scholarly journals Local Model Checking Algorithm Based on Mu-calculus with Partial Orders

Author(s):  
Hua Jiang ◽  
Qianli Li ◽  
Rongde Lin
1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (39) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Cheng

<p>It has been observed that the behavioural view of concurrent<br />systems that all possible sequences of actions are relevant is too generous;<br />not all sequences should be considered as likely behaviours. Taking<br />progress fairness assumptions into account one obtains a more realistic<br />behavioural view of the systems. In this paper we consider the problem<br />of performing model checking relative to this behavioural view. We<br />present a CTL-like logic which is interpreted over the model of concurrent<br />systems labelled 1-safe nets. It turns out that Mazurkiewicz trace<br />theory provides a natural setting in which the progress fairness assumptions<br />can be formalized. We provide the first, to our knowledge, set of<br />sound and complete tableau rules for a CTL-like logic interpreted under<br />progress fairness assumptions.</p><p><br />keywords: fair progress, labelled 1-safe nets, local model checking, maximal traces, partial orders, inevitability</p>


1992 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Bradfield ◽  
Colin Stirling

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (40) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Reif Andersen ◽  
Colin Stirling ◽  
Glynn Winskel

We present a proof system for determining satisfaction between<br />processes in a fairly general process algebra and assertions of the modal mu-calculus. The proof system is compositional in the structure of processes. It extends earlier work on compositional reasoning within the modal mu-calculus and combines it with techniques from work on local model checking. The proof system is sound for all processes and complete for a class of finite-state processes.


Author(s):  
Jonas Finnemann Jensen ◽  
Kim Guldstrand Larsen ◽  
Jiří Srba ◽  
Lars Kaerlund Oestergaard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document