Comparative Study of Outcomes between Operative and Non-Operative Treatment of Unstable Distal Radius Fracture in the Elderly Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Min Kim ◽  
Hyun Je Seo ◽  
Young Dae Jeon ◽  
Hyung Min Lee ◽  
Jung Hwan Son
2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 352
Author(s):  
Dong Chul Kim ◽  
Suc Hyun Kweon ◽  
Dae Moo Shim ◽  
Churl Hong Chun ◽  
Ha Heon Song ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 487-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Park ◽  
J. P. Kim ◽  
H. I. Lee ◽  
T. K. Lim ◽  
H. S. Jung ◽  
...  

We conducted a prospective randomized, multicentre study to compare short arm and long arm plaster casts for the treatment of stable distal radius fracture in patients older than 55 years. We randomly assigned patients over the age of 55 years who had stable distal radius fracture to either a short arm or long arm plaster cast at the first review 1 week after their injury. Radiographic and clinical follow-up was conducted at 1, 3, 5, 12 and 24 weeks following their injury. Also, degree of disability caused by each cast immobilization was evaluated at the patient’s visit to remove the cast. There were no significant differences in radiological parameters between the groups except for volar tilt. Despite these differences in volar tilt, neither functional status as measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, nor visual analogue scale was significantly different between the groups. However, the mean score of disability caused by plaster cast immobilization and the incidence rate of shoulder pain were significantly higher in patients who had a long plaster cast. Our findings suggest that a short arm cast is as effective as a long arm cast for stable distal radius fractures in the elderly. Furthermore, it is more comfortable and introduces less restriction on daily activities. Level of evidence: II


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 307-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Ho Shin ◽  
Hyun Sik Gong

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common upper extremity fracture in the elderly. Patients with a DRF have a two to fourfold higher risk of a subsequent fracture than those with no history of fractures, and DRFs occur on average 15 years earlier than hip fractures. Therefore, patients with a DRF offer physicians an important opportunity to diagnose and treat osteoporosis to prevent a secondary fracture. In this review, we provide recent update in the diagnosis and treatment of bone frailty in patients with a DRF.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 631-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lei ◽  
L-M. Hua ◽  
D-W. Wang

Probiotic treatment has been shown to improve bone formation, increase bone mass density and prevent bone loss. We aimed to assess the effect of probiotic treatment on functional recovery in elderly patients with a distal radius fracture. A total of 417 elderly patients with an acute distal radius fracture were enrolled in this double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. They were randomised to receive skimmed milk containing either a commercial probiotic (Lactobacillus casei Shirota) or placebo daily for a period of 6 months after the fracture. Treatment outcomes were the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) score, pain, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) score, active range of motion and grip strength, all of which were measured on a monthly basis. Throughout the duration of the study, DASH score, pain, CRPS score, wrist flexion and grip strength of patients receiving probiotics exhibited a significantly faster pace of improvement than those on placebo, with treatment outcomes of patients receiving Lactobacillus casei Shirota at month 4 at comparable levels with those of patients receiving placebo at month 6. In elderly patients with a fracture of the distal radius, administration of the probiotic could greatly accelerating the healing process.


1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Myung Chul Yoo ◽  
Yong Girl Rhee ◽  
Keun Young Lee ◽  
Dong Kee Ahn

2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 220-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Whiting ◽  
Christopher Rice ◽  
Frank Avilucea ◽  
Catherine Bulka ◽  
Michelle Shen ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates following inpatient versus outpatient distal radius fracture ORIF and identify specific complications that occur at increased rates among inpatients. Methods Using the 2005–2013 ACS-NSQIP, we collected patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, and 30-day postoperative complications following isolated ORIF of distal radius fractures. A propensity score matched design using an 8-to-1 “greedy” matching algorithm in a 1:4 ratio of inpatients to outpatients was utilized. Rates of minor, major, and total complications were compared. A multinomial logistic regression model was then used to assess the odds of complications following inpatient surgery. Results Total 4,016 patients were identified, 776 (19.3%) of whom underwent inpatient surgery and 3,240 (80.3%) underwent outpatient surgery. The propensity score matching algorithm yielded a cohort of 629 inpatients who were matched with 2,516 outpatients (1:4 ratio). After propensity score matching, inpatient treatment was associated with increased rates of major and total complications but not with minor complications. There was an increased odds of major complications and total complications following inpatient surgery compared with outpatient surgery. There was no difference in odds of minor complications between groups. Conclusion Inpatient operative treatment of distal radius fractures is associated with significantly increased rates of major and total complications compared with operative treatment as an outpatient. Odds of a major complication are six times higher and odds of total complications are two and a half times higher following inpatient distal radius ORIF compared with outpatient. Quality improvement measures should be specifically targeted to patients undergoing distal radius fracture ORIF in the inpatient setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document