Application of Deep Neural Network to Study the Sleep Stage Scoring on the Polysomnography

Biophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
抒伟 王
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 581-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqing Zhang ◽  
Mingkai Xu ◽  
Yanru Li ◽  
Minmin Su ◽  
Ziyao Xu ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Neergaard Olesen ◽  
Poul Jørgen Jennum ◽  
Emmanuel Mignot ◽  
Helge Bjarup Dissing Sorensen

Abstract Study Objectives Sleep stage scoring is performed manually by sleep experts and is prone to subjective interpretation of scoring rules with low intra- and interscorer reliability. Many automatic systems rely on few small-scale databases for developing models, and generalizability to new datasets is thus unknown. We investigated a novel deep neural network to assess the generalizability of several large-scale cohorts. Methods A deep neural network model was developed using 15,684 polysomnography studies from five different cohorts. We applied four different scenarios: (1) impact of varying timescales in the model; (2) performance of a single cohort on other cohorts of smaller, greater, or equal size relative to the performance of other cohorts on a single cohort; (3) varying the fraction of mixed-cohort training data compared with using single-origin data; and (4) comparing models trained on combinations of data from 2, 3, and 4 cohorts. Results Overall classification accuracy improved with increasing fractions of training data (0.25%: 0.782 ± 0.097, 95% CI [0.777–0.787]; 100%: 0.869 ± 0.064, 95% CI [0.864–0.872]), and with increasing number of data sources (2: 0.788 ± 0.102, 95% CI [0.787–0.790]; 3: 0.808 ± 0.092, 95% CI [0.807–0.810]; 4: 0.821 ± 0.085, 95% CI [0.819–0.823]). Different cohorts show varying levels of generalization to other cohorts. Conclusions Automatic sleep stage scoring systems based on deep learning algorithms should consider as much data as possible from as many sources available to ensure proper generalization. Public datasets for benchmarking should be made available for future research.


SLEEP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Zhang ◽  
Daniel Fabbri ◽  
Raghu Upender ◽  
David Kent

Abstract Study Objectives Polysomnography (PSG) scoring is labor intensive and suffers from variability in inter- and intra-rater reliability. Automated PSG scoring has the potential to reduce the human labor costs and the variability inherent to this task. Deep learning is a form of machine learning that uses neural networks to recognize data patterns by inspecting many examples rather than by following explicit programming. Methods A sleep staging classifier trained using deep learning methods scored PSG data from the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS). The training set was composed of 42 560 hours of PSG data from 5213 patients. To capture higher-order data, spectrograms were generated from electroencephalography, electrooculography, and electromyography data and then passed to the neural network. A holdout set of 580 PSGs not included in the training set was used to assess model accuracy and discrimination via weighted F1-score, per-stage accuracy, and Cohen’s kappa (K). Results The optimal neural network model was composed of spectrograms in the input layer feeding into convolutional neural network layers and a long short-term memory layer to achieve a weighted F1-score of 0.87 and K = 0.82. Conclusions The deep learning sleep stage classifier demonstrates excellent accuracy and agreement with expert sleep stage scoring, outperforming human agreement on sleep staging. It achieves comparable or better F1-scores, accuracy, and Cohen’s kappa compared to literature for automated sleep stage scoring of PSG epochs. Accurate automated scoring of other PSG events may eventually allow for fully automated PSG scoring.


SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A169-A169
Author(s):  
C Kuo ◽  
G Chen

Abstract Introduction Manual sleep stage scoring is time consuming and subjective. Therefore, several studies focused on developing automated sleep scoring algorithms. The previously reported the automatic sleep scoring have been develop usually using small dataset, which less than 100 subjects. In this study, an automatic sleep scoring system based on ensemble convolutional neural network (ensemble-CNN) and spectrogram of sleep physiological signal was proposed and evaluated using a large dataset with sleep disorder. Methods The spectrograms were computed from each 30-s EEG and EOG of 994 subjects from PhysioNet 2018 challenge dataset, using the continuous wavelet transform, which were fed into an ensemble-CNN classification for training. The ensemble-CNN contained five pretrained models, ResNet-101, Inception-v4, DenseNet-201, Xception, and NASNet models, because these models’ architectures are different which can learn different features from the spectrograms to obtain high accuracy. The probabilities of five models were averaged to decide the sleep stage for each spectrogram. After classifying sleep stage, a smoothing process was used for sleep continuity. Moreover, the total 80% data from PhysioNet dataset were randomly assigned to the training set, and the remaining data were assigned to the testing set. Results To validate the robustness of the proposed system, the validation procedure was repeated five times. The performance measures were averaged over the five runs. The overall agreement and kappa coefficient of the proposed method are 82% and 0.73, respectively. The sensitivity of the sleep stages of Wake, N1, N2, N3, and REM are 90.0%, 48.6%, 84.9%, 84.2%, and 81.9%, respectively. Conclusion The performance of the proposed method was achieved expert level, and it was noted that the ensemble-CNN is a promising solution for automatic sleep stage scoring. This method can assist clinical staff in reducing the time required for sleep stage scoring in the future. Support This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan. (MOST 106-2218-E-035-013-MY2, 108-2221-E-035-064, and 108-2634-F-006-012).


SLEEP ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Schaltenbrand ◽  
R. Lengelle ◽  
M. Toussaint ◽  
R. Luthringer ◽  
G. Carelli ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Sors ◽  
Stéphane Bonnet ◽  
Sébastien Mirek ◽  
Laurent Vercueil ◽  
Jean-François Payen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document