Boundary-Layer Approximations for Laminar Flow

2013 ◽  
pp. 79-90
Keyword(s):  
1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford J. Obara ◽  
C. P. van Dam

In this paper, foil and planform parameters which govern the level of viscous drag produced by the keel of a sailing yacht are discussed. It is shown that the application of laminar boundary-Layer flow offers great potential for increased boat speed resulting from the reduction in viscous drag. Three foil shapes have been designed and it is shown that their hydro­dynamic characteristics are very much dependent on location and mode of boundary-Layer transition. The planform parameter which strongly affects the capabilities of the keel to achieve laminar flow is lea ding-edge sweep angle. The two significant phenomena related to keel sweep angle which can cause premature transition of the laminar boundary layer are crossflow instability and turbulent contamination of the leading-edge attachment line. These flow phenomena and methods to control them are discussed in detail. The remaining factors that affect the maintainability of laminar flow include surface roughness, surface waviness, and freestream turbulence. Recommended limits for these factors are given to insure achievability of laminar flow on the keel. In addition, the application of a simple trailing-edge flap to improve the hydrodynamic characteristics of a foil at moderate-to-high leeway angles is studied.


Author(s):  
Yongjian Zhong ◽  
Songyang Li

With the rapid development of high bypass ratio turbofan engine, the proportion of the nacelle drag increases obviously in the total drag of the aircraft with the increase of nacelle surface area. And the frictional resistance is one of the major contributors of drag. Under the same Reynolds number, the friction resistance in turbulent boundary layer is about 10 times larger as that in laminar boundary layer. Therefore, a correctly profiled engine nacelle will delay the transition in the boundary layer and allow laminar flow to extend back, resulting in a substantial drag reduction. In the previous conference paper (9th reference), a 2D nacelle longitudinal profile-line geometry generator, which allows curvature and slope-of-curvature to be continuous was developed and presented. This established an optimization system to minimize nacelle frictional drag. One of the nacelle profile-line is optimized to achieve minimum drag coefficient, and then is stacked with the other original profile-lines to form the 3D isolated nacelle aerodynamic shape. Finally, a total 23% of nacelle outer surface maintains a laminar flow and its frictional drag coefficient is less than initial shape. This paper proposes a new 2D nacelle longitudinal profile-line design method, based on PARSEC parameterization, with can generate the profile-line rapidly and precisely. Conservation Full Potential Equation was used to calculate the aerodynamic distribution and obtain the transition location. Then adaptive simulated annealing genetic algorithm was adapted to search 2D profiles of low drag, which would be applied to narrow down design space in 3D nacelle optimization. Second, 2D profiles were stacked circumferentially, by NURBS surface generator, to form the 3D nacelle aerodynamic shape, and an optimization system was established, in combination with the 3D nacelle generator, γ–Reθ transition model, Kriging surrogate model and adaptive simulated annealing algorithm, for natural laminar flow nacelle design. Finally, a total 34% of nacelle surface maintains a laminar flow and its frictional drag coefficient is less than initial shape. The generated optimized loft was evaluated by CFD to determine if the low drag of this optimized nacelle shape can be maintained under different Mach numbers and angles of attack.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matej Sabo ◽  
◽  
Martin Bugaj

Higher awareness of aviation sustainability and environmental impact creates more research on profile drag reduction. The basic principles of aerodynamic profile drag are described and its role within the total drag. The boundary layer is defined using mathematical and physical principles of fluid dynamics. There are two types of movement inside the boundary layer: laminar and turbulent. In these, their impact on profile drag is analysed. The profile drag of a wing has two sources: form drag and friction drag. Applications with the most impact, throughout history, on both types of drag reductions were reviewed. Because most of the total drag comes from friction, researchers focus more on it compared to form drag. The significant way of reducing friction drag is postponing the transition of laminar flow into turbulent. The control of laminar flow became crucial for reducing friction drag. In the last two decades, European Union supported multiple projects concerning laminar flow control. These advancements in the field are starting to get implemented and tested on new aircraft by manufactures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen J. Groot ◽  
Ethan S. Beyak ◽  
Daniel Heston ◽  
Helen L. Reed

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document