The Significance of Correlating Incidental Bowel Wall Thickening on CT with Endoscopic Evaluation

2006 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. S205
Author(s):  
G. Patricia Ayala ◽  
Cindy Huang ◽  
David M. Jones ◽  
Seth Richter
2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
MM Uzzaman ◽  
A Alam ◽  
MS Nair ◽  
R Borgstein ◽  
L Meleagros

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to conduct retrospective analysis of abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) reports, identifying those patients in whom bowel wall thickening (BWT) was observed, and to correlate these reports with subsequent endoscopic evaluation. METHODS Formal reports for all patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT between February 2007 and September 2009 were reviewed. Where patients were identified as having colorectal ‘wall thickening’, results of subsequent endoscopic evaluations were documented. Only those patients with a report of BWT who had follow-up endoscopy (colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy) were included in the analysis. RESULTS A total of 165 patients were included. Abnormalities on endoscopy at the exact site of the BWT on CT were found in 95 patients (57.58%); in 36 cases (21.82%) this was a malignant lesion. BWT of the transverse colon was significantly more likely to correspond to an endoscopic finding of cancer than other sites (p=0.034). Rectal bleeding was reported significantly more often in patients with BWT and neoplastic disease on endoscopy compared with those with normal endoscopy (p=0.04). Excluding patients with inflammatory/diverticular lesions, 59.02% of Caucasians had a neoplastic lesion at the site of reported BWT, significantly higher than the other ethnic groups (p=0.008). There were 38 patients (23.03%) who did not present with bowel symptoms and, of these, 6 were diagnosed subsequently with colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS This study supports endoscopic evaluation to investigate patients with CT evidence of BWT, especially in cases involving the transverse colon, in Caucasian patients or in association with symptoms of rectal bleeding.


2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 601-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Troppmann ◽  
Elisabeth Lippert ◽  
Okka W. Hamer ◽  
Gabriele Kirchner ◽  
Esther Endlicher

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. S591
Author(s):  
Pierre Hindy ◽  
Ismet Lukolic ◽  
Asra Batool ◽  
Cynthia Victor ◽  
Brian Markowitz ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arda Isik ◽  
Mehmet Soyturk ◽  
Sakir Süleyman ◽  
Deniz Firat ◽  
Kemal Peker ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
In Young Bae ◽  
Mi Young Kim ◽  
Chang Hea Suh ◽  
Soon Gu Cho ◽  
Jin Hee Kim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-368
Author(s):  
Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar ◽  
Kishore Kumar Mani ◽  
Hisham Alwakkaa ◽  
James Shina

Epiploic appendages are peritoneal structures that arise from the outer serosal surface of the bowel wall towards the peritoneal pouch. They are filled with adipose tissue and contain a vascular stalk. Epiploic appendagitis is a rare cause of acute lower abdominal pain. It most commonly results from torsion and inflammation of the epiploic appendages, and its clinical features mimic acute diverticulitis or acute appendicitis resulting in being often misdiagnosed as diverticulitis or appendicitis. This frequently leads to unnecessary hospitalization, antibiotic administration, and unwarranted surgeries. Epiploic appendagitis is usually diagnosed with CT imaging, and the classic CT findings include: (i) fat-density ovoid lesion (hyperattenuating ring sign), (ii) mild bowel wall thickening, and (iii) a central high-attenuation focus within the fatty lesion (central dot sign). It is treated conservatively, and symptoms typically resolve in a few days. Therefore, epiploic appendagitis should be considered as one of the differential diagnosis for acute lower abdominal pain and prompt diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis can avoid unnecessary hospitalization and surgical intervention. In this case report, we discuss a 72-year-old woman who presented with a 2-day history of acute left lower abdominal pain.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 20200016
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Sacks ◽  
Seymour Atlas ◽  
Alar Enno ◽  
Leonardo Santos ◽  
Jeremy Humphries ◽  
...  

Colonic adenomas are commonly encountered lesions that are a precursor of colorectal cancer. Of these, villous adenomas are a rarer, more advanced subtype that are larger in size than tubular adenomas and have a higher risk of malignant transformation. We present a patient with a giant villous adenoma of the sigmoid colon identified on CT as homogeneous segmental bowel wall thickening.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Xia Wang ◽  
Xiaoyan Tian ◽  
Yongping Cai ◽  
Xingwang Wu

Aim. To improve the identification and computed tomography (CT) diagnostic accuracy of chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated enteritis (CAEAE) by evaluating its CT findings and clinical manifestation. Methods. The data of three patients with pathologically and clinically confirmed CAEAE who underwent CT enterography (CTE) were retrospectively reviewed from January 2018 to October 2019. The following data were evaluated: imaging characteristics (length of involvement, pattern of mural thickening, pattern of attenuation, perienteric abnormalities), clinical symptoms, endoscopic records, laboratory examinations, and pathologic findings. Results. Based on CT findings, two patients demonstrated segmental bowel wall thickening (involvement length >6 cm), asymmetric thickening, layered attenuation, fat stranding, and adenopathy, whereas the remaining one had no positive finding. The endoscopic results of all patients showed numerous irregular ulcers in the colon, and one patient had a focal esophageal ulcer. The major clinical symptoms were abdominal pain (n=3), retrosternal pain (n=1), fever (n=3), diarrhea (n=2), hematochezia (n=1), and adenopathy (n=3). The main laboratory examination indicators were increased serum EBV DNA load (n=1) and increased inflammatory markers (n=3). With regard to the main pathologic findings, all patients showed positive EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) situ hybridization in the colonic biopsy specimen, with one patient being positive in the esophagus. Conclusion. CAEAE is rare and is usually misdiagnosed as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The imaging features of CAEAE overlap with those of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. The presence of segmental and asymmetric bowel wall thickening, layered attenuation, and fat stranding in the CTE image may be helpful in differentiating CAEAE from IBD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document