Analysis of Ignitable Liquid Residues

Keyword(s):  
Separations ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Nizio ◽  
Shari Forbes

In cases of suspected arson, a body may be intentionally burnt to cause loss of life, dispose of remains, or conceal identification. A primary focus of a fire investigation, particularly involving human remains, is to establish the cause of the fire; this often includes the forensic analysis of fire debris for the detection of ignitable liquid residues (ILRs). Commercial containers for the collection of fire debris evidence include metal cans, glass jars, and polymer/nylon bags of limited size. This presents a complication in cases where the fire debris consists of an intact, or partially intact, human cadaver. This study proposed the use of a body bag as an alternative sampling container. A method was developed and tested for the collection and analysis of ILRs from burnt porcine remains contained within a body bag using dynamic headspace sampling (using an Easy-VOC™ hand-held manually operated grab-sampler and stainless steel sorbent tubes containing Tenax TA) followed by thermal desorption comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TD-GC×GC-TOFMS). The results demonstrated that a body bag containing remains burnt with gasoline tested positive for the presence of gasoline, while blank body bag controls and a body bag containing remains burnt without gasoline tested negative. The proposed method permits the collection of headspace samples from burnt remains before the remains are removed from the crime scene, limiting the potential for contamination and the loss of volatiles during transit and storage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 46-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina Guerrera ◽  
Erika Chen ◽  
Robert Powers ◽  
Brooke W. Kammrath
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
pp. 91-118
Author(s):  
Sachil Kumar ◽  
Anu Singla ◽  
Ruddhida R. Vidwans

A fire investigation is a difficult and challenging task. An investigator's basic task at a fire scene is two-fold: first, to ascertain the origin of the fire and, second, to closely investigate the site of origin and try to determine what triggered a fire to start at or near that spot. Usually, an investigation would begin by attempting to obtain a general view of the site and the fire damage; this may be achieved at ground level or from an elevated location. Following this, one may examine the materials available, the fuel load, and the condition of the debris at different locations. Surprisingly, the science of fire investigation is not stagnant, and each year, more information to assist investigators in determining the location and cause of a fire by diligent observation of the scene and laboratory study of fire debris is released. This chapter is split into two sections. The first section discusses the general procedures to be used during a fire investigation, and the second section discusses laboratory analysis of ignitable liquid residue analysis.


Separations ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa Allen ◽  
Mary Williams ◽  
Nicholas Thurn ◽  
Michael Sigman

Computational models for determining the strength of fire debris evidence based on likelihood ratios (LR) were developed and validated against data sets derived from different distributions of ASTM E1618-14 designated ignitable liquid class and substrate pyrolysis contributions using in-silico generated data. The models all perform well in cross validation against the distributions used to generate the model. However, a model generated based on data that does not contain representatives from all of the ASTM E1618-14 classes does not perform well in validation with data sets that contain representatives from the missing classes. A quadratic discriminant model based on a balanced data set (ignitable liquid versus substrate pyrolysis), with a uniform distribution of the ASTM E1618-14 classes, performed well (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.836) when tested against laboratory-developed casework-relevant samples of known ground truth.


2008 ◽  
pp. 377-439
Author(s):  
Eric Stauffer ◽  
Julia A. Dolan ◽  
Reta Newman
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 252 ◽  
pp. 177-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lopatka ◽  
Michael E. Sigman ◽  
Marjan J. Sjerps ◽  
Mary R. Williams ◽  
Gabriel Vivó-Truyols

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document