scholarly journals Reading Fiction, Talking Reconciliation: Australian Book Clubs, Book Talk and the Politics of History

2021 ◽  
pp. 231-242
Author(s):  
Maggie Nolan ◽  
Robert Clarke ◽  
Rebekah Brown
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Buck ◽  
Rena Subotnik ◽  
Frank Worrell ◽  
Paula Olszewski-Kubilius ◽  
Chi Wang

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Buckridge

When considering the question of reading provision in remote regions, Australian historians have tended to focus on the challenge of distributing books and other reading matter affordably across vast and sparsely populated areas. In the back-blocks of Western Queensland between the wars, however, the problem of distribution had been addressed with some success: by mail orders to metropolitan book retailers, subsidised postal rates, local Schools of Arts libraries, the Workers’ Educational Association and, above all, the efficient operations of the Queensland Bush Book Club, which performed extraordinary feats of remote distribution throughout the interwar period. Isolated booklovers could almost take for granted a steady — if somewhat limited and belated — supply of books to read. Two things they could not take for granted, however, were reliable, disinterested and informed advice about what books to choose (where choice was available) and — even more important — the opportunity to share their reading experiences with others. Walter Murdoch once said, ‘It is a basic fact that when you have read a book you want to talk about it.’ That may overstate the case a little, but there is no doubt that the desire to communicate the pleasures, occasional disappointments and sense of discovery in reading books — no matter how solitary the reading experience itself may have been — was and is very strong and widespread, and that single families or households did not then (and do not now) necessarily provide congenial environments for such ‘book talk’.


Dialogue ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-517
Author(s):  
Jay F. Rosenberg

A Philosopher writes a book about ontology and the philosophy of language. That is, the first parts of his book talk explicitly about ontology; the latter parts, explicitly about language. And there are some propositions which are about both. It is a difficult book, and would-be commentators cast about for some way to approach it. In most cases, they will resolve their quandaries by plunging in at the beginning and doggedly making their respective ways to the end. But some may notice that the book as a whole is dominated by one key idea. And that, in turn, may lead them to reflect that perhaps it might prove more edifying to begin with language.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document