Commentary on “Pain Scores and Exposure Rates after Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse”

2015 ◽  
Vol 108 (12) ◽  
pp. 722-723
Author(s):  
Alex Gomelsky
2015 ◽  
Vol 108 (12) ◽  
pp. 715-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana D. Illston ◽  
Jeffrey B. Garris ◽  
Holly E. Richter ◽  
Thomas L. Wheeler

Author(s):  
William R. Barone ◽  
Rouzbeh Amini ◽  
Spandan Maiti ◽  
Pamela Moalli ◽  
Steven Abramowitch

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is defined as the descent of the pelvic organs into the vaginal canal. POP is a widespread condition among women, with a 7% lifetime risk for a single operation1. For surgical treatment, polypropylene mesh is often implanted to restore support to the pelvic organs. However, up to 20% of those who undergo surgery with mesh will require repeat operations for recurrent symptoms or complications2. One of the most common complications is mesh erosion3. Erosion is characterized by degeneration of the native vaginal tissue in contact with the mesh, resulting in the mesh migrating through the vagina. Though the cause of mesh erosion is undefined, surgeons have described this complication by the appearance of mesh “contraction”, “buckling”, “wrinkling”, and/or “bunching”. Some have even described this as an “accordion effect”.


2011 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozren Grgic ◽  
Slavko Oreskovic ◽  
Helena L. Grsic ◽  
Drzislav Kalafatic ◽  
Tomislav Zupic ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 126-129
Author(s):  
Wojciech Majkusiak ◽  
Edyta Horosz ◽  
Paweł Tomasik ◽  
Aneta Zwierzchowska ◽  
Mirosław Wielgoś ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 919-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farnaz A. Ganj ◽  
Okechukwu A. Ibeanu ◽  
Ahmet Bedestani ◽  
Thomas E. Nolan ◽  
Ralph R. Chesson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document