scholarly journals Investing and Stopping

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 898-909
Author(s):  
Moritz Duembgen ◽  
L. C. G. Rogers

In this paper we solve the hedge fund manager's optimization problem in a model that allows for investors to enter and leave the fund over time depending on its performance. The manager's payoff at the end of the year will then depend not just on the terminal value of the fund level, but also on the lowest and the highest value reached over that time. We establish equivalence to an optimal stopping problem for Brownian motion; by approximating this problem with the corresponding optimal stopping problem for a random walk we are led to a simple and efficient numerical scheme to find the solution, which we then illustrate with some examples.

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (04) ◽  
pp. 898-909
Author(s):  
Moritz Duembgen ◽  
L. C. G. Rogers

In this paper we solve the hedge fund manager's optimization problem in a model that allows for investors to enter and leave the fund over time depending on its performance. The manager's payoff at the end of the year will then depend not just on the terminal value of the fund level, but also on the lowest and the highest value reached over that time. We establish equivalence to an optimal stopping problem for Brownian motion; by approximating this problem with the corresponding optimal stopping problem for a random walk we are led to a simple and efficient numerical scheme to find the solution, which we then illustrate with some examples.


2000 ◽  
Vol 37 (04) ◽  
pp. 1143-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Lamberton ◽  
L. C. G. Rogers

We use embedding techniques to analyse the error of approximation of an optimal stopping problem along Brownian paths when Brownian motion is approximated by a random walk.


2000 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 1143-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Lamberton ◽  
L. C. G. Rogers

We use embedding techniques to analyse the error of approximation of an optimal stopping problem along Brownian paths when Brownian motion is approximated by a random walk.


1983 ◽  
Vol 15 (02) ◽  
pp. 225-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Karatzas

We consider the problem of tracking a Brownian motion by a process of bounded variation, in such a way as to minimize total expected cost of both ‘action' and ‘deviation from a target state 0'. The former is proportional to the amount of control exerted to date, while the latter is being measured by a function which can be viewed, for simplicity, as quadratic. We discuss the discounted, stationary and finite-horizon variants of the problem. The answer to all three questions takes the form of exerting control in asingularmanner, in order not to exit from a certain region. Explicit solutions are found for the first and second questions, while the third is reduced to an appropriate optimal stopping problem. This reduction yields properties, as well as global upper and lower bounds, for the associated moving boundary. The pertinent Abelian and ergodic relationships for the corresponding value functions are also derived.


2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (03) ◽  
pp. 826-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Guo ◽  
J. Liu

Consider a geometric Brownian motion X t (ω) with drift. Suppose that there is an independent source that sends signals at random times τ 1 < τ 2 < ⋯. Upon receiving each signal, a decision has to be made as to whether to stop or to continue. Stopping at time τ will bring a reward S τ , where S t = max(max0≤u≤t X u , s) for some constant s ≥ X 0. The objective is to choose an optimal stopping time to maximize the discounted expected reward E[e−r τ i S τ i | X 0 = x, S 0 = s], where r is a discount factor. This problem can be viewed as a randomized version of the Bermudan look-back option pricing problem. In this paper, we derive explicit solutions to this optimal stopping problem, assuming that signal arrival is a Poisson process with parameter λ. Optimal stopping rules are differentiated by the frequency of the signal process. Specifically, there exists a threshold λ* such that if λ>λ*, the optimal stopping problem is solved via the standard formulation of a ‘free boundary’ problem and the optimal stopping time τ * is governed by a threshold a * such that τ * = inf{τ n : X τ n ≤a * S τ n }. If λ≤λ* then it is optimal to stop immediately a signal is received, i.e. at τ * = τ 1. Mathematically, it is intriguing that a smooth fit is critical in the former case while irrelevant in the latter.


2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 826-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Guo ◽  
J. Liu

Consider a geometric Brownian motion Xt(ω) with drift. Suppose that there is an independent source that sends signals at random times τ1 < τ2 < ⋯. Upon receiving each signal, a decision has to be made as to whether to stop or to continue. Stopping at time τ will bring a reward Sτ, where St = max(max0≤u≤tXu, s) for some constant s ≥ X0. The objective is to choose an optimal stopping time to maximize the discounted expected reward E[e−rτiSτi | X0 = x, S0 = s], where r is a discount factor. This problem can be viewed as a randomized version of the Bermudan look-back option pricing problem. In this paper, we derive explicit solutions to this optimal stopping problem, assuming that signal arrival is a Poisson process with parameter λ. Optimal stopping rules are differentiated by the frequency of the signal process. Specifically, there exists a threshold λ* such that if λ>λ*, the optimal stopping problem is solved via the standard formulation of a ‘free boundary’ problem and the optimal stopping time τ* is governed by a threshold a* such that τ* = inf{τn: Xτn≤a*Sτn}. If λ≤λ* then it is optimal to stop immediately a signal is received, i.e. at τ* = τ1. Mathematically, it is intriguing that a smooth fit is critical in the former case while irrelevant in the latter.


1983 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Karatzas

We consider the problem of tracking a Brownian motion by a process of bounded variation, in such a way as to minimize total expected cost of both ‘action' and ‘deviation from a target state 0'. The former is proportional to the amount of control exerted to date, while the latter is being measured by a function which can be viewed, for simplicity, as quadratic. We discuss the discounted, stationary and finite-horizon variants of the problem. The answer to all three questions takes the form of exerting control in a singular manner, in order not to exit from a certain region. Explicit solutions are found for the first and second questions, while the third is reduced to an appropriate optimal stopping problem. This reduction yields properties, as well as global upper and lower bounds, for the associated moving boundary. The pertinent Abelian and ergodic relationships for the corresponding value functions are also derived.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document