scholarly journals Experimental Muscle Pain Impairs the Synergistic Modular Control of Neck Muscles

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e0137844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Gizzi ◽  
Silvia Muceli ◽  
Frank Petzke ◽  
Deborah Falla
Author(s):  
Paul W Hodges ◽  
Jane Butler ◽  
Kylie Tucker ◽  
Christopher W. MacDonell ◽  
Peter Poortvliet ◽  
...  

Pain ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 140 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen ◽  
Kathleen A. Sluka ◽  
Hong Ling Nie

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 911-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rogério Pessoto Hirata ◽  
Ulysses Fernandes Ervilha ◽  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen ◽  
Thomas Graven-Nielsen

2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 743-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serajul I. Khan ◽  
Chris J. McNeil ◽  
Simon C. Gandevia ◽  
Janet L. Taylor

Muscle pain has widespread effects on motor performance, but the effect of pain on voluntary activation, which is the level of neural drive to contracting muscle, is not known. To determine whether induced muscle pain reduces voluntary activation during maximal voluntary contractions, voluntary activation of elbow flexors was assessed with both motor-point stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex. In addition, we performed a psychophysical experiment to investigate the effect of induced muscle pain across a wide range of submaximal efforts (5–75% maximum). In all studies, elbow flexion torque was recorded before, during, and after experimental muscle pain by injection of 1 ml of 5% hypertonic saline into biceps. Injection of hypertonic saline evoked deep pain in the muscle (pain rating ∼5 on a scale from 0 to 10). Experimental muscle pain caused a small (∼5%) but significant reduction of maximal voluntary torque in the motor-point and motor cortical studies ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.045, respectively; n = 7). By contrast, experimental muscle pain had no significant effect on voluntary activation when assessed with motor-point and motor cortical stimulation although voluntary activation tested with motor-point stimulation was reduced by ∼2% in contractions after pain had resolved ( P = 0.003). Furthermore, induced muscle pain had no significant effect on torque output during submaximal efforts ( P > 0.05; n = 6), which suggests that muscle pain did not alter the relationship between the sense of effort and production of voluntary torque. Hence, the present study suggests that transient experimental muscle pain in biceps brachii has a limited effect on central motor pathways.


2018 ◽  
Vol 236 (7) ◽  
pp. 1919-1925
Author(s):  
Sophie Kobuch ◽  
Luke A. Henderson ◽  
Vaughan G. Macefield ◽  
R. Brown

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1647-1657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Bouffard ◽  
Sauro E. Salomoni ◽  
Catherine Mercier ◽  
Kylie Tucker ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Roy ◽  
...  

As individuals with musculoskeletal disorders often experience motor impairments, contemporary rehabilitation relies heavily on the use of motor learning principles. However, motor impairments are often associated with pain. Although there is substantial evidence that muscle pain interferes with motor control, much less is known on its impact on motor learning. The objective of the present study was to assess the effects of muscle pain on locomotor learning. Two groups (Pain and Control) of healthy participants performed a locomotor adaptation task (robotized ankle-foot orthosis perturbing ankle movements during swing) on two consecutive days. On day 1 (acquisition), hypertonic saline was injected in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of the Pain group participants, while Control group participants were pain free. All participants were pain free on day 2 (retention). Changes in movement errors caused by the perturbation were assessed as an indicator of motor performance. Detailed analysis of kinematic and electromyographic data provided information about motor strategies. No between-group differences were observed on motor performance measured during the acquisition and retention phases. However, Pain group participants had a residual movement error later in the swing phase and smaller early TA activation than Control group participants, thereby suggesting a reduction in the use of anticipatory motor strategies to overcome the perturbation. Muscle pain did not interfere with global motor performance during locomotor adaptation. The different motor strategies used in the presence of muscle pain may reflect a diminished ability to anticipate the consequences of a perturbation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study shows that experimental muscle pain does not influence global motor performance during the acquisition or next-day retention phases of locomotor learning. This contrasts with previous results obtained with cutaneous pain, emphasizing the risk of directly extrapolating from one pain modality to another. Muscle pain affected motor strategies used when performing the task, however: it reduced the ability to use increased feedforward control to overcome the force field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document