THE MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE INTEREST RATE DECISION IN TURKEY IN THE 2007-2012 PERIOD, AND ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF THE CRISIS IN TURKEY IN 2008

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (XXVI) ◽  
pp. 719-740.
Author(s):  
ŞAHİN ÇETİNKAYA
2001 ◽  
Vol 175 ◽  
pp. 59-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. E. Goodhart

Given the long and variable time lags between interest rate changes and responses in output and inflation, an inflation forecast must lie at the heart of monetary policy. In the UK the Bank's inflation forecast and Report were developed when the interest rate decision still lay with the Chancellor. Its, largely unchanged, continuation has led to certain tensions once that decision was delegated to a Monetary Policy Committee of independently responsible experts. In this paper the question is raised whether such a Committee should be jointly and individually responsible for the inflation forecast, and what might be considered as alternative procedures.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Szilard Erhart ◽  
Harmen Lehment ◽  
Jose L. Vasquez Paz

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etienne Farvaque ◽  
Piotr Stanek ◽  
Hakim Hammadou

Abstract This paper starts by describing the composition of monetary policy committees (MPCs) in inflation-targeting and non-targeting countries. The experience of MPC members on their inflation performance is then compared, opposing inflation targeters with non-targeters. Our sample covers the major Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries, in the period 1999-2008. Our results first show that MPCs are different in inflation-targeting (versus non-targeting) countries. They also reveal that policy-makers’ backgrounds influence inflation, and that the influence of MPCs’ experience is much greater in inflation-targeting countries, while size effects are more important for committees that do not target inflation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document