2. The Production and Classification of Speech Sounds

2016 ◽  
pp. 44-83
Keyword(s):  
Speech Sounds

A new front-end for classification of non-speech sounds: a study on human whistle

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahesh Kumar Nandwana ◽  
Hynek Bořil ◽  
John H. L. Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Speech Sounds ◽  
Front End

Dissociating Face Processing Skills: Decisions about Lip read Speech, Expression, and Identity

1996 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Campbell ◽  
Barbara Brooks ◽  
Edward de Haan ◽  
Tony Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Face Processing ◽  
Face Identification ◽  
Speech Sounds ◽  
Manual Responses ◽  
Lip Reading ◽  
Identity Matching ◽  
Unfamiliar Face ◽  
Identity Based ◽  
Series Of Experiments

The separability of different subcomponents of face processing has been regularly affirmed, but not always so clearly demonstrated. In particular, the ability to extract speech from faces (lip-reading) has been shown to dissociate doubly from face identification in neurological but not in other populations. In this series of experiments with undergraduates, the classification of speech sounds (lip-reading) from personally familiar and unfamiliar face photographs was explored using speeded manual responses. The independence of lip-reading from identity-based processing was confirmed. Furthermore, the established pattern of independence of expression-matching from, and dependence of identity-matching on, face familiarity was extended to personally familiar faces and “difficult”-emotion decisions. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Visual classification of speech sounds

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bozydar L. J. Kaczmarek
Keyword(s):  
Speech Sounds ◽  
Visual Classification

scholarly journals Approach to More Efficient Segmentation and Classification of Speech Sounds

1968 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 366-366
Author(s):  
William J. Beninghof ◽  
Myron Jay Ross
Keyword(s):  
Speech Sounds

Reduced Accuracy of Classification with a Short Form of the Speech Sounds Perception Test

1981 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 1003-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Snow ◽  
S. Sheese
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Speech Sounds ◽  
Long Form

This study attempted to cross-validate the accuracy in classification of Golden and Anderson's (1977) abbreviated version of the Halstead Speech Sounds Perception Test. A relatively high correlation was obtained between their short form and the standard long form for a sample of 150 patients, aged 15 to 70 yr. However, the long form was more accurate in discriminating between 31 brain-damaged and 31 nonbrain-damaged patients. These results suggest that the use of the short form of this test may reduce accuracy of classification.

scholarly journals Description of vowel in the first grammatical work of Tamil and Arabic: A contrastive analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-190
Author(s):  
D. Sundararaj
Keyword(s):  
Historical Period ◽  
Speech Sounds ◽  
Contrastive Analysis ◽  
Writing Systems ◽  
Phonetic Features ◽  
Treatment Theory ◽  
Technical Terms

Abstract Tolkāppiyam and Al-Kitāb, these two grammatical texts are belonging to two different languages Tamil and Arabic. Tamil is a Dravidian family and Arabic is a Semitic family with different writing systems (Tamil-left to right; Arabic-right to left).  These two grammatical texts are written in different historical period, Tolkāppiyam written in BC 300 and Al-Kitāb written in AD 800. Both are describes the vowels of respective language through different phonetic features. The main aim of this paper is to evaluate and analyze the articulatory treatment of vowels in the perspective of first grammatical work of respective languages. The first section of the paper is evaluating the articulatory treatment, theory, classification and phonetic frameworks of vowels in respective grammars, and the second section analyzing in contrastive and describes the commonness and differences between these two texts. This section finds out the commonness in the following features: articulatory treatment, descriptive and use of technical terms etc. The differences are found in the following features: order of the description of speech sounds, method of classification of vowels etc. ---AbstrakTolkāppiyam dan Al-Kitab adalah dua teks gramatikal yang menggunakan dua bahasa yang berbeda, yakni Tamil dan Arab. Ditinjau dari aspek rumpun bahasa, Tamil merupakan keluarga bahasa Dravida, sedangkan Arab adalah keluarga bahasa Semit. Sistem penulisan kedua bahasa itu berbeda bahasa Tamil memiliki sistem penulisan dari arah kiri ke kanan; sedankgan bahasa Arab memakai sistem penulisan dari arah kanan ke kiri. Kedua teks tata bahasa itu ditulis dalam periode sejarah yang berbeda, Tolkāppiyam ditulis dalam SM 300 dan Al-Kitab yang ditulis dalam AD 800. Keduanya menunjukkan vokal bahasa masing-masing, melalui fitur fonetik yang berbeda. Tujuan utama dari artikel ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi dan menganalisis cara artikulasi vokal dalam perspektif  tata bahasa, bahasa itu. Bagian pertama dari tulisan ini mengevaluasi cara  artikulasi, teori, klasifikasi dan kerangka fonetik yang menunjukkan bunyi-bunyi vokal dalam tata bahasa masing-masing, dan bagian analisis kedua dilakukan tinjauan aspek kontrastif dan menggambarkan secara umum persamaan dan perbedaan antara dua teks tersebut. Pada kesempatan ini dipaparkan secara umum beberapa fitur antara lain: cara artikulasi, deskripsi dan penggunaan istilah teknis. Bertumpu kepeda beberapa fitur itu terdapat perbedaan yang ditemukan dalam fitur itu, yaknit: urutan deskripsi suara pidato, metode klasifikasi vokal dan beberapa fitur lainnya.DOI: 10.15408/al-turas.v23i1.4808

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document