scholarly journals Method for Rainfall Rate Estimation with Satellite based Microwave Radiometer Data

Author(s):  
Kohei Arai
2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 731-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengzheng Li ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Scott E. Giangrande

Abstract This study develops a Gaussian mixture rainfall-rate estimator (GMRE) for polarimetric radar-based rainfall-rate estimation, following a general framework based on the Gaussian mixture model and Bayes least squares estimation for weather radar–based parameter estimations. The advantages of GMRE are 1) it is a minimum variance unbiased estimator; 2) it is a general estimator applicable to different rain regimes in different regions; and 3) it is flexible and may incorporate/exclude different polarimetric radar variables as inputs. This paper also discusses training the GMRE and the sensitivity of performance to mixture number. A large radar and surface gauge observation dataset collected in central Oklahoma during the multiyear Joint Polarization Experiment (JPOLE) field campaign is used to evaluate the GMRE approach. Results indicate that the GMRE approach can outperform existing polarimetric rainfall techniques optimized for this JPOLE dataset in terms of bias and root-mean-square error.


2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1547-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Root ◽  
T-Y. Yu ◽  
M. Yeary ◽  
M. B. Richman

Abstract Radar measurements are useful for determining rainfall rates because of their ability to cover large areas. Unfortunately, estimating rainfall rates from radar reflectivity data alone is prone to errors resulting from variations in drop size distributions, precipitation types, and other physics that cannot be represented in a simple, one-dimensional Z–R relationship. However, improving estimates is possible by utilizing additional inputs, thereby increasing the dimensionality of the model. The main purpose of this study is to determine the value of surface observations for improving rainfall-rate estimation. This work carefully designed an artificial neural network to fit a model that would relate radar reflectivity, surface temperature, humidity, pressure, and wind to observed rainfall rates. Observations taken over 13 years from the Oklahoma Mesonet and the KTLX WSR-88D radar near Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, were used for the training dataset. While the artificial neural network underestimated rainfall rates for higher reflectivities, it did have an overall better performance than the best-fit Z–R relation. Most importantly, it is shown that the surface data contributed significant value to an unaugmented radar-based rainfall-rate estimation model.


2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-223
Author(s):  
R. Mardiana ◽  
T. Iguchi ◽  
N. Takahashi ◽  
H. Hanado

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 2469-2489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian Manz ◽  
Sebastián Páez-Bimos ◽  
Natalia Horna ◽  
Wouter Buytaert ◽  
Boris Ochoa-Tocachi ◽  
...  

Abstract An initial ground validation of the Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Day-1 product from March 2014 to August 2015 is presented for the tropical Andes. IMERG was evaluated along with the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) against 302 quality-controlled rain gauges across Ecuador and Peru. Detection, quantitative estimation statistics, and probability distribution functions are calculated at different spatial (0.1°, 0.25°) and temporal (1 h, 3 h, daily) scales. Precipitation products are analyzed for hydrometeorologically distinct subregions. Results show that IMERG has a superior detection and quantitative rainfall intensity estimation ability than TMPA, particularly in the high Andes. Despite slightly weaker agreement of mean rainfall fields, IMERG shows better characterization of gauge observations when separating rainfall detection and rainfall rate estimation. At corresponding space–time scales, IMERG shows better estimation of gauge rainfall probability distributions than TMPA. However, IMERG shows no improvement in both rainfall detection and rainfall rate estimation along the dry Peruvian coastline, where major random and systematic errors persist. Further research is required to identify which rainfall intensities are missed or falsely detected and how errors can be attributed to specific satellite sensor retrievals. The satellite–gauge difference was associated with the point-area difference in spatial support between gauges and satellite precipitation products, particularly in areas with low and irregular gauge network coverage. Future satellite–gauge evaluations need to identify such locations and investigate more closely interpixel point-area differences before attributing uncertainties to satellite products.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document