Air Disaster, and: Glances

2021 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-71
Author(s):  
James Hannaham
Keyword(s):  
Air Disaster

Longitudinal Study for Survivors of the Garuda Indonesia Air Disaster in Japan

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Misari Oe ◽  
Mari Takamatsu ◽  
Takayuki Maruoka ◽  
Masaharu Maeda
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Air Disaster

Identification in the Manchester air disaster'

BDJ ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 166 (3) ◽  
pp. 69-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
F D Ayton ◽  
H N Parfitt
Keyword(s):  
Air Disaster

‘When that great ship went down’: Modern maritime disasters and collective memory

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 734-751
Author(s):  
Robert C. Moyer
Keyword(s):  
Collective Memory ◽  
Psychological Impact ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Qualitative Comparison ◽  
Indirect Measurements ◽  
Internet Media ◽  
The Social ◽  
Air Disaster

The aim of this article is to examine the social and psychological impact of modern maritime disasters upon the population of a technologically developed nation. Through an innovative research approach using various indirect measurements of public interest including the internet, media response, music and film, the article explores the interest displayed by the American public following the loss of ships such as the Titanic, Andrea Doria, Edmund Fitzgerald, and Andrea Gail. In order to provide a basis for qualitative comparison, disasters involving other modes of transportation are also considered, including the Hindenburg crash, the ‘Great Train Wreck of 1918’ in Nashville, TN, the Tenerife air disaster of 1977, and the Concorde crash of 2000. The article seeks to explain why the American public seems to display more short-term and long-term interest in maritime disasters than in disasters involving other forms of transportation.

Safety in the Air: Air Carriers' Rights and Responsibilities at National and International Law

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-303
Author(s):  
Ruwantissa Abeyratne
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Weapons Of Mass Destruction ◽  
Mass Destruction ◽  
Passenger Screening ◽  
Air Transport Industry ◽  
Potential Offender ◽  
Air Disaster ◽  
Machine Readable ◽  
Air Carriers ◽  
Legal Consequences

Several air disasters involving loss of lives of passengers and others on the ground have illustrated the key role expected of airlines in ensuring the security of aircraft and the safety of those affected by the contract of carriage by air. The culmination of these expectations came immediately after 11 September 2001 when aircraft were used as weapons of mass destruction against passengers of the aircraft concerned and those on the ground. Sustained debate followed between the air transport industry and regulators as to whether airlines could justifiably be expected to bear full responsibility for the safety of those on board and on the ground who may be affected by an air disaster. The international community now recognizes that the airlines have to bear some responsibility in the decision-making process regarding persons boarding their aircraft. Modern techniques for passenger screening include the use of machine readable travel documents (MRTDs) and advance passenger information (API). In addition, the practice of passenger profiling is not uncommon among some carriers who cooperate with customs and immigration authorities to identify possible offenders, with a view to preventing them from boarding their aircraft. The process of refusal to board, however, may entail legal consequences, particularly in the context of the contract which has already passed between the air carrier and passenger prior to boarding. Although usually a contract can be frustrated thus affecting the performance of that contract, the instance of a potential offender is unique in that refusal of carriage is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence. This article examines this issue with a focus on developments in some European and United States jurisdictions.

Identifying Human Remains Following an Air Disaster

2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 85-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina E. Newhill ◽  
Edward W. Sites
Keyword(s):  
Human Remains ◽  
Air Disaster

Air Disaster in Antarctica

1985 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. 359-361
Author(s):  
Morgan Fahey
Keyword(s):  
Aviation Safety ◽  
The World ◽  
Air Disaster ◽  
Mount Erebus ◽  
Airline Company

On the 28th of November 1979, the fourth largest air disaster in the world occurred on the icy slopes of Mount Erebus, deep in Antarctica and 50 km from Scott Base. The 237 passengers and 20 crew were all killed instantly on impact, and their bodies and the wreckage were spread over an area 500 m long and 100 m wide. It had started out as a scenic flight, the 14th to Antarctica, and it had ended in tragedy. It was suffered, too, by an airline company which had maintained the highest standards of aviation safety.In an account of Scott's last Antartic expedition in 1910, Cherry Garrard wrote of the “worst journey in the world,” and he said, “I have seen Fuji, the most dainty and graceful of mountains—and also Kanchenjunga; only Mechelangelo among men could have conceived such grandeur.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document