scholarly journals Inactive status is an independent predictor of liver transplant waitlist mortality and is associated with a transplant centers median meld at transplant

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260000
Author(s):  
Jonathan Merola ◽  
Geliang Gan ◽  
Darren Stewart ◽  
Samantha Noreen ◽  
David Mulligan ◽  
...  

Background Approximately 30% of patients on the liver transplant waitlist experience at least one inactive status change which makes them temporarily ineligible to receive a deceased donor transplant. We hypothesized that inactive status would be associated with higher mortality which may differ on a transplant centers’ or donor service areas’ (DSA) Median MELD at Transplant (MMaT). Methods Multi-state models were constructed (OPTN database;06/18/2013-06/08/2018) using DSA-level and transplant center-level data where MMaT were numerically ranked and categorized into tertiles. Hazards ratios were calculated between DSA and transplant center tertiles, stratified by MELD score, to determine differences in inactive to active transition probabilities. Results 7,625 (30.2% of sample registrants;25,216 total) experienced at least one inactive status change in the DSA-level cohort and 7,623 experienced at least one inactive status change in the transplant-center level cohort (30.2% of sample registrants;25,211 total). Inactive patients with MELD≤34 had a higher probability of becoming re-activated if they were waitlisted in a low or medium MMaT transplant center or DSA. Transplant rates were higher and lower re-activation probability was associated with higher mortality for the MELD 26–34 group in the high MMaT tertile. There were no significant differences in re-activation, transplant probability, or waitlist mortality for inactivated patients with MELD≥35 regardless of a DSA’s or center’s MMaT. Conclusion This study shows that an inactive status change is independently associated with waitlist mortality. This association differs by a centers’ and a DSAs’ MMaT. Prioritization through care coordination to resolve issues of inactivity is fundamental to improving access.

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago RODRÍGUEZ ◽  
Alfeu de Medeiros FLECK JR ◽  
Marcos MUCENIC ◽  
Cláudio MARRONI ◽  
Ajacio BRANDÃO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: In Brazil, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is used to prioritize patients for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receive standardized MELD exception points to account for their cancer risk of mortality, which is not reflected by their MELD score. OBJECTIVE: To compare DDLT rates between patients with and without HCC in Rio Grande do Sul, the Southernmost state of Brazil. METHODS - We retrospectively studied 825 patients on the liver-transplant waiting list from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016, in a transplant center located in Porto Alegre, the capital of Rio Grande do Sul, to compare DDLT rates between those with and without HCC. The time-varying hazard of waiting list/DDLT was estimated, reporting the subhazard ratio (SHR) of waiting list/DDLT/dropout with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The final competing risk model was adjusted for age, MELD score, exception points, and ABO group. RESULTS: Patients with HCC underwent a transplant almost three times faster than patients with a calculated MELD score (SHR 2.64; 95% CI 2.10-3.31; P<0.001). The DDLT rate per 100 person-months was 11.86 for HCC patients vs 3.38 for non-HCC patients. The median time on the waiting list was 5.6 months for patients with HCC and 25 months for patients without HCC. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that, in our center, patients on the waiting list with HCC have a clear advantage over candidates listed with a calculated MELD score.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihiro Kitajima ◽  
Dilip Moonka ◽  
Sirisha Yeddula ◽  
Kelly Collins ◽  
Michael Rizzari ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (S3) ◽  
pp. S213-S213
Author(s):  
Ramesh Batra ◽  
Samantha Noreen ◽  
Darren Stewart ◽  
Danielle Haakinson ◽  
Geliang Gan ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S566-S567
Author(s):  
C. Kaltenmeier ◽  
E. Ashwat ◽  
S. Tohme ◽  
M. Molinari

Author(s):  
Isadore Budnick ◽  
Jessica Davis ◽  
Anirudh Sundararaghavan ◽  
Samuel Konkol ◽  
Chelsea Lau ◽  
...  

Background: Fibrinogen (FIB) levels less than 150 mg/dL have been associated with increased rates of bleeding and lower survival in critically ill cirrhosis patients. Objective: We aimed to determine if treatment with cryoprecipitate (CRYO) for low FIB levels were associated with bleeding complications or survival. Patients / Methods: 237 cirrhosis patients admitted to an intensive care unit at a tertiary care liver transplant center with initial FIB levels less than 150 mg/dL were retrospectively assessed for CRYO transfusion, bleeding events, and survival outcomes. Results: The mean MELD score was 27.2 (95% CI 26.0 - 28.3) and CLIF-C Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) score was 53.4 (51.9 - 54.8). Ninety-nine (41.8%) were admitted for acute bleeding and the remainder were admitted for non-bleeding illnesses. FIB level on admission correlated strongly with disease severity. After adjusting for disease severity, FIB on admission was not an independent predictor of 30-day survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99 - 1.01, p = 0.68). CRYO transfusion increased FIB levels but had no independent effect on mortality or bleeding complications (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.72 - 1.70, p = 0.65). Conclusions: In cirrhosis patients with critical illness, low FIB levels on presentation reflect severity of illness but are not independently associated with 30-day mortality. Treatment of low FIB with CRYO also does not affect survival or bleeding complications suggesting FIB is an additional marker of severity of illness but is not itself a direct factor in the pathophysiology of bleeding in critically ill cirrhosis patients.


Hepatology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1311-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norah A. Terrault ◽  
R. Todd Stravitz ◽  
Anna S.F. Lok ◽  
Greg T. Everson ◽  
Robert S. Brown ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document