Domestic Shocks

2021 ◽  
pp. 64-121
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (78) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashoka Mody ◽  
Alina Carare ◽  
◽  

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 445-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Cornand ◽  
Pauline Gandré ◽  
Céline Gimet

Author(s):  
Christopher Erceg ◽  
Christopher Gust ◽  
David López-Salido

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (906) ◽  
pp. 1-71
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Erceg ◽  
◽  
Christopher J. Gust ◽  
J. David López-Salido
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
pp. 449-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Caselli ◽  
Miklós Koren ◽  
Milan Lisicky ◽  
Silvana Tenreyro

Abstract A widely held view is that openness to international trade leads to higher income volatility, as trade increases specialization and hence exposure to sector-specific shocks. Contrary to this common wisdom, we argue that when country-wide shocks are important, openness to international trade can lower income volatility by reducing exposure to domestic shocks and allowing countries to diversify the sources of demand and supply across countries. Using a quantitative model of trade, we assess the importance of the two mechanisms (sectoral specialization and cross-country diversification) and show that in recent decades international trade has reduced economic volatility for most countries.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (281) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Pienkowski

This paper outlines a simple three-country macroeconomic model designed to focus on the transmission of external shocks to Portugal. Building on the framework developed by Berg et al (2006), this model differentiates between shocks originating from both inside and outside the euro area, as well as domestic shocks, each of which have different implications for Portugal. This framework is also used to consider the dynamics of the Portuguese economy over recent decades. The model, which is designed to guide forecasts and undertake simulations, can easily be modified for use in other small euro area countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document