scholarly journals “What gave rise to modern human behavior?”: Perspective from psychology

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (25) ◽  
pp. 2782-2785
Author(s):  
XueJun BAI ◽  
Hui LI
2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (24) ◽  
pp. 9964-9969 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bouzouggar ◽  
N. Barton ◽  
M. Vanhaeren ◽  
F. d'Errico ◽  
S. Collcutt ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrey P. Zabiyako ◽  

In the period of the 19th – beginning of the 21th century in the study of mythol­ogy three paradigms of the study of mythogenesis have consistently dominated – historical, non-historical and historical-cognitive. The historical-cognitive para­digm is based on the latest scientific results in the field of archeology, anthro­pology and cognitive science. The modern model of anthropogenesis assumes the existence of general regularities of development of three types of Homo – Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans. There are reasons that are not only Homo sapiens, but also the Neanderthals and Denisovans had high cognitive ca­pabilities and signs of modern human behavior. The most important foundations of mythogenesis are the functioning of language and the activity of the imagina­tion. All three populations of ancient mankind reached a cognitive minimum, which opened the way to mythogenesis. Signs of mythogenesis are clearly recorded no later than the time of the transition from the Middle to Upper Pale­olithic, during the Early Aurignacian, but the beginning of this process goes back to an earlier period.


Science ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 324 (5932) ◽  
pp. 1298-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Powell ◽  
S. Shennan ◽  
M. G. Thomas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document