scholarly journals Protocol for Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia (ELISA): A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0261474
Author(s):  
Melissa D. Stockbridge ◽  
Julius Fridriksson ◽  
Souvik Sen ◽  
Leonardo Bonilha ◽  
Argye E. Hillis

In this forthcoming multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, we will investigate the augmentative effects of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, escitalopram, on language therapy in individuals with post-stroke aphasia. We hypothesize that, when combined with language therapy, daily escitalopram will result in greater improvement than placebo in an untrained picture naming task (Philadelphia Naming Test short form) administered one week after the end of language therapy. We also will examine whether escitalopram’s effect on language is independent of its effect on depression, varies with lesion location, or is associated with increased functional connectivity within the left hemisphere. Finally, we will examine whether individuals with BDNF met alleles show reduced response to treatment and reduced changes in connectivity. We expect to enroll 88 participants over four years. Participants are given escitalopram or placebo within one week of their stroke for 90 days and receive fifteen 45-minute computer-delivered sessions of language treatment beginning 60 days from the start of drug therapy. Patients then complete a comprehensive assessment of language at one, five, and twenty weeks after the last language therapy session. ELISA is the first randomized, controlled trial evaluating the effect of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor on the improvement of language in people with aphasia undergoing language treatment during the acute to subacute post-stroke period. Trial registration: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03843463.

2004 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita H. Clayton ◽  
Julia K. Warnock ◽  
Susan G. Kornstein ◽  
Relana Pinkerton ◽  
Adrienne Sheldon-Keller ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 155 (05) ◽  
pp. 667-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric D. Peselow ◽  
Michael Stanley ◽  
Ann-Marie Filippi ◽  
Faouzia Barouche ◽  
Paul Goodnick ◽  
...  

We evaluated the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) as a predictor of response to drugs and placebo in 105 patients, in a large double-blind placebo-controlled out-patient trial to determine the efficacy of paroxetine HCI, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, compared with that of imipramine HCI and placebo. The presence of a positive or negative DST did not predict response to either paroxetine or imipramine. However, a positive DST predicted a poorer response to placebo: only 3 out of 18 patients who showed DST non-suppression responded to placebo, as opposed to 11 out of 21 who exhibited DST suppression (P<0.05). A positive DST was associated with a 61% response to drugs and a 16% response to placebo. This finding suggests that the presence of a positive DST implies the need for active somatic treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document