scholarly journals Differentiation of Pancreatic Cancer and Chronic Pancreatitis Using Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Images: A Diagnostic Test

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. e63820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maoling Zhu ◽  
Can Xu ◽  
Jianguo Yu ◽  
Yijun Wu ◽  
Chunguang Li ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mevlut Kurt ◽  
Murat Ozkan ◽  
Murat Cakiroglu ◽  
Orhan Kocaman ◽  
Bulent Yilmaz ◽  
...  

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 141705-141718
Author(s):  
Min Li ◽  
Xiaohan Nie ◽  
Yilidan Reheman ◽  
Pan Huang ◽  
Shuailei Zhang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Hashimoto ◽  
Izumi Ohno ◽  
Hiroshi Imaoka ◽  
Hideaki Takahashi ◽  
Shuichi Mitsunaga ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 831-836.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianwei Zhu ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Yining Chu ◽  
Xiaojia Hou ◽  
Ling Xing ◽  
...  

1972 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. T. DE DOMBAL ◽  
J. C. HORROCKS ◽  
J. R. STANILAND ◽  
P. J. GUILLOU

This paper describes a series of 10,500 attempts at »pattern-recognition« by two groups of humans and a computer based system. There was little difference between the performances of 11 clinicians and 11 other persons of comparable intellectual capability. Both groups’ performances were related to the pattern-size, the accuracy diminishing rapidly as the patterns grew larger. By contrast the computer system increased its accuracy as the patterns increased in size.It is suggested (a) that clinicians are very little better than others at pattem-recognition, (b) that the clinician is incapable of analysing on a probabilistic basis the data he collects during a traditional clinical interview and examination and (c) that the study emphasises once again a major difference between human and computer performance. The implications as - regards human- and computer-aided diagnosis are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document