Chapter 3 Domestic Shocks

2021 ◽  
pp. 64-121
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (78) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashoka Mody ◽  
Alina Carare ◽  
◽  

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 445-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Cornand ◽  
Pauline Gandré ◽  
Céline Gimet

Author(s):  
Christopher Erceg ◽  
Christopher Gust ◽  
David López-Salido

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (906) ◽  
pp. 1-71
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Erceg ◽  
◽  
Christopher J. Gust ◽  
J. David López-Salido
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
pp. 449-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Caselli ◽  
Miklós Koren ◽  
Milan Lisicky ◽  
Silvana Tenreyro

Abstract A widely held view is that openness to international trade leads to higher income volatility, as trade increases specialization and hence exposure to sector-specific shocks. Contrary to this common wisdom, we argue that when country-wide shocks are important, openness to international trade can lower income volatility by reducing exposure to domestic shocks and allowing countries to diversify the sources of demand and supply across countries. Using a quantitative model of trade, we assess the importance of the two mechanisms (sectoral specialization and cross-country diversification) and show that in recent decades international trade has reduced economic volatility for most countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document