Form factor and temporal coherence of laser radiation

2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (9) ◽  
pp. 541
Author(s):  
V. E. Privalov ◽  
S. A. Shoĭdin ◽  
A. V. Trifanov
2014 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 13002 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Fratini ◽  
L. Safari ◽  
A. G. Hayrapetyan ◽  
K. Jänkälä ◽  
P. Amaro ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-202
Author(s):  
V. E. Privalov ◽  
V. G. Shemanin ◽  
S. A. Shoydin

2014 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. 101102 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Hilbert ◽  
C. Rödel ◽  
G. Brenner ◽  
T. Döppner ◽  
S. Düsterer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
T. Geipel ◽  
W. Mader ◽  
P. Pirouz

Temperature affects both elastic and inelastic scattering of electrons in a crystal. The Debye-Waller factor, B, describes the influence of temperature on the elastic scattering of electrons, whereas the imaginary part of the (complex) atomic form factor, fc = fr + ifi, describes the influence of temperature on the inelastic scattering of electrons (i.e. absorption). In HRTEM simulations, two possible ways to include absorption are: (i) an approximate method in which absorption is described by a phenomenological constant, μ, i.e. fi; - μfr, with the real part of the atomic form factor, fr, obtained from Hartree-Fock calculations, (ii) a more accurate method in which the absorptive components, fi of the atomic form factor are explicitly calculated. In this contribution, the inclusion of both the Debye-Waller factor and absorption on HRTEM images of a (Oll)-oriented GaAs crystal are presented (using the EMS software.Fig. 1 shows the the amplitudes and phases of the dominant 111 beams as a function of the specimen thickness, t, for the cases when μ = 0 (i.e. no absorption, solid line) and μ = 0.1 (with absorption, dashed line).


Author(s):  
Max T. Otten ◽  
Wim M.J. Coene

High-resolution imaging with a LaB6 instrument is limited by the spatial and temporal coherence, with little contrast remaining beyond the point resolution. A Field Emission Gun (FEG) reduces the incidence angle by a factor 5 to 10 and the energy spread by 2 to 3. Since the incidence angle is the dominant limitation for LaB6 the FEG provides a major improvement in contrast transfer, reducing the information limit to roughly one half of the point resolution. The strong improvement, predicted from high-resolution theory, can be seen readily in diffractograms (Fig. 1) and high-resolution images (Fig. 2). Even if the information in the image is limited deliberately to the point resolution by using an objective aperture, the improved contrast transfer close to the point resolution (Fig. 1) is already worthwhile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document