3D imaging: the role of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: special reference to current guidelines

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy Makdissi
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Special Reference ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
3D Imaging ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Dental Practice ◽  
New Challenges ◽  
Current Guidelines

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a relatively new modality providing 3D imaging that has become more accessible than ever to dental practice. This brings in new challenges that need to be addressed. This article discusses the role of CBCT in dentistry and highlights the availability of current guidelines.

scholarly journals The Role of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Diagnostics of Cystic Masses of the Jaw

2017 ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
M. A. Batova
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Incisive Canal ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Cystic Masses ◽  
Cbct Analysis ◽  
Tomography Analysis

Research objective. The study aimed to evaluate cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) capabilities in diagnostics of cystic masses of the jaw.Methods. Over a period of 2015–2016 32 patients age 6 to 67 underwent both panoramic tomography and CBCT (using panoramic tomographic scanner STRATO 2000 and cone-beam computed tomographic scanner i-Cat respectively). 47% (n = 15) of the participants were women, 53% (n = 17) – men. Radiation exposure for a single procedure amounts to 0,05 mSv for panoramic tomography, 0,07 mSv for CBCT (FOV =13 cm), 0,06 mSv for CBCT (FOV =8 cm).Results. Comparative analysis of obtained results demonstrates that CBCT showed 54% (n = 27) more cystic masses of the jaws than panoramic radiography could. CBCT additionally showed the following pathologies: granulomas smaller than4 mm diameter – 85% (n = 23), 83% (n = 23) of said granulomas were found on maxilla, radicular cysts of maxilla – 11% (n = 3), incisive canal cyst – 4% (n = 1). Additionally panoramic tomography analysis misdiagnosed 5 granulomas (80% (n = 4) on mandibular premolar and molar areas) that were not found during CBCT analysis.Conclusion. The low effective dose and high informativity of CBCT enables the method to be used instead of intraoral radiography, panoramic tomography and MSCT as a screening procedure in diagnostics of dento-facial system pathologies, including cystic masses of the jaw. 

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in General Dental Practice

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Nicholas Drage
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Plain Film ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Dental Practice ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
General Dental Practice ◽  
Plain Film Radiography

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) can be a useful adjunct to conventional plain film radiography, but its use must be carefully justified as the radiation dose is generally higher. Factors affecting the dose include the field of view (FOV) size, the exposure factors, the angle of rotation and voxel size. Once justified, the exposure should be fully optimised to ensure the dose to the patient is kept as low as possible while ensuring there is no reduction in the diagnostic yield. The European Commission (EC) and the Faculty of General Dental Practice (FGDP)(UK) have published selection criteria on the use of CBCT in dentistry. This article provides an overview of CBCT and summarises the latest guidance on selection criteria relevant to the general dental practitioner.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document