scholarly journals The Olfactory Memory of the Honeybee Apis Mellifera: I. Odorant Modulation of Short- and Intermediate-Term Memory After Single-Trial Conditioning

1991 ◽  
Vol 161 (1) ◽  
pp. 367-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRIAN H. SMITH

In the first 15 min after a single learning trial the olfactory memory of the honeybee, Apis mellifera, proceeds through different processing phases during which time the memory is differentially sensitive to a cooling treatment that causes amnesia. During learning about floral odours in a natural situation, several decisions would normally be made about floral choice within that period. In order to study these phenomena in more detail, single-trial proboscis extension conditioning to different odorants was used. Several stimulus-specific effects on memory consolidation in the honeybee are shown. From previous experiments it was predicted that certain odorants would be more salient conditioning stimuli. This result is confirmed. Second, generalization from the conditioned odorant to a different odorant depends on the conditioned odorant and the time postconditioning. In some combinations, responses to a novel odorant are significantly stronger than responses to the conditioning odorant after memory consolidation. These data indicate that memory recall in the honeybee, as it is evidenced by proboscis extension, is sensitive to several aspects of stimulus identity and presentation. The acquisition and recall processes are therefore much more dynamic processes than realized previously.

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 762-779
Author(s):  
Susannah Hannaford ◽  
Amelia Sattler ◽  
Jessica Siegel ◽  
Robin L. Foster

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meenakshi Vijaykumar ◽  
Sandhya Mogily ◽  
Aparna Dutta-Gupta ◽  
Joby Joseph

AbstractCapacity and condition under which lateral transfer of olfactory memory is possible in insects are still debated. Here we present evidence consistent with lack of ability to transfer olfactory associative memory in two species of honeybees, Apis mellifera and Apis dorsata in a PER associative conditioning paradigm where the untrained antenna is blocked by an insulating coat. We show that the olfactory system on each side of the bee can learn and retrieve independently and the retrieval using the antenna on the side contralateral to the trained one is not affected by the training. Recreating the paradigm in which the memory on the contralateral side has been reported at three hours after training we see that the memory is available on the contralateral side immediately after training and moreover, training with trained side antenna coated with insulator does not prevent learning, pointing to a possible insufficiency of block of odor stimuli in this paradigm. Bee does not learn the odor stimuli applied to one side alone as a stimulus different from odor presented to both sides. Moreover the behaviour of the bee as a whole can be predicted if the sides are assumed to learn and store independently and the organism as a whole is able to retrieve the memory if either of the sides have learned.Summary StatementThe two halves of honeybee brain store and retrieve olfactory associative memories independently.


Neuroscience ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 422 ◽  
pp. 75-87
Author(s):  
Alexander V. Kedrov ◽  
Olga A. Mineyeva ◽  
Grigori N. Enikolopov ◽  
Konstantin V. Anokhin

Insects ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 884
Author(s):  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Shuang Shan ◽  
Shaohua Gu ◽  
Xinzheng Huang ◽  
Zibo Li ◽  
...  

Bee responses to floral scent are usually influenced by both innate biases and prior experience. Honeybees are less attracted than bumblebees to tomato flowers. However, little is known about how tomato floral scent regulates the foraging behaviors of honeybees and bumblebees. In this study, the foraging behaviors of the honeybee Apis mellifera and the bumblebee Bombus lantschouensis on tomato flowers in greenhouses were investigated. Whether the two bee species exhibit different responses to tomato floral scent and how innate biases and prior experience influence bee choice behavior were examined. In the greenhouses, honeybees failed to collect pollen from tomato flowers, and their foraging activities decreased significantly over days. Additionally, neither naïve honeybees nor naïve bumblebees showed a preference for tomato floral scent in a Y-tube olfactometer. However, foraging experience in the tomato greenhouses helped bumblebees develop a strong preference for the scent, whereas honeybees with foraging experience continued to show aversion to tomato floral scent. After learning to associate tomato floral scent with a sugar reward in proboscis extension response (PER) assays, both bee species exhibited a preference for tomato floral scent in Y-tube olfactometers. The findings indicated that prior experience with a food reward strongly influenced bee preference for tomato floral scent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document