Electrophysiologic Evidence of Neural Injury or Adaptation in Cocaine Dependence

2003 ◽  
pp. 131-154
Author(s):  
Kenneth R. Alper ◽  
Leslie S. Prichep ◽  
E. Roy John ◽  
Sharon C. Kowalik ◽  
Mitchell S. Rosenthal
Author(s):  
Anna R. Childress ◽  
A. Thomas McLellan ◽  
Ronald Ehrman ◽  
Charles P. O'Brien

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 405-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Griffith ◽  
Radhesh Krishna Lalam

AbstractWhen it comes to examining the brachial plexus, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are complementary investigations. US is well placed for screening most extraforaminal pathologies, whereas MRI is more sensitive and accurate for specific clinical indications. For example, MRI is probably the preferred technique for assessment of trauma because it enables a thorough evaluation of both the intraspinal and extraspinal elements, although US can depict extraforaminal neural injury with a high level of accuracy. Conversely, US is probably the preferred technique for examination of neurologic amyotrophy because a more extensive involvement beyond the brachial plexus is the norm, although MRI is more sensitive than US for evaluating muscle denervation associated with this entity. With this synergy in mind, this review highlights the tips for examining the brachial plexus with US and MRI.


1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Malcolm ◽  
Joem D. Phillips ◽  
Kathleen T. Brady ◽  
John R. Roberts
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen T. Brady ◽  
Bonnie S. Dansky ◽  
Susan C. Sonne ◽  
Michael E. Saladin

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Malcolm ◽  
Juliann W. Moore ◽  
Daniel K. Kajdasz ◽  
Carolyn E. Cochrane

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document