scholarly journals ASO Visual Abstract: Comparison of Outcomes for Classic-Type Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Managed with Surgical Excision After Core Biopsy Versus Observation

Author(s):  
Regina Matar ◽  
Varadan Sevilimedu ◽  
Anna Park ◽  
Tari A. King ◽  
Melissa Pilewskie
2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 574-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Chester ◽  
O Bokinni ◽  
I Ahmed ◽  
A Kasem

Introduction There is no national standard treatment for patients with breast lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Association of Breast Surgery guidelines for the management of breast cancer suggest that lesions containing LCIS should be excised for definitive diagnosis and recommend close surveillance after excision biopsy. The aim of this study was to form a picture of the current management of LCIS by UK breast surgeons. Methods A questionnaire about the management of LCIS was sent to 490 UK breast surgeons. Results Of 490 questionnaires sent out, 173 (35%) were returned. When LCIS is present in a core biopsy, 61% of breast surgeons perform surgical excision, 22% would not excise but would continue follow-up and the remainder perform neither or set no clear management plan. Over half (54%) follow patients up with five years of annual mammography. If classic LCIS were found at the margins of wide local excision, 92% would not re-excise. Conversely, if pleomorphic LCIS were found, 71% would achieve clear margins. Respondents were split evenly regarding management of classic LCIS with a family history as 54% would not alter management whereas 43% would treat the disease more aggressively. Conclusions Our survey has shown that in cases where LCIS is found at core biopsy, most surgeons follow Association of Breast Surgery guidance, obtaining further histological samples to exclude pleomorphic LCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive cancer, whereas others opt for annual surveillance and some discharge the patient. This study highlighted the huge variability in LCIS management, and the need for randomised controlled trials and input into national audits such as the Sloane Project to establish evidence-based national standard guidelines.


Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1073-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa P. Murray ◽  
Chad Luedtke ◽  
Laura Liberman ◽  
Tatjana Nehhozina ◽  
Muzaffar Akram ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 138 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A082-A082
Author(s):  
Kristen Arnold ◽  
Christine Schammel ◽  
Laura Thompson ◽  
Brian McKinley ◽  
David Schammel

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eka Rozentsvayg ◽  
Kristen Carver ◽  
Sunita Borkar ◽  
Melvy Mathew ◽  
Sean Enis ◽  
...  

Our goal was to assess the value of surgical excision of benign papillomas of the breast diagnosed on percutaneous core biopsy by determining the frequency of upgrade to malignancies and high risk lesions on a final surgical pathology. We reviewed 67 patients who had biopsies yielding benign papilloma and underwent subsequent surgical excision. Surgical pathology of the excised lesions was compared with initial core biopsy pathology results. 54 patients had concordant benign core and excisional pathology. Cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma) was diagnosed in five (7%) patients. Surgery revealed high-risk lesions in 8 (12%) patients, including atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, and lobular carcinoma in situ. Cancer and high risk lesions accounted for 13 (19%) upstaging events from benign papilloma diagnosis. Our data suggests that surgical excision is warranted with core pathology of benign papilloma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document