scholarly journals Feedback from retinal ganglion cells to the inner retina

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254611
Author(s):  
Anastasiia Vlasiuk ◽  
Hiroki Asari
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junctions ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Inner Retina ◽  
Feature Selectivity ◽  
Chemical Synapses

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are thought to be strictly postsynaptic within the retina. They carry visual signals from the eye to the brain, but do not make chemical synapses onto other retinal neurons. Nevertheless, they form gap junctions with other RGCs and amacrine cells, providing possibilities for RGC signals to feed back into the inner retina. Here we identified such feedback circuitry in the salamander and mouse retinas. First, using biologically inspired circuit models, we found mutual inhibition among RGCs of the same type. We then experimentally determined that this effect is mediated by gap junctions with amacrine cells. Finally, we found that this negative feedback lowers RGC visual response gain without affecting feature selectivity. The principal neurons of the retina therefore participate in a recurrent circuit much as those in other brain areas, not being a mere collector of retinal signals, but are actively involved in visual computations.

scholarly journals Feedback from retinal ganglion cells to the inner retina

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasiia Vlasiuk ◽  
Hiroki Asari
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junctions ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Inner Retina ◽  
Feature Selectivity ◽  
Chemical Synapses

AbstractRetinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are thought to be strictly postsynaptic within the retina. They carry visual signals from the eye to the brain, but do not make chemical synapses onto other retinal neurons. Nevertheless, they form gap junctions with other RGCs and amacrine cells, providing possibilities for RGC signals to feed back into the inner retina. Here we identified such feedback circuitry in the salamander and mouse retinas. First, using biologically inspired circuit models, we found mutual inhibition among RGCs of the same type. We then experimentally determined that this effect is mediated by gap junctions with amacrine cells. Finally, we found that this negative feedback lowers RGC visual response gain without affecting feature selectivity. The principal neurons of the retina therefore participate in a recurrent circuit much as those in other brain areas, not being a mere collector of retinal signals, but are actively involved in visual computations.

Photovoltaic stimulation efficiently evokes network-mediated activity of retinal ganglion cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naïg A. L. Chenais ◽  
Marta J. I. Airaghi Leccardi ◽  
Diego Ghezzi
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Biophysical Model ◽  
High Frequency Stimulation ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Cell Coupling ◽  
Inner Retina ◽  
Stimulation Of

AbstractObjectivePhotovoltaic retinal prostheses theoretically offer the possibility of standalone high-resolution electrical stimulation of the retina. However, in artificial vision, achieving locally selective epiretinal stimulation is particularly challenging, on the grounds of axonal activation and electrical cell coupling.ApproachHere we show that electrical and photovoltaic stimulation of dystrophic retinal circuits with capacitive-like pulses leads to a greater efficiency for indirect network-mediated activation of retinal ganglion cells. In addition, a biophysical model of the inner retina stimulation is proposed to investigate the waveform and duration commitments in the genesis of indirect activity of retinal ganglion cells.Main resultsBoth in-vitro and in-silico approaches suggest that the application of long voltage pulses or gradual voltage changes are more effective to sustainably activate the inner excitatory and inhibitory layers of the retina, thus leading to a reproducible indirect response. The involvement of the inhibitory feedback from amacrine cells in the forming of indirect patterns represents a novel biological tool to locally cluster the response of the retinal ganglion cells.SignificanceThese results demonstrate that recruiting inner retina cells with epiretinal stimulation enables not only to bypass axonal stimulation but also to obtain a more focal activation thanks to the natural lateral inhibition. In this perspective, the use of capacitive-like waveforms generated by photovoltaic prostheses may allow improving the neural response resolution while standing high-frequency stimulation.

scholarly journals Expression of a Barhl1a reporter in subsets of retinal ganglion cells and commissural neurons of the developing zebrafish brain

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahad Albadri ◽  
Olivier Armant ◽  
Tairi Aljand-Geschwill ◽  
Filippo Del Bene ◽  
Matthias Carl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Optic Chiasm ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Commissural Neurons ◽  
Axonal Projections ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
And Function

AbstractPromoting the regeneration or survival of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is one focus of regenerative medicine. Homeobox Barhl transcription factors might be instrumental in these processes. In mammals, only barhl2 is expressed in the retina and is required for both subtype identity acquisition of amacrine cells and for the survival of RGCs downstream of Atoh7, a transcription factor necessary for RGC genesis. The underlying mechanisms of this dual role of Barhl2 in mammals have remained elusive. Whole genome duplication in the teleost lineage generated the barhl1a and barhl2 paralogues. In the Zebrafish retina, Barhl2 functions as determinant of subsets of amacrine cells lineally related to RGCs independently of Atoh7. In contrast, barhl1a expression depends on Atoh7 but its expression dynamics and function have not been studied. Here we describe for the first time a Barhl1a:GFP reporter line in vivo showing that Barhl1a turns on exclusively in subsets of RGCs and their post-mitotic precursors. We also show transient expression of Barhl1a:GFP in diencephalic neurons extending their axonal projections as part of the post-optic commissure, at the time of optic chiasm formation. This work sets the ground for future studies on RGC subtype identity, axonal projections and genetic specification of Barhl1a-positive RGCs and commissural neurons.

scholarly journals Gap Junctions Contribute to Differential Light Adaptation across Direction-Selective Retinal Ganglion Cells

Neuron ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 216-228.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyang Yao ◽  
Jon Cafaro ◽  
Amanda J. McLaughlin ◽  
Friso R. Postma ◽  
David L. Paul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junctions ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Light Adaptation ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Retinal Ganglion

Characterization of Spontaneous Inhibitory Synaptic Currents in Salamander Retinal Ganglion Cells

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 1752-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Gao ◽  
Samuel M. Wu
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Synaptic Vesicles ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Equilibrium Potential ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Light Onset ◽  
Synaptic Currents ◽  
Postsynaptic Currents

Gao, Fan and Samuel M. Wu. Characterization of spontaneous inhibitory synaptic currents in salamander retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1752–1764, 1998. Spontaneous and light-evoked postsynaptic currents (sPSCs and lePSCs, respectively) in retinal ganglion cells of the larval tiger salamander were recorded under voltage-clamp conditions from living retinal slices. The focus of this study is to characterize the spontaneous inhibitory PSCs (sIPSCs) and their contribution to the light-evoked inhibitory PSCs (leIPSCs) in on-off ganglion cells. sIPSCs were isolated from spontaneous excitatory PSCs (sEPSCs) by application of 10 μM 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX) + 50 μM 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5). In ∼70% of on-off ganglion cells, bicuculline (or picrotoxin) completely blocks sIPSCs, suggesting all sIPSCs in these cells are mediated by GABAergic synaptic vesicles and γ-aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) receptors (GABAergic sIPSCs, or GABAsIPSCs). In the remaining 30% of on-off ganglion cells, bicuculline (or picrotoxin) blocks 70–98% of the sIPSCs, and the remaining 2–30% are blocked by strychnine (glycinergic sIPSCs, or GLYsIPSCs). GABAsIPSCs occur randomly with an exponentially distributed interval probability density function, and they persist without noticeable rundown over time. The GABAsIPSC frequency is greatly reduced by cobalt, consistent with the idea that they are largely mediated by calcium-dependent vesicular release. GABAsIPSCs in DNQX + AP5 are tetrodotoxin (TTX) insensitive, suggesting that amacrine cells that release GABA under these conditions do not generate spontaneous action potentials. The average GABAsIPSCs exhibited linear current-voltage relation with a reversal potential near the chloride equilibrium potential, and an average peak conductance of 319.67 ± 252.83 (SD) pS. For GLYsIPSCs, the average peak conductance increase is 301.68 ± 94.34 pS. These parameters are of the same order of magnitude as those measured in inhibitory miniature postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) associated with single synaptic vesicles in the CNS. The amplitude histograms of GABAsIPSCs did not exhibit multiple peaks, suggesting that the larger events are not discrete multiples of elementary events (or quanta). We propose that each GABAsIPSC or GLYsIPSC in retinal ganglion cells is mediated by a single or synchronized multiple of synaptic vesicles with variable neurotransmitter contents. In a sample of 16 on-off ganglion cells, the average peak leIPSC (held at 0 mV) at the light onset is 509.0 ± 233.85 pA and that at the light offset is 529.0 ± 339.88 pA. The approximate number of GABAsIPSCs and GLYsIPSCs required to generate the average light responses, calculated by the ratio of the charge (area under current traces) of the leIPSCs to that of the average single sIPSCs, is 118 ± 52 for the light onset, and 132 ± 76 for the light offset.

scholarly journals Physiological characterization of a rare subpopulation of doublet-spiking neurons in the ferret lateral geniculate nucleus

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 432-442
Author(s):  
Allison J. Murphy ◽  
J. Michael Hasse ◽  
Farran Briggs
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Physiological Characterization ◽  
Visual Thalamus ◽  
Spike Shape

Interest in visual system homologies across species has recently increased. Across species, retinas contain diverse retinal ganglion cells including cells with unusual visual response properties. It is unclear whether rare retinal ganglion cells in carnivores project to and drive similarly unique visual responses in the visual thalamus. We discovered a rare subpopulation of thalamic neurons defined by unique spike shape and visual response properties, suggesting that nonstandard visual computations are common to many species.

A quantitative analysis of the effects of excitatory neurotoxins on retinal ganglion cells in the chick

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ngoh Ngoh Tung ◽  
Ian G. Morgan ◽  
David Ehrlich
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Small Cells ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Chick Retina ◽  
Area 5 ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Displaced Amacrine Cells ◽  
Series Of Experiments

AbstractThe present study examines the differential effects of three excitotoxins, kainic acid (KA), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), and α-amino-2,3-amino-2,3-dihydro-5- methyl-3-oxo-4- isoxazolepropanoic acid (AMPA) on neurons within the genglion cell layer (GCL) of the chick retina. Two-day-old chicks were given a single, 5 μl, intravitreal injection of KA, NMDA, or AMPA at a range of doses. Following treatment with 40 nmol KA, there was a 21% loss of neurons in the GCL. At 200 nmol KA, the loss increased to 46%. Exposure to KA eliminated mainly small neurons of soma area 5–15μm2, and medium-sized ganglion cells of soma area 15–25μm2. Large ganglion cells (>25μ,2) remained unaffected. The vast majority of small cells were probably displaced amarcrine cells. At a does of 3000 nmol NMDA, no further loss of cells was evident. Exposure to 200 nmol AMPA resulted in a 30% loss of large and some medium-sized ganglion cells. In a further series of experiments, exposure to excitotoxin was followed by a retinal scratch, which eliminated retinal ganglion cells within the axotomized region. The results indicate that only a small proportion of displaced amacrine cells are destroyed by NMDA and AMPA, whereas virtually all displaced amarine cells are sensitive to KA. The findings of this study indicate the existence of subclasses of ganglion cells with specificity towards different types of excitatory amino acids (EAA).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document