Why Do We Need The European Private Company (Societas Privata Europaea)?

Author(s):  
Robert Drury
2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1321-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kornack

More than a year has passed since the European Commission introduced the European Private Company (Societas Privata Europaea, SPE) in June 2008. What has become of the draft statute? This paper is meant to give a short overview of its basic features, the other European institutions' discussions and statements, the problems that prevented the proposal from being adopted so far and possible solutions that were introduced.


2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolandino Guidotti

The goal of the European Union is not only to harmonize the different national legislations but also to create new company models. These new company models are not intended to replace the national models, but instead to offer a new and free choice to business operators in addition to the national models. It is predictable that among these models will be the European Private Company (Societas Privata Europaea or SPE) regulated by the Proposal for a Council Regulation (presented by the Commission) of 25 June 2008. The other preceding European legal forms have been the European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG) of 1985, the European Company (SE) of 2001 and the European Cooperative Society (SCE) of 2003.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie von Riegen

The study examines the material scope of the shareholder´s voting prohibitions and compares sec 47 (4) GmbHG with the shareholder´s duty to abstain from voting in closed corporations in France, Great Britain, Austria and Spain. Following that, the author concentrates on the controversial prohibition of voting on resolutions concerning the performance of a legal transaction and opposes the prevailing doctrine of social acts (“Sozialaktslehre”) with her own concept for a legally certain demarcation of the legal transactions affected by a prohibition of voting on the basis of the comparative legal analysis and a systematic, historical and teleological interpretation of sec 47 (4) GmbHG. Also the practice-relevant questions of the prohibition of voting on resolutions concerning the employment contract of the managing director and shareholder as well as the dispensability of the statutory prohibition of voting are discussed. Finally, developments in Union law are considered and a proposal for a voting ban in a possible future European Private Company is made.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document