August Weismann: The Theory of the Germ Plasm and the [Non]– Inheritance of Acquired Characters

Author(s):  
David Wool ◽  
Naomi Paz ◽  
Leonid Friedman

Two distinct sets of phenomena can be distinguished, each of which gives the appearance of the inheritance of acquired characters. Somatic induction (Detto; = "Somatische Reizleitung” of Plate) corresponds to Lamarckian inheritance in its strictest sense, where the soma acquires a certain character in response to a certain stimulus, and then influences the germ plasm in such a way as to cause it to produce offspring exhibiting the same character even in the absence of the special stimulus that was needed to produce it in the ancestor. Parallel induction (Detto; = “Simultanreize” of Plate) is applied to cases in which the same external stimulus affects both germ plasm and somatoplasm in the same way, simultaneously but independently. Whereas probably most zoologists think that the existence of somatic induction has not been demonstrated, many well-established cases of parallel induction have been described. Probably all cases of persistence of the effects of a previous environment on offspring bred in a different environment also come under this heading. In the following pages I have described some experiments on parallel induction carried on on a large scale and with measurable characters, lending themselves therefore to biometrical treatment. Special attention has been paid to the all important subject of controls, as will be described in the proper place. The organism I have employed is Simocephalus vetulus , a common Daphnid which adapts itself easily to breeding in captivity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Jablonka ◽  
Ehud Lamm

<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Abstract </strong></span>| Lamarck has left many legacies for future generations of biologists<span class="s2"><strong>. </strong></span>His best known legacy was an explicit suggestion, developed in the <em>Philosophie zoologique </em>(PZ), that the effects of use and disuse (acquired characters) can be inherited and can drive species transformation.This suggestion was formulated as two laws, which we refer to as the law of biological plasticity and the law of phenotypic continuity<span class="s2"><strong>. </strong></span>We put these laws in their historical context and distinguish between Lamarck’s key insights and later neo-Lamarckian interpretations of his ideas<span class="s2"><strong>.</strong></span>We argue that Lamarck’s emphasis on the role played by the organization of living beings and his physiological model of reproduction are directly relevant to 21st-century concerns, and illustrate this by discussing intergenerational genomic continuity and cultural evolution.</p>


Nature ◽  
1933 ◽  
Vol 131 (3299) ◽  
pp. 95-95
Author(s):  
R. L. JENKINS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document