Optimisation of iron removal units to include arsenic removal

2005 ◽  
pp. 279-288
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
pp. 263-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Mosb√¶k ◽  
A Sharma ◽  
J Tjell
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Moed ◽  
D. van Halem ◽  
J. Q. J. C. Verberk ◽  
G. L. Amy ◽  
J. C. van Dijk

Subsurface arsenic and iron removal (SAR/SIR) is a novel technology to remove arsenic, iron and other groundwater components by using the subsoil. This research project investigated the influence of the groundwater composition on subsurface treatment. In anoxic sand column experiments, with synthetic groundwater and virgin sand, it was found that several dissolved substances in groundwater compete for adsorption sites with arsenic and iron. The presence of 0.01 mmol L−1 phosphate, 0.2 mmol L−1 silicate, and 1 mmol L−1 nitrate greatly reduced the efficiency of SAR, illustrating the vulnerability of this technology in diverse geochemical settings. SIR was not as sensitive to other inorganic groundwater compounds, though iron retardation was limited by 1.2 mmol L−1 calcium and 0.06 mmol L−1 manganese.


2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. D. Lehimas ◽  
J. I. Chapman ◽  
F. P. Bourgine
Keyword(s):  

Desalination ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 265 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Shafiquzzaman ◽  
Md. Shafiul Azam ◽  
Jun Nakajima ◽  
Quazi Hamidul Bari

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 400-409
Author(s):  
Ingrid M. Sorensen ◽  
Edward A. McBean ◽  
Mujibur Rahman

As a result of naturally occurring arsenic in groundwater, it is estimated that 42–60 million people in Bangladesh are exposed to arsenic at concentrations greater than the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline of 10 μg/L. Arsenic-Iron Removal Plants (AIRPs) are capable of removing 50–90% of arsenic from groundwater, but are frequently unable to meet the WHO guideline. The effectiveness of three design modifications intended to improve the performance of AIRPs is described: (1) the addition of scrap or locally available iron to the filtration media, (2) raising the intake pipe that connects the two tanks of the AIRP, and (3) introducing baffles to the aeration tank. Total arsenic, iron, phosphate, and dissolved oxygen were measured to determine the impact of each modification. The addition of iron media showed an increase in arsenic removal up to 13%, while raising the pipe intake accounted for a 3% increase in arsenic removal. The installation of both modifications to the same AIRP is expected to reduce the lifetime body burden from drinking water by one-half. The addition of baffles to the aeration tank showed no evidence of improving the arsenic removal capabilities of the AIRP.


2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (9) ◽  
pp. 139-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Holm ◽  
Walton R. Kelly ◽  
Steven D. Wilson ◽  
Jonathan L. Talbott
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 895-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ionel Balcu ◽  
Adina Segneanu ◽  
Marius Mirica ◽  
Mirela Iorga ◽  
Catalin Badea ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document