or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) or robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Seventy-two patients with Denonvilliers’ fascia (DF) spared were included in DFS (Denonvilliers’ fascia sparing) group. Whereas eighty-two patients with DF completely or partially dissected were set as Group Control. The primary outcome was immediate continence (ImC). Continuous data and categorical data were analyzed with t-test and Chi-square test, respectively. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with logistic regression. Results Urinary continence of Group DFS was significantly better than that of Group Control at each time point within one year after operation. Incidence rate of continence in Group DFS and Group Control were 83.3% vs 13.4% (P < 0.01) for ImC, 90.3% vs 30.5% (P < 0.01) at 3 months, 91.7% vs 64.6% (P < 0.01) at 6 months, and 93.1% vs 80.5% (P = 0.02) at 1 year after operation, respectively. Positive surgical margin (PSM) showed no significant difference (20.8% vs 20.7%, P = 1.0). In multivariate analysis, DFS showed importance for ImC post RP (OR = 26.4, P < 0.01). Conclusions Denonvilliers’ fascia acted as the fulcrum and hammock for continence post RP. Preservation of DF contributed to better continence after RP without increase of PSM. Trail registration Our research was conducted retrospectively and approved by the ethical committees of Minhang Hospital, but not registered.

Oncological Outcomes of Transoral Laryngeal Microsurgery with Fiber-Optic Diode Laser for Early Glottic Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

<b><i>Backgroud/Objectives:</i></b> Transoral laser laryngeal microsurgery (_LTLM) has been widely used in the treatment of early-stage glottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) for the past few decades. Although T stage, tumor grade, anterior commissure involvement, type of cordectomy, positive surgical margin, and postoperative additional therapies were accused as the prognostic factors for recurrence, there is still controversy about these data in the literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the oncological results of our patients with early glottic LSCC treated with _LTLM as a single-modality therapy in a single-center study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients with early-stage (T_is-1–2/N₀) glottic LSCC who underwent _LTLM as a primary treatment from 2011 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological factors and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> One hundred and sixty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The 5-year overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS), disease-free (DFS), and laryngectomy-free survival rates were 84.5%, 97.9%, 79.2%, and 93.5%, respectively. The most common stage, histopathological type, and type of endoscopic cordectomy were T₁ stage, well-differentiated cancer, and type 2 cordectomy, respectively. A positive surgical margin was defined in 20 (12.4%) patients. There was a significant relationship between histopathological grade and positive surgical margins (<i>p</i> = 0.038). OS and DSS rates of “wait and see” modality were lower, while DFS of radiotherapy was lower than that of other treatment modalities in patients with positive surgical margins, but the differences were not statistically significant. Nineteen (11.8%) patients had a recurrence. DSS was statistically significantly lower in patients with recurrence (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The results of our study showed that anterior commissure involvement, surgical margin positivity, and higher T stage statistically did not reduce survival rates in early-stage LSCC patients treated with _LTLM. As the histopathological grade of the tumor worsens, the risk of surgical margin positivity increases. RT may have a negative effect on recurrence and organ preservation in the additional treatment of patient with positive surgical margins.

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Patients with Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumour

Introduction. Few studies have described the characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST). In this study, we retrospectively investigated the clinicopathological features, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of these patients. Patients and Methods. We recruited patients with MPNST who were treated at our institutions from 1991 to 2020. We collected and statistically analysed information on patient-, tumour-, and treatment-related factors. The median follow-up period was 61 months (range, 1–335.8 months). Results. A total of 60 patients (31 males, 29 females) with a median age of 55 years (range, 8–84 years) at initial diagnosis were included. The median tumour size was 7 cm (range, 1.6–30 cm) in the greatest dimension. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of all patients was 69.5%. Univariate analysis revealed that large-sized tumour, metastasis at diagnosis, and no surgery of the primary tumour were significantly associated with patients with worse OS. Multivariate analysis identified surgery of the primary tumour as an independent prognostic factor for improved OS. Among patients with localised disease at diagnosis who underwent surgery of the primary tumour at our institutions, the 5-year OS, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates were 81.1%, 78.2%, and 70.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that positive surgical margin was significantly correlated with unfavourable OS and LRFS, and high grade was a poor prognostic indicator for MFS. Conclusion. Complete surgical resection with negative surgical margins is necessary for a successful MPNST treatment. Multidisciplinary management of MPNST with aggressive features is important for optimising patient outcomes.

Minimal Access (Endoscopic and Robotic) Breast Surgery in the Surgical Treatment of Early Breast Cancer—Trend and Clinical Outcome From a Single-Surgeon Experience Over 10 Years

ObjectiveEndoscopic assisted breast surgery (EABS) or robotic assisted breast surgery (RABS) performed through minimal axillary and/or peri-areolar incisions has become the representative of minimal access breast surgery (MABS). We report the trend and clinical outcome of MABS for treatment of breast cancer.MethodsInformation on patients who underwent breast cancer operation by the principal investigator during the period of 2011 to 2020 was collected from a single institute for analysis. The clinical outcome, trend, and cost of MABS were analyzed and compared with conventional breast surgery (CBS).ResultsA total of 824 breast cancer patients operated by a single surgeon were enrolled in this study: 254 received CBS and 570 received MABS, namely, 476 EABS and 94 RABS. From 2011 to 2020, the number of MABS performed annually has shown an increasing trend. Compared with CBS, MABS such as breast conserving surgery and nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) have effectively reduced wound scar length. Since the sequential uprise from conventional NSM (C-NSM), dual-axillary-areolar-incision two dimensional (2D) endoscopic assisted NSM (E-NSM), single-axillary-incision E-NSM, robotic assisted NSM (R-NSM), and single-port 3D E-NSM, the development of minimal access mastectomies increasingly paralleled with NSM. The operation time of various MABS decreased significantly and showed no statistical difference compared with CBS. R-NSM was associated with highest cost, followed by 3D E-NSM, E-NSM, and C-NSM. The positive surgical margin rate and local recurrence rate of MABS and CBS were not statistically different.ConclusionMABS showed comparable clinical outcome and preliminary oncologic safety as CBS and has been increasingly performed as the surgical treatment of breast cancer, especially minimal access NSM.

What Are The Determinants of Parametrial Invasion In Patients With Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Cross Sectional Study

Background: There was an increase in number of patients presented with early-stage cervical cancer (CC). Tumors with favorable pathological features might be candidates for less radical surgery.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 700 patients with histologically confirmed CC between January 2011 and March 2020. Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to assess relations between parametrial involvement (PI) and clinic-pathological variables.Results: Total number of 132 patients with stage IA to IIA were eligible to participate. Squamous cell carcinoma was reported in 100 (75.8%) patients, adenocarcinoma and other tumor pathologies were found in 24(18.2%) and 8(6.1%), respectively. Considering the FIGO stage, 11 (8.4%) patients had IA, 111 (83%%) IB and 10 (7.6%) IIA. Nine patients (6.8%) had PI on permanent pathologic report. Univariate analysis demonstrated that following variables were statistically different between patients with and without PI: age ≥ 50, tumor size ≥ 3cm, lower segment involvement, poorly differentiated pathology, deep stromal invasion, pelvic lymph node, lympho-vascular involvement and positive surgical margin (all p values < 0.05). Among these variables only tumor size ≥ 3 cm (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.11-4.16, p value: 0.02), deep stromal invasion (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.9-7.43, p value: 0.02) and positive surgical margin (OR: 5.1, 95% CI: 3.97-11.15, p value: 0.008) were independent risk factor of PI in multivariate analysis.Conclusions: Early stage CC can be surgically approached in a more conservative manner if patients have tumor size < 3 cm and do not have deep stromal invasion in conization.