Tectonics and Structure of the Western Canada Foreland Basin

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R. Fermor ◽  
Ian W. Moffat
Keyword(s):  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Western Canada

The Western Canada Foreland Basin: a basin-centred gas system

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1099-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Boettcher ◽  
M. Thomas ◽  
M. G. Hrudey ◽  
D. J. Lewis ◽  
C. O'Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Western Canada ◽  
Gas System

Petroleum Systems in the Foreland Basin of Western Canada

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Creaney ◽  
J. Allan
Keyword(s):  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Western Canada ◽  
Petroleum Systems

Western Canada Foreland Basin Oil and Gas Plays

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Barclay ◽  
David G. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Western Canada

Chapter 3: Scaphitid Ammonites from the Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian-Santonian) Western Canada Foreland Basin

2017 ◽  
Vol 414 ◽  
pp. 105-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil H. Landman ◽  
A. Guy Plint ◽  
Ireneusz Walaszczyk
Keyword(s):  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Western Canada

scholarly journals Tectonic, eustatic and climatic controls on marginal‐marine sedimentation across a flexural depocentre: Paddy Member of Peace River Formation (Late Albian), Western Canada Foreland Basin

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Guy Plint ◽  
Jessica R. Krawetz ◽  
Robin A. Buckley ◽  
Kathleen M. Vannelli ◽  
Ireneusz Walaszczyk
Keyword(s):  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Western Canada ◽  
Peace River ◽  
Marine Sedimentation

High-precision U–Pb zircon ID–TIMS dating of two regionally extensive bentonites: Cenomanian Stage, Western Canada Foreland BasinThis article is one of a series of papers published in this Special Issue on the theme of Geochronology in honour of Tom Krogh.

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan R. Barker ◽  
Desmond E. Moser ◽  
Sandra L. Kamo ◽  
A. Guy Plint
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Proximal Part ◽  
Ionization Mass ◽  
Western Canada ◽  
Borehole Data ◽  
Three Dimensional Mapping ◽  
The Many ◽  
Dimensional Mapping ◽  
Regressive Events

The stratigraphy of Cretaceous rocks in the Western Canada Foreland Basin is well constrained by dense borehole data that allow three-dimensional mapping of transgressive–regressive events, paleogeography, and subsidence patterns. However, it is difficult to estimate rates of change or to place events in a precise temporal framework because very few of the many bentonite beds have been dated using modern techniques. In this study, two bentonites, of at least regional extent, were dated using isotope dilution – thermal ionization mass spectrometry (ID–TIMS) U–Pb methods on chemically abraded zircon crystals. The older bentonite correlates with the “X” bentonite of the late middle Cenomanian and yields an age of 95.87 ± 0.10 Ma. The Bighorn River Bentonite, which lies just below the Cenomanian–Turonian boundary, yields an age of 94.29 ± 0.13 Ma and is interpreted to equate with the “B” bentonite and bed 80 at Pueblo, Colorado. Both bentonites dated here are older than the previously reported 40Ar/39Ar ages from correlative United States samples, supporting the observation that 40Ar/39Ar ages may systematically underestimate ages of Cretaceous bentonites by ∼1%, as suggested by other recent studies. The X bentonite immediately precedes a major late middle Cenomanian eustatic transgression that inundated the Dunvegan delta complex. The new ages for the X and Bighorn River bentonites indicate an average minimum subsidence rate of ∼0.27 mm/year in the most proximal part of the Cenomanian foredeep in northeast British Columbia during this time. The new age of the Bighorn River Bentonite, coupled with the orbitally tuned time scale of Sageman et al. (2006) , suggests a Cenomanian–Turonian boundary age of 94.12 ± 0.13 Ma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document