scholarly journals Effect of Paralysis at the Time of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion on Pharyngolaryngeal Morbidities. A Randomized Trial

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e0134130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyo-Seok Na ◽  
Young-Tae Jeon ◽  
Hyun-Jung Shin ◽  
Ah-Young Oh ◽  
Hee-Pyoung Park ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Brimacombe ◽  
Christian Keller ◽  
Dana Vosoba Judd

Background The authors compare three techniques for insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Methods Two hundred forty healthy patients aged 18-80 yr were randomly allocated for ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion using the digital, introducer tool (IT), or gum elastic bougie (GEB)-guided techniques. The digital and IT techniques were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The GEB-guided technique involved priming the drain tube with the GEB, placing the GEB in the esophagus under direct vision, and inserting the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway using the digital technique with the GEB as a guide. Failed insertion was defined by any of the following criteria: (1) failed pharyngeal placement; (2) malposition (air leaks, negative tap test results, or failed gastric tube insertion if pharyngeal placement was successful); and (3) ineffective ventilation (maximum expired tidal volume < 8 ml/kg or end-tidal carbon dioxide > 45 mmHg if correctly positioned). Any visible or occult blood was noted. Sore throat, dysphonia, and dysphagia were assessed 18-24 h postoperatively. Results Insertion was more frequently successful with the GEB-guided technique at the first attempt (GEB, 100%; digital, 88%; IT, 84%; both P < 0.001), but success after three attempts was similar (GEB, 100%; digital, 99%; IT, 98%). The time taken to successful placement was similar among groups at the first attempt but was shorter for the GEB-technique after three attempts (GEB, 25 +/- 14 s; digital, 33 +/- 19 s; IT, 37 +/- 25 s; both: P < 0.003). There were no differences in the frequency of visible blood, but occult blood occurred less frequently with the GEB-guided technique (GEB, 12%; digital, 29%; IT, 31%; both: P < 0.02) but was similar among techniques if insertion was successful at the first attempt. There were no differences in postoperative airway morbidity. CONCLUSION The GEB-guided insertion technique is more frequently successful than the digital or IT techniques. The authors suggest that the GEB-guided technique may be a useful backup technique for when the digital and IT techniques fail.


2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Taneja ◽  
M. Agarwal ◽  
J. S. Dali ◽  
G. Agrawal

The Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) is routinely inserted by the digital and introducer tool techniques but a newer Gum Elastic Bougie (GEB) guided insertion technique has been described. The aims and objectives were to compare the ease of PLMA insertion and fibreoptic view of PLMA after placement using GEB and conventional techniques. Ninety-six ASA I or II patients of either gender, aged 18 to 60 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia in the supine position were included in this study. Following induction of anaesthesia, a PLMA was inserted using a GEB, introducer tool or digital technique in Groups G, I and D respectively (n=32). Correct placement of the PLMA was confirmed by using clinical tests along with fibreoptic assessment. Ease of PLMA insertion was assessed by the number of attempts, time taken and number of patients requiring lateral approach for insertion. The fibreoptic view of PLMA placement through the airway tube was graded on a scale from 4 (best view) to 1 (worst view). GEB-guided PLMA insertion was more successful both after the first attempt (G 100%, I 69%, D 72%, P <0.01) and after two attempts (G 100%, I 78%, D 84%, P <0.05). Time taken for successful placement was significantly shorter in the GEB-guided group after two attempts (G 22∓2 seconds, I 31.9±18.8 seconds, D 29.5±18.6 seconds, P <0.05). The fibreoptic view through the airway tube was significantly better in the GEB-guided group (P <0.01). Incidence of trauma was significantly less in the GEB-guided group (P <0.05).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document