Muscle Metaboreflex Control of Sympathetic Activity Is Preserved following Acute Intermittent Hypercapnic Hypoxia

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke M. Shafer ◽  
Anthony V. Incognito ◽  
Tyler D. Vermeulen ◽  
Massimo Nardone ◽  
André L. Teixeira ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 1424-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
LINDA M. UENO-PARDI ◽  
RENAN S. GUERRA ◽  
THIAGO T. GOYA ◽  
ROSYVALDO F. SILVA ◽  
ELISANGELA M. GARA ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 1748-1754 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. O'Leary

Ischemia in active skeletal muscle induces reflex increases in systemic arterial pressure (SAP) and heart rate (HR), termed the muscle metaboreflex. When metaboreflex activation is maintained during postexercise muscle ischemia, SAP remains elevated; however, HR decreases. Why the HR responses differ with metaboreflex activation during exercise vs. during postexercise ischemia while the SAP responses are similar in each setting remains unclear. Two hypotheses were tested: 1) the increase in HR with muscle ischemia occurs predominantly via an increase in sympathetic activity, and 2) sympathetic activity to the heart remains elevated during post-exercise ischemia; however, HR decreases because of an increase in parasympathetic outflow. The muscle metaboreflex was activated in conscious dogs during treadmill exercise (3.2 kph, 0% grade) by progressively decreasing perfusion to the hindlimbs. Experiments were performed before and after muscarinic (atropine) or beta- (atenolol or propranolol) receptor blockade. In control experiments, once beyond the threshold for the reflex, the HR sensitivity of the muscle metaboreflex averaged -2.4 +/- 0.3 beats.min-1.mmHg-1 and the reflex open-loop gain averaged -3.2 +/- 0.3 (calculated as the ratio of the increase in HR or SAP to the decrease in hindlimb perfusion pressure beyond threshold). Atropine had no effect on either HR sensitivity (-2.7 +/- 0.4 beats.min-1.mmHg-1) or open-loop gain (-3.3 +/- 0.5, both P > 0.05 vs. control). However, pretreatment with beta-receptor antagonist significantly decreased both HR sensitivity (-0.7 +/- 0.1 beats.min-1.mmHg-1, P < 0.001) and open-loop gain (-1.9 +/- 0.3, P < 0.01). During postexercise ischemia, HR decreased while SAP remained elevated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 951-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
M RONDON ◽  
M LATERZA ◽  
L DEMATOS ◽  
I TROMBETTA ◽  
A BRAGA ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 190-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donal S. O'Leary ◽  
Javier A. Sala-Mercado ◽  
Robert L. Hammond ◽  
Eric J. Ansorge ◽  
Jong-Kyung Kim ◽  
...  

Ischemia of active skeletal muscle evokes a powerful blood pressure-raising reflex termed the muscle metaboreflex (MMR). MMR activation increases cardiac sympathetic nerve activity, which increases heart rate, ventricular contractility, and cardiac output (CO). However, despite the marked increase in ventricular work, no coronary vasodilation occurs. Using conscious, chronically instrumented dogs, we observed MMR-induced changes in arterial pressure, CO, left circumflex coronary blood flow (CBF), and coronary vascular conductance (CVC) before and after α1-receptor blockade (prazosin, 100 μg/kg iv). MMR was activated during mild treadmill exercise by partially reducing hindlimb blood flow. In control experiments, MMR activation caused a substantial pressor response-mediated via increases in CO. Although CBF increased (+28.1 ± 3.7 ml/min; P < 0.05), CVC did not change (0.45 ± 0.05 vs. 0.47 ± 0.06 ml·min−1·mmHg−1, exercise vs. exercise with MMR activation, respectively; P > 0.05). Thus all of the increase in CBF was due to the increase in arterial pressure. In contrast, after prazosin, MMR activation caused a greater increase in CBF (+55.9 ± 17.1 ml/min; P < 0.05 vs. control) and CVC rose significantly (0.59 ± 0.08 vs. 0.81 ± 0.17 ml·min−1·mmHg−1, exercise vs. exercise with MMR activation, respectively; P < 0.05). A greater increase in CO also occurred (+2.01 ± 0.1 vs. +3.27 ± 1.1 l/min, control vs. prazosin, respectively; P < 0.05). We conclude that the MMR-induced increases in sympathetic activity to the heart functionally restrain coronary vasodilation, which may limit increases in ventricular function.


1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 2101-2106 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. K. Somers ◽  
A. L. Mark ◽  
D. C. Zavala ◽  
F. M. Abboud

We compared the effects of isocapnic hypoxia (IHO) and hyperoxic hypercapnia (HC) on sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) recorded from a peroneal nerve in 13 normal subjects. HC caused greater increases in blood pressure (BP), minute ventilation (VE), and SNA [53 +/- 14% (SE) during HC vs. 21 +/- 7% during IHO; P less than 0.05]. Even at equivalent levels of VE, HC still elicited greater SNA than IHO. However, apnea during HC caused a lesser (P less than 0.05) increase in SNA (91 +/- 26% compared with apnea on room air) than apnea during IHO (173 +/- 50%). Hypercapnic hypoxia resulted in a greater absolute increase in VE (23.6 +/- 2.8 l/min) than the additive increases due to HC alone plus IHO alone (18.0 +/- 1.8 l/min, P less than 0.05). SNA also increased synergistically by 108 +/- 23% with the combined stimulus compared with the additive effect of HC alone plus IHO alone (68 +/- 19%; P less than 0.05). We conclude that 1) HC causes greater increases in VE and SNA than does hypoxia; 2) for the same increase in VE, hypercapnia still causes a greater increase in SNA than hypoxia; however, during apnea, hypoxia causes a much greater increase in SNA than hypercapnia; 3) the inhibitory influence of ventilation on SNA is greater during hypoxia (i.e., predominantly peripheral chemoreceptor stimulation) than hypercapnia (i.e., predominantly central chemoreceptor stimulation); and 4) combined hypoxia and hypercapnia have a synergistic effect on SNA as well as on VE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document