A quantitative analysis of the effects of excitatory neurotoxins on retinal ganglion cells in the chick

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ngoh Ngoh Tung ◽  
Ian G. Morgan ◽  
David Ehrlich
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Small Cells ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Chick Retina ◽  
Area 5 ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Displaced Amacrine Cells ◽  
Series Of Experiments

AbstractThe present study examines the differential effects of three excitotoxins, kainic acid (KA), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), and α-amino-2,3-amino-2,3-dihydro-5- methyl-3-oxo-4- isoxazolepropanoic acid (AMPA) on neurons within the genglion cell layer (GCL) of the chick retina. Two-day-old chicks were given a single, 5 μl, intravitreal injection of KA, NMDA, or AMPA at a range of doses. Following treatment with 40 nmol KA, there was a 21% loss of neurons in the GCL. At 200 nmol KA, the loss increased to 46%. Exposure to KA eliminated mainly small neurons of soma area 5–15μm2, and medium-sized ganglion cells of soma area 15–25μm2. Large ganglion cells (>25μ,2) remained unaffected. The vast majority of small cells were probably displaced amarcrine cells. At a does of 3000 nmol NMDA, no further loss of cells was evident. Exposure to 200 nmol AMPA resulted in a 30% loss of large and some medium-sized ganglion cells. In a further series of experiments, exposure to excitotoxin was followed by a retinal scratch, which eliminated retinal ganglion cells within the axotomized region. The results indicate that only a small proportion of displaced amacrine cells are destroyed by NMDA and AMPA, whereas virtually all displaced amarine cells are sensitive to KA. The findings of this study indicate the existence of subclasses of ganglion cells with specificity towards different types of excitatory amino acids (EAA).

scholarly journals Nel positively regulates the genesis of retinal ganglion cells by promoting their differentiation and survival during development

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chizu Nakamoto ◽  
Soh-Leh Kuan ◽  
Amy S. Findlay ◽  
Elaine Durward ◽  
Zhufeng Ouyang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Pigment Epithelium ◽  
Retinal Pigment ◽  
Neuronal Cell ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Displaced Amacrine Cells

For correct functioning of the nervous system, the appropriate number and complement of neuronal cell types must be produced during development. However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the production of individual classes of neurons are poorly understood. In this study, we investigate the function of the thrombospondin-1–like glycoprotein, Nel (neural epidermal growth factor [EGF]-like), in the generation of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in chicks. During eye development, Nel is strongly expressed in the presumptive retinal pigment epithelium and RGCs. Nel overexpression in the developing retina by in ovo electroporation increases the number of RGCs, whereas the number of displaced amacrine cells decreases. Conversely, knockdown of Nel expression by transposon-mediated introduction of RNA interference constructs results in decrease in RGC number and increase in the number of displaced amacrine cells. Modifications of Nel expression levels do not appear to affect proliferation of retinal progenitor cells, but they significantly alter the progression rate of RGC differentiation from the central retina to the periphery. Furthermore, Nel protects RGCs from apoptosis during retinal development. These results indicate that Nel positively regulates RGC production by promoting their differentiation and survival during development.

Specification of retinotectal connexions during development of the toad Xenopus laevis

Development ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-92
Author(s):  
S. C. Sharma ◽  
J. G. Hollyfield
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Optic Tectum ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
The Other ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Visual Projection ◽  
Series Of Experiments ◽  
The Right

The specification of central connexions of retinal ganglion cells was studied in Xenopus laevis. In one series of experiments, the right eye primordium was rotated 180° at embryonic stages 24–32. In the other series, the left eye was transplanted into the right orbit, and vice versa, with either 0° or 180° rotation. After metamorphosis the visual projections from the operated eye to the contralateral optic tectum were mapped electrophysiologically and compared with the normal retinotectal map. In all cases the visual projection map was rotated through the same angle as was indicated by the position of the choroidal fissure. The left eye exchanged into the right orbit retained its original axes and projected to the contralateral tectum. These results suggest that retinal ganglion cell connexions are specified before stage 24.

scholarly journals Expression of a Barhl1a reporter in subsets of retinal ganglion cells and commissural neurons of the developing zebrafish brain

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahad Albadri ◽  
Olivier Armant ◽  
Tairi Aljand-Geschwill ◽  
Filippo Del Bene ◽  
Matthias Carl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Optic Chiasm ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Commissural Neurons ◽  
Axonal Projections ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
And Function

AbstractPromoting the regeneration or survival of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is one focus of regenerative medicine. Homeobox Barhl transcription factors might be instrumental in these processes. In mammals, only barhl2 is expressed in the retina and is required for both subtype identity acquisition of amacrine cells and for the survival of RGCs downstream of Atoh7, a transcription factor necessary for RGC genesis. The underlying mechanisms of this dual role of Barhl2 in mammals have remained elusive. Whole genome duplication in the teleost lineage generated the barhl1a and barhl2 paralogues. In the Zebrafish retina, Barhl2 functions as determinant of subsets of amacrine cells lineally related to RGCs independently of Atoh7. In contrast, barhl1a expression depends on Atoh7 but its expression dynamics and function have not been studied. Here we describe for the first time a Barhl1a:GFP reporter line in vivo showing that Barhl1a turns on exclusively in subsets of RGCs and their post-mitotic precursors. We also show transient expression of Barhl1a:GFP in diencephalic neurons extending their axonal projections as part of the post-optic commissure, at the time of optic chiasm formation. This work sets the ground for future studies on RGC subtype identity, axonal projections and genetic specification of Barhl1a-positive RGCs and commissural neurons.

The development of the pattern of retinal ganglion cells in the chick retina: mechanisms that control differentiation

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (24) ◽  
pp. 5713-5724 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.L. McCabe ◽  
E.C. Gunther ◽  
T.A. Reh
Keyword(s):  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Peripheral Retina ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Fgf Receptor ◽  
Chick Retina ◽  
Regular Arrays

Neurons in both vertebrate and invertebrate eyes are organized in regular arrays. Although much is known about the mechanisms involved in the formation of the regular arrays of neurons found in invertebrate eyes, much less is known about the mechanisms of formation of neuronal mosaics in the vertebrate eye. The purpose of these studies was to determine the cellular mechanisms that pattern the first neurons in vertebrate retina, the retinal ganglion cells. We have found that the ganglion cells in the chick retina develop as a patterned array that spreads from the central to peripheral retina as a wave front of differentiation. The onset of ganglion cell differentiation keeps pace with overall retinal growth; however, there is no clear cell cycle synchronization at the front of differentiation of the first ganglion cells. The differentiation of ganglion cells is not dependent on signals from previously formed ganglion cells, since isolation of the peripheral retina by as much as 400 μm from the front of ganglion cell differentiation does not prevent new ganglion cells from developing. Consistent with previous studies, blocking FGF receptor activation with a specific inhibitor to the FGFRs retards the movement of the front of ganglion cell differentiation, while application of exogenous FGF1 causes the precocious development of ganglion cells in peripheral retina. Our observations, taken together with those of previous studies, support a role for FGFs and FGF receptor activation in the initial development of retinal ganglion cells from the undifferentiated neuroepithelium peripheral to the expanding wave front of differentiation.

Characterization of Spontaneous Inhibitory Synaptic Currents in Salamander Retinal Ganglion Cells

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 1752-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Gao ◽  
Samuel M. Wu
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Synaptic Vesicles ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Equilibrium Potential ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Light Onset ◽  
Synaptic Currents ◽  
Postsynaptic Currents

Gao, Fan and Samuel M. Wu. Characterization of spontaneous inhibitory synaptic currents in salamander retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1752–1764, 1998. Spontaneous and light-evoked postsynaptic currents (sPSCs and lePSCs, respectively) in retinal ganglion cells of the larval tiger salamander were recorded under voltage-clamp conditions from living retinal slices. The focus of this study is to characterize the spontaneous inhibitory PSCs (sIPSCs) and their contribution to the light-evoked inhibitory PSCs (leIPSCs) in on-off ganglion cells. sIPSCs were isolated from spontaneous excitatory PSCs (sEPSCs) by application of 10 μM 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX) + 50 μM 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5). In ∼70% of on-off ganglion cells, bicuculline (or picrotoxin) completely blocks sIPSCs, suggesting all sIPSCs in these cells are mediated by GABAergic synaptic vesicles and γ-aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) receptors (GABAergic sIPSCs, or GABAsIPSCs). In the remaining 30% of on-off ganglion cells, bicuculline (or picrotoxin) blocks 70–98% of the sIPSCs, and the remaining 2–30% are blocked by strychnine (glycinergic sIPSCs, or GLYsIPSCs). GABAsIPSCs occur randomly with an exponentially distributed interval probability density function, and they persist without noticeable rundown over time. The GABAsIPSC frequency is greatly reduced by cobalt, consistent with the idea that they are largely mediated by calcium-dependent vesicular release. GABAsIPSCs in DNQX + AP5 are tetrodotoxin (TTX) insensitive, suggesting that amacrine cells that release GABA under these conditions do not generate spontaneous action potentials. The average GABAsIPSCs exhibited linear current-voltage relation with a reversal potential near the chloride equilibrium potential, and an average peak conductance of 319.67 ± 252.83 (SD) pS. For GLYsIPSCs, the average peak conductance increase is 301.68 ± 94.34 pS. These parameters are of the same order of magnitude as those measured in inhibitory miniature postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) associated with single synaptic vesicles in the CNS. The amplitude histograms of GABAsIPSCs did not exhibit multiple peaks, suggesting that the larger events are not discrete multiples of elementary events (or quanta). We propose that each GABAsIPSC or GLYsIPSC in retinal ganglion cells is mediated by a single or synchronized multiple of synaptic vesicles with variable neurotransmitter contents. In a sample of 16 on-off ganglion cells, the average peak leIPSC (held at 0 mV) at the light onset is 509.0 ± 233.85 pA and that at the light offset is 529.0 ± 339.88 pA. The approximate number of GABAsIPSCs and GLYsIPSCs required to generate the average light responses, calculated by the ratio of the charge (area under current traces) of the leIPSCs to that of the average single sIPSCs, is 118 ± 52 for the light onset, and 132 ± 76 for the light offset.

scholarly journals PTEN Expression Regulates Gap Junction Connectivity in the Retina

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley M. Chen ◽  
Shaghauyegh S. Azar ◽  
Alexander Harris ◽  
Nicholas C. Brecha ◽  
Luis Pérez de Sevilla Müller
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junction ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Dendritic Structure ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Cell Coupling ◽  
Cell Degeneration

Manipulation of the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) pathway has been suggested as a therapeutic approach to treat or prevent vision loss due to retinal disease. In this study, we investigated the effects of deleting one copy of Pten in a well-characterized class of retinal ganglion cells called α-ganglion cells in the mouse retina. In Pten+/– retinas, α-ganglion cells did not exhibit major changes in their dendritic structure, although most cells developed a few, unusual loop-forming dendrites. By contrast, α-ganglion cells exhibited a significant decrease in heterologous and homologous gap junction mediated cell coupling with other retinal ganglion and amacrine cells. Additionally, the majority of OFF α-ganglion cells (12/18 cells) formed novel coupling to displaced amacrine cells. The number of connexin36 puncta, the predominant connexin that mediates gap junction communication at electrical synapses, was decreased by at least 50% on OFF α-ganglion cells. Reduced and incorrect gap junction connectivity of α-ganglion cells will affect their functional properties and alter visual image processing in the retina. The anomalous connectivity of retinal ganglion cells would potentially limit future therapeutic approaches involving manipulation of the Pten pathway for treating ganglion cell degeneration in diseases like glaucoma, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s diseases.

scholarly journals Animal Models of Glaucoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachida A. Bouhenni ◽  
Jeffrey Dunmire ◽  
Abby Sewell ◽  
Deepak P. Edward
Keyword(s):  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Animal Models ◽  
Visual Impairment ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Suitable Model ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Ideal Model ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Pathophysiologic Mechanisms

Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of disorders that progressively lead to blindness due to loss of retinal ganglion cells and damage to the optic nerve. It is a leading cause of blindness and visual impairment worldwide. Although research in the field of glaucoma is substantial, the pathophysiologic mechanisms causing the disease are not completely understood. A wide variety of animal models have been used to study glaucoma. These include monkeys, dogs, cats, rodents, and several other species. Although these models have provided valuable information about the disease, there is still no ideal model for studying glaucoma due to its complexity. In this paper we present a summary of most of the animal models that have been developed and used for the study of the different types of glaucoma, the strengths and limitations associated with each species use, and some potential criteria to develop a suitable model.

Disruption of transient photoreceptor targeting within the inner plexiform layer following early ablation of cholinergic amacrine cells in the ferret

2001 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 741-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.T. JOHNSON ◽  
M.A. RAVEN ◽  
B.E. REESE
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Subcutaneous Injections ◽  
Cell Processes ◽  
Cholinergic Amacrine Cells

Photoreceptors in the ferret's retina have been shown to project transiently to the inner plexiform layer (IPL) prior to their differentiation of an outer segment. On postnatal day 15 (P-15), when this projection achieves maximal density, the photoreceptors projecting into the IPL extend primarily to one of two depths, coincident with the processes of cholinergic amacrine cells. The present study has used an excitotoxic approach employing subcutaneous injections of l-glutamate to ablate these cholinergic amacrine cells on P-7, in order to see whether their elimination alters this targeting of photoreceptor terminals within the IPL. The near-complete elimination of cholinergic amacrine cells at P-15 was confirmed, although the population of retinal ganglion cells was also affected, being depleted by roughly 50%. The rod opsin-immunopositive terminals in such treated ferrets no longer showed a stratified distribution, being found throughout the depth of the IPL, as well as extending into the ganglion cell layer. This effect should not be due to the partial loss of retinal ganglion cells, however, since optic nerve transection at P-2, which eliminates the ganglion cells entirely while leaving the cholinergic amacrine cell population intact, was shown not to affect the stratification pattern of the photoreceptors within the IPL. These results strongly suggest that the targeting of the photoreceptor terminals to discrete strata within the IPL is dependent upon the cholinergic amacrine cell processes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document