Quantitative Geologic Description of Natural Fracture Systems (FOOTNOTE ^dagger): ABSTRACT

AAPG Bulletin ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Howard, R. C. Nolen-Hoeksema
Author(s):  
Hannes Hofmann ◽  
Tayfun Babadagli ◽  
Günter Zimmermann

The creation of large complex fracture networks by hydraulic fracturing is imperative for enhanced oil recovery from tight sand or shale reservoirs, tight gas extraction, and Hot-Dry-Rock (HDR) geothermal systems to improve the contact area to the rock matrix. Although conventional fracturing treatments may result in bi-wing fractures, there is evidence by microseismic mapping that fracture networks can develop in many unconventional reservoirs, especially when natural fracture systems are present and the differences between the principle stresses are low. However, not much insight is gained about fracture development as well as fluid and proppant transport in naturally fractured tight formations. In order to clarify the relationship between rock and treatment parameters, and resulting fracture properties, numerical simulations were performed using a commercial Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) simulator. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis is presented to identify typical fracture network patterns resulting from massive water fracturing treatments in different geological conditions. It is shown how the treatment parameters influence the fracture development and what type of fracture patterns may result from different treatment designs. The focus of this study is on complex fracture network development in different natural fracture systems. Additionally, the applicability of the DFN simulator for modeling shale gas stimulation and HDR stimulation is critically discussed. The approach stated above gives an insight into the relationships between rock properties (specifically matrix properties and characteristics of natural fracture systems) and the properties of developed fracture networks. Various simulated scenarios show typical conditions under which different complex fracture patterns can develop and prescribe efficient treatment designs to generate these fracture systems. Hydraulic stimulation is essential for the production of oil, gas, or heat from ultratight formations like shales and basement rocks (mainly granite). If natural fracture systems are present, the fracturing process becomes more complex to simulate. Our simulation results reveal valuable information about main parameters influencing fracture network properties, major factors leading to complex fracture network development, and differences between HDR and shale gas/oil shale stimulations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Junjie Yangfi

In the past decades, the success of unconventional hydrocarbon resource development can be attributed primarily to the improved understanding of fracture systems, including both hydraulically induced fractures and natural fracture networks. To tackle the fracture characterization problem, several recent papers have provided novel insights into fracture modeling technique. Because of the complex nature and heterogeneity of rock discontinuity, fabric, and texture, the fracture-modeling process typically suffers from limited data availability. Research shows that modeling results reached without interrogation of high-resolution petrophysical and geomechanical data can mislead because the fluid flow is actually controlled by fine-scale rock properties. A more-reliable fracture geometry can be obtained from an enhanced modeling process that preserves the signature from high-frequency data. Advanced techniques to model fracturing processes with proppant transportation and thermodynamics require even more-sophisticated simulation and computation power. When the subsurface is too puzzling to be described by a physical model and existing data, machine learning and artificial intelligence can be adapted as a practical alternative to interpret complex fracture systems. Taking a discrete fracture network (DFN) as an example, a data-driven approach has been introduced to learn from outcrop, borehole imaging, core computed tomography scan, and seismic data to recognize stratigraphic bedding, faults, subseismic fractures, and hydraulic fractures. Input data can be collected by hand, 3D stereophotogrammetry, or drone. When upscaling DFN into a coarse grid for reservoir simulation, deep-learning techniques such as convolutional neuron networks can be used to populate fracture properties into a dual-porosity/dual-permeability model approved to yield high accuracy compared with a fine-grid model. Furthermore, the new techniques greatly extend the application of fracture modeling in the arena of the energy transition, such as in geothermal optimization. Recommended additional reading at OnePetro: www.onepetro.org. SPE 203927 - Numerical Simulation of Proppant Transport in Hydraulically Fractured Reservoirs by Seyhan Emre Gorucu, Computer Modelling Group, et al. SPE 202679 - Deep-Learning Approach To Predict Rheological Behavior of Supercritical CO2 Foam Fracturing Fluid Under Different Operating Conditions by Shehzad Ahmed, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, et al. SPE 203983 - A 3D Coupled Thermal/Hydraulic/Mechanical Model Using EDFM and XFEM for Hydraulic-Fracture-Dominated Geothermal Reservoirs by Xiangyu Yu, Colorado School of Mines, et al.


2005 ◽  
Vol 148 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 116-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Leckenby ◽  
David J. Sanderson ◽  
Lidia Lonergan

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannes Hofmann ◽  
Tayfun Babadagli ◽  
Günter Zimmermann

The creation of large complex fracture networks by hydraulic fracturing is imperative for enhanced oil recovery from tight sand or shale reservoirs, tight gas extraction, and hot-dry-rock (HDR) geothermal systems to improve the contact area to the rock matrix. Although conventional fracturing treatments may result in biwing fractures, there is evidence by microseismic mapping that fracture networks can develop in many unconventional reservoirs, especially when natural fracture systems are present and the differences between the principle stresses are low. However, not much insight is gained about fracture development as well as fluid and proppant transport in naturally fractured tight formations. In order to clarify the relationship between rock and treatment parameters, and resulting fracture properties, numerical simulations were performed using a commercial discrete fracture network (DFN) simulator. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis is presented to identify typical fracture network patterns resulting from massive water fracturing treatments in different geological conditions. It is shown how the treatment parameters influence the fracture development and what type of fracture patterns may result from different treatment designs. The focus of this study is on complex fracture network development in different natural fracture systems. Additionally, the applicability of the DFN simulator for modeling shale gas stimulation and HDR stimulation is critically discussed. The approach stated above gives an insight into the relationships between rock properties (specifically matrix properties and characteristics of natural fracture systems) and the properties of developed fracture networks. Various simulated scenarios show typical conditions under which different complex fracture patterns can develop and prescribe efficient treatment designs to generate these fracture systems. Hydraulic stimulation is essential for the production of oil, gas, or heat from ultratight formations like shales and basement rocks (mainly granite). If natural fracture systems are present, the fracturing process becomes more complex to simulate. Our simulations suggest that stress state, in situ fracture networks, and fluid type are the main parameters influencing hydraulic fracture network development. Major factors leading to more complex fracture networks are an extensive pre-existing natural fracture network, small fracture spacings, low differences between the principle stresses, well contained formations, high tensile strength, high Young’s modulus, low viscosity fracturing fluid, and large fluid volumes. The differences between 5 km deep granitic HDR and 2.5 km deep shale gas stimulations are the following: (1) the reservoir temperature in granites is higher, (2) the pressures and stresses in granites are higher, (3) surface treatment pressures in granites are higher, (4) the fluid leak-off in granites is less, and (5) the mechanical parameters tensile strength and Young’s modulus of granites are usually higher than those of shales.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document